07.01.2015 Views

A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi

A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi

A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.3.2 Efficiency <strong>of</strong> credit institutions<br />

5.3.2.1 United States<br />

5.3.2.1.1 Net interest margins<br />

Figures in table 12 on <strong>the</strong> following page which<br />

show <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> net interest margins in <strong>the</strong> <strong>US</strong><br />

between 1992 <strong>and</strong> 2003 reveal that interest margins<br />

<strong>of</strong> credit institutions in <strong>the</strong> <strong>US</strong> have decreased to a<br />

degree, whe<strong>the</strong>r looking at aggregate data for <strong>the</strong><br />

whole industry or at data by type <strong>of</strong> credit institution.<br />

The decrease in net interest margin is commonly<br />

explained by two main factors: increased competition<br />

in <strong>the</strong> sector, which reduces <strong>the</strong> banks’ margins both<br />

on <strong>the</strong> asset side <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> liability side, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

downward trend as regards interest rates during <strong>the</strong><br />

considered period. In particular, in <strong>the</strong> environment<br />

<strong>of</strong> low interest rates experienced during <strong>the</strong> years<br />

2001 – 2003, banks seem to have been reluctant<br />

to reduce <strong>the</strong>ir rates on some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir funding<br />

instruments, such as core deposits, in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

proportion as <strong>the</strong> decrease in interest rate. This has<br />

in turn affected <strong>the</strong>ir margins.<br />

5.3.2.1.2 Return on equity<br />

Table 13 below shows that aggregate ROE for all<br />

types <strong>of</strong> <strong>US</strong> credit institutions for <strong>the</strong> period 1994-<br />

2003 has remained relatively stable given that it<br />

amounted to 19.2% in 1994 <strong>and</strong> 20.7% in 2003.<br />

The trend has however been different for <strong>the</strong><br />

different types <strong>of</strong> institutions: whereas <strong>the</strong> ROE has<br />

remained relatively stable for commercial banks, it<br />

has experienced an upward trend in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong><br />

savings institutions <strong>and</strong> a decrease in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong><br />

credit unions.<br />

There are also marked differences between categories<br />

<strong>of</strong> institutions in relation to <strong>the</strong>ir level <strong>of</strong> ROE.<br />

This contrasts with <strong>the</strong> situation as regards interest<br />

margins, where <strong>the</strong> levels were pretty similar for <strong>the</strong><br />

different types <strong>of</strong> institutions. More concretely, while<br />

<strong>the</strong> average ROE <strong>of</strong> commercial banks <strong>and</strong> savings<br />

institutions is high, amounting to around 20%,<br />

<strong>the</strong> average ROE <strong>of</strong> credit unions lies at a much<br />

lower level, having been consistently lower than<br />

10% since 1996.<br />

It should be noted here that despite <strong>the</strong> decrease<br />

observed between 1992 <strong>and</strong> 2003, <strong>the</strong> net interest<br />

margin <strong>of</strong> <strong>US</strong> banks remains quite high as compared<br />

to international st<strong>and</strong>ards.<br />

Table 12: Evolution <strong>of</strong> net interest margins in <strong>the</strong> <strong>US</strong>, 1992-2003<br />

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

Commercial banks 3.89% 3.89% 3.78% 3.71% 3.70% 3.64% 3.51% 3.50% 3.40% 3.35% 3.50% 3.27%<br />

Savings institutions 3.13% 3.26% 3.12% 2.89% 3.01% 3.03% 2.89% 2.88% 2.74% 2.94% 3.05% 2.97%<br />

Credit unions (CU) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.96% 3.98% 3.82% 3.73% 3.77% 3.59% 3.63% 3.42%<br />

Total excl. CU 3.72% 3.76% 3.65% 3.55% 3.58% 3.54% 3.41% 3.40% 3.30% 3.28% 3.43% 3.22%<br />

<strong>US</strong> Average n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 15.37% 15.02% 12.73% 12.41% 10.99% 10.47% 9.42% 9.22%<br />

Sources: ESBG calculations based on FDIC <strong>and</strong> NCUA data.<br />

Table 13: Evolution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Return on Equity (before taxes) in <strong>the</strong> <strong>US</strong>, 1992-2003<br />

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

Commercial banks 17.6% 21.2% 21.5% 21.4% 21.4% 21.8% 20.3% 23.1% 20.5% 18.6% 20.6% 21.9%<br />

Savings institutions 14.1% 13.6% 12.7% 13.7% 11.7% 15.3% 16.3% 17.9% 16.0% 18.2% 18.1% 19.9%<br />

Credit unions (CU) n.a. n.a. 12.4% 10.7% 10.0% 9.0% 8.3% 8.3% 8.6% 8.2% 9.4% 8.8%<br />

Total excl. CU 16.8% 19.6% 19.7% 19.9% 19.6% 20.6% 19.6% 22.3% 19.8% 18.5% 20.2% 21.6%<br />

<strong>US</strong> Average n.a. n.a. 19.2% 19.3% 18.9% 19.8% 18.8% 21.2% 18.9% 17.8% 19.4% 20.7%<br />

Sources: ESBG calculations based on FDIC <strong>and</strong> NCUA data.<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!