24.11.2014 Views

In Search of Enemies - A CIA Story - John Stockwell

In Search of Enemies - A CIA Story - John Stockwell

In Search of Enemies - A CIA Story - John Stockwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

[68) IN SEARCH OF ENEMIES<br />

early March they gunned down fifty unarmed MPLA activists. The<br />

fate <strong>of</strong> Angola was then sealed in blood. The issue could only be<br />

decided through violence.• Again, the <strong>CIA</strong> support <strong>of</strong> the FNLA<br />

was known in Luanda and in Kinshasa where the Soviets and Cubans<br />

maintained active embassies.<br />

Although allied with the MPLA through the early seventies, the<br />

Soviets had shut <strong>of</strong>f -the_ir support in 1973. Only in March 1975 did<br />

the Soviet Union begin significant arms shipments to the MPLA.<br />

Then, in response to the Chinese and American programs, and the<br />

FNLA's successes, it launched a massive airlift. Its AN-12 and the<br />

giant AN-22 airplanes carried their loads to the Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo<br />

(Brazzaville) where short-haul air transports and small ships filtered<br />

the weapons to MPLA units near Luanda.<br />

The Portuguese, although <strong>of</strong>ficially neutral, tended to favor the<br />

MPLA and did not inhibit their access to Soviet arms.<br />

The fighting in Luanda intensified in July. With about equal force<br />

<strong>of</strong> arms, the MPLA had the significant advantage <strong>of</strong> defending the<br />

Mbundu homelands. It prevailed and evicted the FNLA and<br />

UNIT A from Luanda.<br />

!\1acElhinney was convinced that the <strong>CIA</strong> Angola program was<br />

a mistake which would damage and discredit the United States. We<br />

were confronting the Soviets over a country that was <strong>of</strong> little importance<br />

to either <strong>of</strong> us, at a time when the United States internal politics<br />

and public sensitivities would prevent us from following through, if<br />

the conflict escalated. The Chinese and Soviets had each made public<br />

announcements <strong>of</strong> their support <strong>of</strong> Angolan factions. The United<br />

States, under Kissinger's leadership, was publicly committed to an<br />

embargo against the delivery <strong>of</strong> arms to Angolan factions while it<br />

was secretly launching a paramilitary program. Such a program was<br />

self-limiting-too small to win, it was at the same time too large to<br />

be kept secret.<br />

Okay, okay! I said. But what then do we do in Angola? What is<br />

our best line?<br />

Far better would be a policy <strong>of</strong> noninvolvement. Sincerely con-<br />

•Note that the original 40 Committee options paper acknowledged the United<br />

States' vulnerability to charges <strong>of</strong> escalating the Angola conflict when it stated that<br />

a leak by an American <strong>of</strong>ficial source would be serious, that we would be charged<br />

with responsibility for the spread <strong>of</strong> civil war in Angola.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!