07.11.2014 Views

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

Company Valuation Under IFRS : Interpreting and Forecasting ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Company</strong> valuation under <strong>IFRS</strong><br />

IRR of 14.75 per cent compares with an apparent return of 15.37 per cent from<br />

the first page. The second purpose is to work out what the impairment of value<br />

of the company’s assets is each year. If we do this <strong>and</strong> aggregate the figures for<br />

each year, then we get a set of numbers that we can substitute for depreciation, to<br />

derive a more meaningful set of accounts. This is done on page four of the model.<br />

In this calculation, adjusted net capital grows with investment <strong>and</strong> shrinks with<br />

impairment of value. Adjusted profit is cash flow from operations less<br />

impairment of value. Return on capital every year is 14.75 per cent, so if we were<br />

to value this company using 14.75 per cent as a discount rate it would generate<br />

zero economic profit each year, <strong>and</strong> be worth its opening balance sheet value of<br />

100. As clean value accounting holds, a DCF would also arrive at the same result.<br />

1.4.5 Valuing the HCA accounts<br />

Suppose that we had only the consolidated HCA accounts to work from, <strong>and</strong><br />

could not reconstruct individual cash flows by asset or by annual investment<br />

(which one would not normally be able to do from outside a company). Then we<br />

should be working from the consolidated cash flows, profits <strong>and</strong> balance sheets<br />

from page one in Exhibit 6.1. Let us start with the cash flows. If we know that<br />

the company will be mature after four years <strong>and</strong> will then just grow its net cash<br />

flow in line with inflation of 5 per cent annually, we have a simple stream of cash<br />

flow to discount.<br />

Turning to the profits <strong>and</strong> balance sheets, we know that if clean value accounting<br />

applies, then we know from Chapter one that we must always get the same<br />

answer out of an economic profit model <strong>and</strong> a DCF model, so a valuation based<br />

on the stated profits <strong>and</strong> balance sheets must yield the right same answer as the<br />

DCF.<br />

Let us try it. On page five of Exhibit 6.1 we have extracted the profits, balance<br />

sheets <strong>and</strong> net cash flows from page one. To begin with, let us assume that we<br />

knew that the IRR that the company was really making on its projects was 14.75<br />

per cent, as opposed to the 15.37 per cent ROCE, <strong>and</strong> use 14.75 as the discount<br />

rate. The DCF value at start Year 1 comes out at precisely 100, which is what one<br />

would expect if the company earns precisely its cost of capital. New investments<br />

do not add value <strong>and</strong> we are worth the 100 that we have already spent. The<br />

figures in the terminus are just the Year 4 figures grown for inflation.<br />

Let us try to value the company again using the economic profit model. The<br />

terminal value in the economic profit model can be calculated as just the<br />

economic profit from the terminus divided by 14.75% - 5.00% (WACC minus<br />

growth, the Gordon Growth model) as we are assuming that returns on new<br />

capital will be the same as that on old capital (see Chapter five on terminal values<br />

in economic profit models). There is no question of earning different returns on<br />

incremental capital. As with the DCF, the model has correctly derived a fair value<br />

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!