09.11.2012 Views

pdf (2.5 MB) - METRO Group

pdf (2.5 MB) - METRO Group

pdf (2.5 MB) - METRO Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>METRO</strong> GROUP : ANNUAL REPORT 2010 : BUSINESS<br />

→ NOTES : NOTES TO ThE GROuP ACCOuNTING PRINCIPlES ANd METhOdS<br />

combinations occurring in financial years starting on or<br />

after 1 July 2009. As a result, <strong>METRO</strong> GROuP had to apply<br />

these revised standards for the first time to business combinations<br />

in the financial year 2010.<br />

With respect to the accounting treatment of the goodwill<br />

resulting from a business combination, an option was introduced<br />

giving companies a choice to also recognise goodwill<br />

attributable to non-controlling interests (new term for<br />

minority interests). This full goodwill method has a consequential<br />

effect resulting in a higher share of “non-controlling<br />

interests” in “equity”. As <strong>METRO</strong> GROuP does not make<br />

use of this option, goodwill continued to be measured at its<br />

proportionate interest.<br />

under the previous IfRS 3, costs that were directly attributable<br />

to the corporate acquisition, such as notary and consultancy<br />

fees, were included in the cost of acquisition. Starting<br />

in the financial year 2010, all acquisition-related costs<br />

arising in the context of a business combination must be<br />

recognised directly in expenses.<br />

With respect to step acquisitions, starting from the financial<br />

year 2010, the equity interests held at the date that control<br />

is achieved must be remeasured, with any gain recognised<br />

in profit or loss. Any differences between the previous carrying<br />

amount of the interests in the subsidiary and the proportionate<br />

remeasured net assets of the subsidiary must be<br />

recognised as goodwill. No step acquisitions occurred in the<br />

financial year 2010.<br />

Any contingent consideration arrangements agreed as part<br />

of a corporate acquisition must be measured at fair value at<br />

the acquisition date and, in accordance with the terms and<br />

conditions of the contract, recognised as assets, liabilities<br />

or equity. In contrast to the previous standards, any subsequent<br />

adjustments of goodwill following changes in the purchase<br />

price in subsequent periods due to future events (for<br />

example, the achievement of a sales target) are no longer<br />

allowed.<br />

The revised IAS 27 requires changes in subsidiary equity<br />

interests to be accounted for as equity transactions outside<br />

of profit or loss as long as they do not result in a loss of<br />

control. In case of a loss of control, however, the assets and<br />

liabilities of the former subsidiary are fully derecognised.<br />

Any remaining interests are recognised at fair value, with<br />

the difference from the previously recognised carrying<br />

amounts recognised in profit or loss.<br />

The negative balance of non-controlling interests that<br />

become negative as a result of losses must be disclosed<br />

→ p. 155<br />

openly in equity. These were previously netted against the<br />

majority equity.<br />

The amendments to IfRS 3 and IAS 27 had no material effect<br />

on the consolidated financial statements of <strong>METRO</strong> AG.<br />

IFRS 5 (Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued<br />

Operations) in conjunction with IFRS 1 (First-time Adoption<br />

of International Financial Reporting Standards)<br />

With regards to subsidiaries classified as “held for sale” in<br />

which the entity maintains a non-controlling interest after<br />

the divestment, the previous standard provided for the<br />

option of classifying as “held for sale” only the proportionate<br />

portion of the subsidiary’s assets and liabilities. The<br />

“Improvements to IfRSs 2008” clarify that the subsidiary’s<br />

assets and liabilities must be fully classified as “held for<br />

sale” even if the former parent maintains a non-controlling<br />

interest in the subsidiary.<br />

As a result of these amendments, IfRS 1 was revised to<br />

require first-time adopters of IfRS to also fulfil this requirement.<br />

The amendments to IfRS 5 had no effect on the consolidated<br />

financial statements of <strong>METRO</strong> AG.<br />

IAS 17 (Leases)<br />

IAS 17 was revised in connection with the “Improvements to<br />

IfRSs 2009”. In the process, the previous regulation whereby<br />

land lease relationships must principally be treated as<br />

operating leases if ownership of the leased object is not<br />

transferred to the lessee after the end of the lease term was<br />

abandoned. Starting in the financial year 2010, all land lease<br />

relationships must be treated analogously to other lease<br />

objects and classified as finance leases or operating leases.<br />

This also applies to existing lease relationships.<br />

land lease relationships of <strong>METRO</strong> GROuP were reclassified<br />

in the first quarter of 2010 based on data as of 1 January 2010<br />

using the transition regulation. landed property that was<br />

reclassified as finance leases exclusively concerned leasing<br />

agreements with very long terms. The reclassification<br />

resulted in a recognition of assets under “tangible assets”<br />

amounting to €67 million and a decline in “other receivables<br />

and assets” by €23 million due to the dissolution of<br />

accrual items for prepaid leases. Additional liabilities<br />

totalling €72 million were disclosed in “financial liabilities”.<br />

The difference between assets and liabilities amounting<br />

to €–28 million was offset in “reserves retained from<br />

earnings”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!