09.11.2012 Views

pdf (2.5 MB) - METRO Group

pdf (2.5 MB) - METRO Group

pdf (2.5 MB) - METRO Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>METRO</strong> GROUP : ANNUAL REPORT 2010 : BUSINESS<br />

→ NOTES : NOTES TO ThE GROuP ACCOuNTING PRINCIPlES ANd METhOdS<br />

IAS 39 (Financial Instruments: Recognition and<br />

Measurement)<br />

The amendments to IAS 39 clarify that a one-sided risk in a<br />

hedging relationship may also be hedged. In this case, the<br />

entity designates only the changes in the cash flows or fair<br />

value of the hedged item that are above or below a specified<br />

variable (for example, the price). Where an option was purchased<br />

as a hedging instrument, its intrinsic value, not its<br />

fair value, reflects a one-sided risk.<br />

In principle, inflation does not represent a separately identifiable<br />

risk and may therefore not be designated as a hedged<br />

risk. The amendments to IAS 39 now permit the cash flow<br />

hedging of changes in inflation where these reflect a contractually<br />

specified portion of cash flows of a recognised<br />

financial instrument.<br />

The amendments to IAS 39 had no effects on the consolidated<br />

financial statements of <strong>METRO</strong> AG.<br />

IFRIC 12 (Service Concession Arrangements)<br />

The interpretation prescribes the disclosure requirements<br />

for so-called service concession arrangements. These are<br />

arrangements whereby a government or other public sector<br />

body contracts with a private operator to implement public<br />

infrastructure projects such as road construction, energy<br />

distribution networks, etc.<br />

depending on the type of arrangement, the entity recognises<br />

a financial or intangible asset. The financial asset represents<br />

the unconditional contractual right to receive an<br />

amount of cash or another financial asset from the government<br />

in return for constructing a public sector asset. An<br />

intangible asset must be recognised for the entity’s right to<br />

charge for use of a public sector asset that it has constructed.<br />

The financial or intangible assets recognised in<br />

connection with service concession arrangements must be<br />

measured at fair value.<br />

The first-time adoption of IfRIC 12 had no effects on the<br />

consolidated financial statements of <strong>METRO</strong> AG.<br />

IFRIC 15 (Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate)<br />

IfRIC 15 regulates the recognition of revenue for off plan<br />

sales of real estate units. According to the interpretation,<br />

an agreement for the construction of real estate is a construction<br />

contract within the scope of IAS 11 only when the<br />

buyer is able to specify the major structural elements of the<br />

design of the real estate before construction begins or once<br />

construction is in progress, irrespective of whether it exer-<br />

→ p. 156<br />

cises that ability or not. If the buyer has no or only little<br />

ability to influence the design of the real estate, the agreement<br />

does not represent a construction contract and IAS 18<br />

(Revenue) applies.<br />

According to IfRIC 15, the percentage of completion method<br />

may apply to an IAS 18 case if the entity either provides construction<br />

services or sells a completed real estate property<br />

where control over the risks and rewards of ownership of<br />

the work in progress are transferred to the buyer as construction<br />

progresses. If the control and the risks and<br />

rewards are transferred at a single time, a recognition as<br />

construction progresses is not permissible.<br />

The application of IfRIC 15 had no effect on the consolidated<br />

financial statements of <strong>METRO</strong> AG.<br />

IFRIC 16 (Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign<br />

Operation)<br />

According to IfRIC 16, a parent entity may designate as a<br />

hedged risk only the foreign exchange differences arising<br />

from a difference between its own functional currency and<br />

that of its foreign operation. The hedging of foreign exchange<br />

differences between a presentation currency of the parent<br />

entity’s consolidated financial statements that deviates<br />

from the functional currency and the functional currency of<br />

the foreign operation is not permissible.<br />

IfRIC 16 also concludes that hedging instruments in a hedge<br />

of a net investment in a foreign operation may be held by any<br />

entity within the group as long as the requirements of hedge<br />

accounting are met. In addition, IfRIC 16 clarifies that both<br />

the effective portion of gains and losses from the hedging<br />

instrument and the cumulative recognised amount from the<br />

foreign currency translation for the net investment in a foreign<br />

operation must be reclassified from equity to profit or<br />

loss when the entity disposes of the foreign operation.<br />

The application of IfRIC 16 had no effect on the consolidated<br />

financial statements of <strong>METRO</strong> AG.<br />

IFRIC 17 (Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners)<br />

IfRIC 17 clarifies that non-cash dividend payables must be<br />

recognised as liabilities when the dividend has been appropriately<br />

authorised and is no longer at the discretion of the<br />

entity. This generally corresponds to the time when the<br />

dividend is announced by the responsible management and<br />

approved by the relevant instance (for example, the shareholders),<br />

where this is legally stipulated. The dividend payable<br />

must be measured at fair value. Any differences

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!