07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Five – Valuing a company<br />

Exhibit 5.6: S<strong>and</strong>vik EBIT margin<br />

20.0<br />

18.0<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

Less distorted by acquisitions, disposals <strong>and</strong> currency, this very much follows the<br />

pattern that we might expect, with a boom in the late 1980s, a severe recession in<br />

the early 1990s, a falling away with the Asian economic crisis of 1997/8, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

very bad year in 2003. It also shows that the underlying trend in operating margin<br />

is almost completely stable, which should again make it reasonable to use this as<br />

a basis for extrapolation.<br />

Remember that it is not only sales <strong>and</strong> margins that are cyclical. There tends to<br />

be a build-up of inventory as companies enter recession, <strong>and</strong> a working off of the<br />

surplus as they move out of it again. This basic cycle can be broken by price<br />

discounting, changes in credit terms to customers, <strong>and</strong> other business responses,<br />

or even changes in revenue recognition (see Chapter four) so a perfect correlation<br />

with economic activity is unlikely. And, again, there is a question of trend.<br />

Exhibit 5.7 shows inventory days for S<strong>and</strong>vik, expressing inventory in terms of<br />

cost of goods sold.<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!