07.01.2015 Views

A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi

A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi

A comparative analysis of the US and EU retail banking markets - Wsbi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The SROs have <strong>the</strong> responsibility to develop rules<br />

which guarantee <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>markets</strong> <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are responsible for <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> investors.<br />

These rules must be submitted to <strong>the</strong> SEC, which<br />

has to agree on <strong>the</strong>m, after having performed a<br />

public consultation. However, <strong>the</strong> SEC also has <strong>the</strong><br />

possibility to draft rules which are directly applicable<br />

to <strong>the</strong> entirety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

It should be noted here that in <strong>the</strong> American regulatory<br />

system, a distinction is made in terms <strong>of</strong> responsible<br />

authorities between securities <strong>and</strong> futures; in <strong>the</strong><br />

futures area, like in <strong>the</strong> securities one, supervision<br />

<strong>and</strong> regulation are organised at <strong>the</strong> federal level. In<br />

this field however, federal oversight is ensured by <strong>the</strong><br />

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) (<strong>and</strong><br />

not by <strong>the</strong> SEC), whereas industry oversight is <strong>the</strong><br />

responsibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SROs – <strong>the</strong> futures exchanges<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Futures Association (NFA).<br />

4.2.2.1.3 Responsible authorities in<br />

<strong>the</strong> insurance area<br />

The regulation <strong>and</strong> supervision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> insurance area<br />

is <strong>the</strong> exclusive responsibility <strong>of</strong> regulators at <strong>the</strong> states<br />

level, unlike in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r financial services sectors.<br />

The view that regulation should take place at <strong>the</strong><br />

states level was defended by <strong>the</strong> McCarren-Ferguson<br />

Act <strong>of</strong> 1945. A central structure was however<br />

established to help coordinate <strong>the</strong> approaches <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> 50 state regulators: <strong>the</strong> National Association <strong>of</strong><br />

Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).<br />

Historically, state regulators in <strong>the</strong> insurance area<br />

have stressed specifically <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>and</strong> soundness<br />

issues, as well as <strong>the</strong> conduct-<strong>of</strong>-business area,<br />

especially in relation to sales practices.<br />

4.2.2.2 European Union<br />

4.2.2.2.1 <strong>EU</strong> bodies<br />

In <strong>the</strong> European Union, <strong>the</strong> responsibility for supervising<br />

<strong>the</strong> financial services area lies entirely at <strong>the</strong> Member<br />

States level. There are <strong>the</strong>refore no <strong>EU</strong> bodies in <strong>the</strong><br />

financial area comparable to <strong>the</strong> <strong>US</strong> regulatory<br />

agencies. Some “Committees” however play a<br />

coordinating role, <strong>and</strong> will <strong>the</strong>refore be presented in<br />

<strong>the</strong> subsequent section “Coordination in <strong>the</strong> <strong>EU</strong>”.<br />

4.2.2.2.2 Member State level<br />

Member States are responsible for organising <strong>the</strong><br />

supervision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir financial services sector in <strong>the</strong><br />

way <strong>the</strong>y consider <strong>the</strong> most appropriate. Consequently,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is much variety among <strong>the</strong> supervisory<br />

structures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 25 individual Member States.<br />

Historically, in most <strong>EU</strong> Member States supervision<br />

was organised for each different area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

services sector individually: <strong>banking</strong>, securities <strong>and</strong><br />

insurance. However, this situation changed in recent<br />

years in several Member States, with a clear trend<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> a single authority to<br />

supervise <strong>the</strong> three traditional sectors. This move was<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten presented as a response to important changes<br />

in <strong>the</strong> financial sector, such as <strong>the</strong> increasing blurring<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specificities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

services businesses <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> trend towards more<br />

consolidation <strong>and</strong> conglomeration in <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

sector, especially at <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Member States.<br />

The first country to establish an independent single<br />

supervisory authority was <strong>the</strong> UK in 1997 with <strong>the</strong><br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Financial Services Authority (FSA).<br />

The FSA is responsible for <strong>the</strong> prudential supervision<br />

<strong>and</strong> more general business supervision <strong>of</strong> all financial<br />

institutions <strong>and</strong> <strong>markets</strong>. O<strong>the</strong>r countries have also<br />

re-examined <strong>the</strong>ir supervisory arrangements. A single<br />

authority was for instance created in Luxembourg 145<br />

in 1998. A proposal for a single authority in<br />

Germany 146 was put forward in January 2001 <strong>and</strong><br />

entered into force in April 2002. In Austria too, a<br />

single authority 147 was formally established in April<br />

2002. In each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se cases, <strong>the</strong> single authority is<br />

independent from any o<strong>the</strong>r institution.<br />

National central banks also play a role in supervision.<br />

Traditionally, <strong>the</strong>ir direct role in <strong>the</strong> supervisory<br />

process was limited to <strong>the</strong> <strong>banking</strong> sector. In certain<br />

Member States however, a decline in this role has<br />

been observed in recent years as a direct consequence<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> combining <strong>of</strong> financial supervisory competences<br />

in just one agency. There are never<strong>the</strong>less exceptions,<br />

such as Irel<strong>and</strong>, where a single authority has been<br />

created under <strong>the</strong> wing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national central bank,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s, which is <strong>the</strong> first <strong>EU</strong> Member<br />

State in which <strong>the</strong> central bank will take over <strong>the</strong><br />

supervision <strong>of</strong> all three financial sectors, thus<br />

breaking with a long supervisory tradition, where <strong>the</strong><br />

role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central bank is generally limited to<br />

maintaining financial stability.<br />

145 Commission de surveillance du Secteur Financier.<br />

146 Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin).<br />

147 Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA).<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!