07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Company</strong> valuation under <strong>IFRS</strong><br />

The prior year adjustments appear to show that Tesco has overestimated its tax<br />

liability in the last two years. It has therefore reduced subsequent estimates <strong>and</strong><br />

hence the effective rate in the current year. Also note the unrecognised deferred<br />

taxation asset – these can only be recognised where recoverability is effectively<br />

guaranteed.<br />

Exhibit 4.14: Deferred taxation note<br />

Deferred taxation<br />

Amount provided<br />

2003 2002<br />

£m £m<br />

Excess capital allowances over depreciation 526 432<br />

Other timing differences (14) 8<br />

Losses carried forward (7) –<br />

505 440<br />

Source: Tesco Plc Annual Report <strong>and</strong> Financial Statements 2003<br />

This note explains the source of the deferred taxation numbers. These relate to<br />

historic capital allowances (also known as tax depreciation) being in excess of<br />

accounting depreciation. This will mean that, in the future the tax to pay will be<br />

higher as much of the tax benefit is exhausted.<br />

3.6 Building valuation models: What to do<br />

Deferred tax represents a significant problem both when modelling company<br />

accounts <strong>and</strong> when converting those forecasts into a valuation. We shall take the<br />

two separately. From inside the company – or if it provides adequate information<br />

– it is possible to calculate future deferred tax provisions or reversal of provisions<br />

in the fashion illustrated above. But what happens if we do not have this<br />

information?<br />

In most cases it is not plausible to try to model on an asset by asset basis. Instead,<br />

it may be reasonable to look at the history of the company’s tax charges over the<br />

past few years. In a simple case, if the company is mature, but still growing<br />

slowly, there may be a reasonable proportion of its annual tax charge that may be<br />

assumed to accrue as deferred tax each year <strong>and</strong> never to be paid, because as the<br />

company continues to grow, it continues each year to create capital allowances in<br />

excess of its depreciation charges.<br />

Even in the case of growing companies it cannot necessarily be assumed that<br />

deferred taxation provisions will not reverse. If capital expenditure is switched<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!