07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter Six – The awkward squad<br />

Issue 2: Claims <strong>and</strong> provisions<br />

There are a number of different components to this line in the income statement:<br />

• Claims paid<br />

This represents all of the claims settled during the period. It includes all<br />

related expenses (e.g. legal costs). Naturally if any of the risk on a policy has<br />

been ceded the claims paid by the reinsurance company shall be netted<br />

against the expense.<br />

• Claims incurred<br />

An insurance company cannot wait for claims to be paid prior to recognition.<br />

This would mean that real liabilities <strong>and</strong> costs were not included in the<br />

income statement. An insurance company will be well aware of claims that<br />

have been made but not yet actually settled. In this case a provision, or<br />

reserve as insurance professionals tend to call it, is established. Like all<br />

provisions it is movement in the reserve that goes through the income<br />

statement. The balance of the claim will be recognised in the balance sheet.<br />

It is worth noting that insurance companies also provide for those claims that<br />

have not yet been reported but have been incurred. These are often referred<br />

to as ‘IBNR’ as described above.<br />

It will only be the balance of claims made, <strong>and</strong> not settled, in addition to IBNR<br />

that will be recognised on the balance sheet. Provisions for catastrophes have<br />

been prohibited by <strong>IFRS</strong> 4 <strong>and</strong> therefore will no longer be allowed. The<br />

prevalence of these provisions had started to fade over the years <strong>and</strong> so it was no<br />

surprise that they were eventually eliminated. The main rationale for not<br />

recognising such provisions is that they did not satisfy the recognition criteria in<br />

IAS 37 Provisions as there was no past event – these provisions were established<br />

for future unknown events.<br />

Issue 3: Commissions<br />

As mentioned above insurance companies often incur substantial costs upfront in<br />

order to acquire customers. If we apply the matching system then there is an<br />

argument for deferring some of these costs as the benefit will also be recognised<br />

(earned premiums) in future years. Therefore, if such an approach were to be<br />

followed the ‘DAC’ or deferred acquisition costs would be capitalised as an<br />

intangible asset <strong>and</strong> amortised over the duration of the policy.<br />

Accounting st<strong>and</strong>ards have tried to st<strong>and</strong>ardise this practice as there were widely<br />

divergent approaches in the industry. Both US GAAP <strong>and</strong> <strong>IFRS</strong> (via <strong>IFRS</strong> 4<br />

Insurance Contracts) provide that DAC can only be capitalised if:<br />

1. They are costs that relate directly to the acquisition of insurance premiums,<br />

such as commissions to agents <strong>and</strong> brokers, are deferred <strong>and</strong> amortised over<br />

the related policy period, generally one year<br />

303

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!