In Search of Enemies - A CIA Story - John Stockwell
In Search of Enemies - A CIA Story - John Stockwell
In Search of Enemies - A CIA Story - John Stockwell
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
[68) IN SEARCH OF ENEMIES<br />
early March they gunned down fifty unarmed MPLA activists. The<br />
fate <strong>of</strong> Angola was then sealed in blood. The issue could only be<br />
decided through violence.• Again, the <strong>CIA</strong> support <strong>of</strong> the FNLA<br />
was known in Luanda and in Kinshasa where the Soviets and Cubans<br />
maintained active embassies.<br />
Although allied with the MPLA through the early seventies, the<br />
Soviets had shut <strong>of</strong>f -the_ir support in 1973. Only in March 1975 did<br />
the Soviet Union begin significant arms shipments to the MPLA.<br />
Then, in response to the Chinese and American programs, and the<br />
FNLA's successes, it launched a massive airlift. Its AN-12 and the<br />
giant AN-22 airplanes carried their loads to the Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo<br />
(Brazzaville) where short-haul air transports and small ships filtered<br />
the weapons to MPLA units near Luanda.<br />
The Portuguese, although <strong>of</strong>ficially neutral, tended to favor the<br />
MPLA and did not inhibit their access to Soviet arms.<br />
The fighting in Luanda intensified in July. With about equal force<br />
<strong>of</strong> arms, the MPLA had the significant advantage <strong>of</strong> defending the<br />
Mbundu homelands. It prevailed and evicted the FNLA and<br />
UNIT A from Luanda.<br />
!\1acElhinney was convinced that the <strong>CIA</strong> Angola program was<br />
a mistake which would damage and discredit the United States. We<br />
were confronting the Soviets over a country that was <strong>of</strong> little importance<br />
to either <strong>of</strong> us, at a time when the United States internal politics<br />
and public sensitivities would prevent us from following through, if<br />
the conflict escalated. The Chinese and Soviets had each made public<br />
announcements <strong>of</strong> their support <strong>of</strong> Angolan factions. The United<br />
States, under Kissinger's leadership, was publicly committed to an<br />
embargo against the delivery <strong>of</strong> arms to Angolan factions while it<br />
was secretly launching a paramilitary program. Such a program was<br />
self-limiting-too small to win, it was at the same time too large to<br />
be kept secret.<br />
Okay, okay! I said. But what then do we do in Angola? What is<br />
our best line?<br />
Far better would be a policy <strong>of</strong> noninvolvement. Sincerely con-<br />
•Note that the original 40 Committee options paper acknowledged the United<br />
States' vulnerability to charges <strong>of</strong> escalating the Angola conflict when it stated that<br />
a leak by an American <strong>of</strong>ficial source would be serious, that we would be charged<br />
with responsibility for the spread <strong>of</strong> civil war in Angola.