A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi
A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi
A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In terms <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> deposits, for <strong>the</strong><br />
period 1992 to 2003, non-bank deposits in <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong><br />
grew on average by 7% a year, equivalent to growth<br />
in interbank deposits (<strong>the</strong> next biggest form <strong>of</strong><br />
liability), though smaller than bonds (10% average<br />
growth over <strong>the</strong> same period).<br />
Regarding o<strong>the</strong>r liabilities, interbank deposits have<br />
similarly remained a relatively constant source <strong>of</strong><br />
total bank funds, while bonds <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r liabilities<br />
(which include borrowings o<strong>the</strong>r than deposits <strong>and</strong><br />
bills <strong>of</strong> exchange) have grown slightly.<br />
Looking at <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> deposits (<strong>of</strong> commercial<br />
<strong>and</strong> savings banks combined) to GDP, Table 11 shows<br />
that in 1980, <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> bank deposits to<br />
total GDP for Continental Europe’s banks amounted<br />
to 65% <strong>of</strong> GDP, while in 2000 that proportion was<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> 93%. In comparison, <strong>the</strong> equivalent<br />
figures for <strong>the</strong> UK were 28% <strong>and</strong> 100%.<br />
5.3.1.2.2 Bank assets<br />
On <strong>the</strong> asset side, <strong>the</strong> main <strong>and</strong> by far most<br />
significant balance sheet items for banks in Europe<br />
were <strong>and</strong> remained loans for <strong>the</strong> period 1992-2003.<br />
In 1992, loans made up 48% <strong>of</strong> total assets,<br />
while in 2003 <strong>the</strong>y represented 47% <strong>of</strong> total assets.<br />
After loans, interbank deposits represent <strong>the</strong> largest<br />
assets, though <strong>the</strong>se have been falling as a proportion<br />
<strong>of</strong> total bank assets over time (see also table M in <strong>the</strong><br />
table annex for <strong>the</strong> figures to graph 12).<br />
Over <strong>the</strong> period, securities as a proportion <strong>of</strong> total<br />
bank assets grew from representing 15% to 21%.<br />
Looking at country-specific data reveals that though<br />
loans are indeed <strong>the</strong> main asset in <strong>the</strong> great majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> European bank balance-sheets, <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
securities to total assets is a great deal higher than<br />
<strong>the</strong> European average in Sweden, Greece, Denmark<br />
<strong>and</strong> Belgium.<br />
100%<br />
Graph 12: Structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assets in <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong>, 1992 – 2003 (in %)<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />
■ Cash <strong>and</strong> balance with Central Bank<br />
■ Interbank deposits<br />
■ Loans<br />
■ Securities<br />
■ O<strong>the</strong>r assets<br />
Source: ESBG calculation based on OECD data: “Bank<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>itability”, 2002 & 2004.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> bank loans to <strong>the</strong> private sector as a<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> GDP, <strong>the</strong> average in 1980 for continental<br />
Europe was 60%, <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> UK it was 27.6%.<br />
In 2000, this proportion had grown to represent an<br />
average across continental Europe <strong>of</strong> 93.7%, while<br />
for <strong>the</strong> UK it represented 132% (see table 11).<br />
92