07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Company</strong> valuation under <strong>IFRS</strong><br />

to trade the rights attached. (The schemes are often referred to as ‘cap <strong>and</strong> trade’).<br />

Some of the key issues are:<br />

• Should an asset be recognised?<br />

An asset should be recognised when the rights were received, <strong>and</strong> it should<br />

be classified as an intangible asset.<br />

• What value should be ascribed to the asset?<br />

The asset should initially be recognised at cost where there was a cost or at<br />

fair value where there was no initial cost.<br />

• Should the asset be revalued?<br />

Initially the IASB’s thinking was that the asset should not be subsequently<br />

remeasured at fair value; however they noted the staff’s concerns around<br />

potential mismatches between recording the asset at cost <strong>and</strong> remeasuring to<br />

fair value at each reporting date any emission liabilities recognised under<br />

IAS 37; in early 2004 the IASB’s IFRIC committee decided that emission<br />

rights <strong>and</strong> liabilities should be measured at fair value, with changes in value<br />

recognised in profit <strong>and</strong> loss.<br />

• If an asset is recorded what would the other entry be?<br />

When an asset is recognised, a liability should be recognised in the amount<br />

of the minimum obligation assumed by accepting the asset.<br />

• Will such a value always be the same as the asset value above?<br />

If not how will it balance? These two amounts (from last point above) would<br />

differ in each situation, <strong>and</strong> consequently the asset <strong>and</strong> liability would not<br />

necessarily be recognised initially at the same value. To the extent the initial<br />

values of the asset <strong>and</strong> liability differed, IFRIC believed the remaining credit<br />

should be treated as deferred income under IAS 20, Accounting for<br />

Government Grants <strong>and</strong> Disclosure of Government Assistance (i.e. treated as<br />

a government grant).<br />

2. Resource extraction companies<br />

2.1 Selling fixed assets: creative destruction<br />

Although we are going to concentrate on oil, all resource extraction companies<br />

present the same accounting <strong>and</strong> valuation challenges. To be accurate, it is the<br />

upstream, exploration <strong>and</strong> production, end of oil companies that represent the<br />

challenges. The downstream, refining <strong>and</strong> marketing, businesses are very similar<br />

to other cyclical companies, so we shall ignore them here, <strong>and</strong> concentrate on an<br />

exploration <strong>and</strong> production company.<br />

Put in a nutshell, what is odd about resource extraction companies is that they sell<br />

their fixed assets. Most companies do not. They employ fixed assets to add value<br />

to raw materials, <strong>and</strong> what is sold is a finished product or service. But what a<br />

262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!