07.01.2015 Views

A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi

A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi

A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In that period, this became an issue for <strong>the</strong> industry<br />

when inflation rates were very high, <strong>and</strong> in some<br />

states <strong>the</strong> rate ceilings were less than banks’ cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> funds 263 . Restrictive usury laws limited <strong>the</strong> volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> credit card lending, <strong>the</strong>reby limiting <strong>the</strong> income<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> lenders, <strong>and</strong> leading lenders to extend<br />

credit only to higher quality borrowers, shutting<br />

out lower quality borrowers from <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

This situation resulted in less credit availability <strong>and</strong><br />

lower charge-<strong>of</strong>fs 264 .<br />

In a l<strong>and</strong>mark court decision in 1978 265 , <strong>the</strong> <strong>US</strong><br />

Supreme Court ruled that <strong>the</strong> lender’s location<br />

determined <strong>the</strong> operative state usury ceiling no<br />

matter where <strong>the</strong> customer resided – even if <strong>the</strong> state<br />

<strong>of</strong> residence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> consumer would have a lower<br />

usury ceiling. This gave incentive to large card issuers<br />

to find a lender-friendly state in which to establish<br />

national operations. The Court ruling <strong>of</strong> 1978 brought<br />

about liberalisation <strong>of</strong> interest rates which led to a<br />

significant expansion <strong>of</strong> credit availability which<br />

facilitated credit to higher-risk borrowers. According<br />

to <strong>the</strong> FDIC, <strong>the</strong> liberalisation <strong>of</strong> interest rates also<br />

resulted in higher credit prices for consumers.<br />

Moreover, it had an important impact on <strong>US</strong> personal<br />

bankruptcy rates which rose from less than one<br />

per thous<strong>and</strong> heads <strong>of</strong> population in <strong>the</strong> early 1970s<br />

to almost five per thous<strong>and</strong> heads <strong>of</strong> population<br />

in 1997 266 .<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> federal legislative framework, <strong>the</strong> <strong>US</strong><br />

Consumer Credit Protection Act <strong>of</strong> 1968, which is<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>US</strong> Code (Title 15, Chapter 41), contains in<br />

its Title I – Consumer Credit Disclosure – core provisions<br />

on consumer credit, in particular regarding general<br />

provisions, credit transactions, credit advertising,<br />

credit billing <strong>and</strong> consumer leasing 267 . The Consumer<br />

Credit Protection Act is considered to be l<strong>and</strong>mark<br />

legislation. For <strong>the</strong> first time, creditors had to state<br />

<strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> borrowing in a common language so that<br />

<strong>the</strong> consumer could underst<strong>and</strong> what <strong>the</strong> charges<br />

are, compare cost <strong>and</strong> shop for <strong>the</strong> best deal.<br />

The Act protects consumers defined as natural<br />

persons acting in a transaction for primarily personal,<br />

family or households purposes 268 . A good number <strong>of</strong><br />

transactions are exempted from <strong>the</strong> Consumer<br />

Credit Protection Act, for example credit transactions<br />

<strong>of</strong> more than $25,000 269 .<br />

6.2.1.1.2 Information disclosure <strong>and</strong> duty to advise<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> numerous laws regulating consumer<br />

credit in general, <strong>the</strong> main set <strong>of</strong> rules dealing<br />

with information disclosure is <strong>the</strong> Truth in Lending<br />

Act from 1969. This Act has been implemented by<br />

Regulation Z (adopted by <strong>the</strong> Federal Reserve Board)<br />

<strong>and</strong> integrated as Title 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Consumer Credit<br />

Protection Act. Regulation Z has been amended<br />

in numerous occasions. The main purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Regulation is to prevent abuses in consumer credit cost<br />

disclosure <strong>and</strong> to require uniformity in such disclosures.<br />

Regulation Z provides two different information<br />

disclosure regimes depending on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> credit<br />

is an open-end or close-end type <strong>of</strong> credit. An openend<br />

credit is “when <strong>the</strong> creditor reasonably considers<br />

repeated transactions, which prescribe <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong><br />

such transactions <strong>and</strong> which provide for a finance<br />

charge which may be computed from time to time<br />

on <strong>the</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing unpaid balance” 270 , e.g. credit<br />

cards <strong>and</strong> home equity release credit lines are openend<br />

credits. Closed-end credit encompasses all<br />

consumer credit not extended under an open-end<br />

plan. Under closed-end credit plans, <strong>the</strong> consumer<br />

receives a complete disclosure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs associated<br />

with <strong>the</strong> credit transaction before <strong>the</strong> transaction is<br />

actually consummated.<br />

263 “The Future <strong>of</strong> Banking in America” by Neil B.Murphy (FDIC Banking Review, 2004), Page. 77.<br />

264 FDIC Bank Trends, March 1998. See also studies by Canner <strong>and</strong> Fergus (1987) <strong>and</strong> Villegas (1989).<br />

265 <strong>US</strong> Supreme Court case “Marquette National Bank <strong>of</strong> Minneapolis vs. First Omaha Services”<br />

266 FDIC report on “The effect <strong>of</strong> Consumer Interest Rate Deregulation on Credit Card Volumes, Charge-<strong>of</strong>fs, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Personal Bankruptcy Rate”, March 1998.<br />

267 Sections 101-181 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>US</strong> Code.<br />

268 See definition under General Provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Consumer Credit Disclosure Act – Consumer Credit Protection Act.<br />

269 Exemptions listed under Section 104 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Consumer Credit Protection Act – Title 1, also include transactions involving extensions <strong>of</strong> credit primarily for<br />

business, commercial, or agricultural purposes, or to government or governmental agencies or instrumentalities or to organisations; transactions in securities<br />

or commodities accounts by a broker-dealer registered with <strong>the</strong> Securities <strong>and</strong> Exchange Commission; credit transactions, o<strong>the</strong>r than those in which a security<br />

interest is or will be acquired in real property, or in personal property used or expected to be used as <strong>the</strong> principal dwelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> consumer, in which <strong>the</strong><br />

total amount financed exceeds $25,000; transactions under public utility tariffs, if <strong>the</strong> Board determines that a State regulatory body regulates <strong>the</strong> charges<br />

for <strong>the</strong> public utility services involved, <strong>the</strong> charges for delayed payment, <strong>and</strong> any discount allowed for early payment; transactions for which <strong>the</strong> Board (<strong>the</strong><br />

Federal Reserve Board), by rule, determines that coverage under this title is not necessary to carry out <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> this title <strong>and</strong> loans made, insured, or<br />

guaranteed pursuant to a program authorised by title IV <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Higher Education Act <strong>of</strong> 1965.<br />

270 Definition provided by <strong>the</strong> Truth In Lending Act.<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!