02.01.2015 Views

Airport Master Plan 2012 - City of Waterville

Airport Master Plan 2012 - City of Waterville

Airport Master Plan 2012 - City of Waterville

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Runway 5-23 provides for over 94% wind coverage, closing Runway 14-32 would have only a<br />

limited effect on airport operations. Nevertheless, closing the runway would adversely impact<br />

aircraft that routinely use the runway.<br />

The Runway would be closed by installing runway closure markings (“X”) and by issuing<br />

appropriate NOTAMS as well. Portions <strong>of</strong> runway pavement would be removed only when<br />

necessary to <strong>of</strong>fset the impervious surface associated with any future Apron development, or<br />

should portions <strong>of</strong> the runway be converted to a taxiway, pavement would be removed to meet<br />

FAA design standards.<br />

Table 4.1<br />

Runway Alternatives Analysis<br />

Analysis Factor<br />

Impact<br />

R0: “Do Nothing”<br />

Engineering No Change<br />

Operational No Change, Runway remains closed<br />

Environmental No Change<br />

Land Use No change<br />

R1: Rehabilitate Runway 14-32 and reduce width from 150 ft. to 60 ft.<br />

Engineering Significant Costs associated with Runway Rehabilitation<br />

Operational No Change, Runway maintains B-I category<br />

Environmental Improvement- Decreases the amount <strong>of</strong> impervious surface<br />

Land Use No change<br />

R2: Permanently close Runway 14-32<br />

Engineering Limited related to Xing out the Runway<br />

Operational Limited considering that RWY 5-23 has over 94% wind coverage<br />

Environmental<br />

Improvement, decrease the amount <strong>of</strong> impervious surface should portions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

runway be removed.<br />

Land Use Eliminates noise impacts and Object Height Restrictions <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> Runway ends<br />

Runway Alternatives Conclusion<br />

The <strong>Airport</strong> received overwhelming support for keeping Runway 14-32 open, thereby choosing<br />

Alternative R-1. <strong>Airport</strong> users indicated Runway 14-32 was essential for light aircraft operations and<br />

training. FAA design guidelines will mandate that the runway width will be reduced from 150 feet to 60<br />

feet wide; the <strong>Airport</strong> should receive credit for the reduced impervious surface. Alternative R-1 has<br />

additional cost impacts, namely land and/or easement acquisition required for airspace protection, which<br />

also involves <strong>of</strong>f-airport vegetation removal.<br />

4.2 <strong>Airport</strong> Taxiway System Alternatives<br />

The <strong>Airport</strong>‟s taxiway system should provide for free movement and direct routing to and from the<br />

runways, terminal area and aircraft parking areas. It should allow for smooth aircraft taxiing requiring<br />

minimum changes in aircraft speed. Principles for designing taxiways include:<br />

Providing each runway with a parallel taxiway or the capability <strong>of</strong> a parallel taxiway.<br />

Build taxiways to provide as direct a route as possible.<br />

Provide bypass capability or multiple access to runway ends.<br />

Avoid crossing runways as much as possible.<br />

The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Waterville</strong> Maine<br />

Alternatives Analysis – Page 4-3<br />

<strong>Airport</strong> Solutions Group, LLC & The Louis Berger Group, Inc. December 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!