Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure C-3 Example of landscape character mapping Source: Visual Landscape Planning in Western Australia - a manual for evaluation assessment, siting and design, (WAPC 2007) Page 94 Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines – 2 July 2010
C.7.2 Levels of significance What are Levels of Significance Significance is the weighting of the relative importance of identified values. Valued landscape character and features that are likely to be significant are those which contribute to existing quality of life, high scenic quality, help understand the past, enrich the present, and which will be of value to future generations. The rating of significance usually involves comparison with other similar places alongside the consideration of the extent to which values are likely to be held across communities or cultural groups (e.g. at local, regional, state, national, international scales), and/or the strength and importance of the values within the community who holds them. The significance of any one value is usually given a rating of either local, regional, state, national or international importance. What are Levels of Significance used for Assessing and rating landscapes for their relative significance assists in providing a sound strategic basis for future decision making. The Wind Farms and Landscape Values: National Assessment Framework (2007) concludes that ‘applying a rating of significance to landscape values is essential to defining and assessing the acceptability or otherwise of impacts upon those values’. A preliminary assessment of landscape significance is essential to allow for early identification of highly significant landscapes and to inform site selection and locational decisions. How do I go about it Determining Levels of Significance Increasingly, strategic assessments consider the relative significance of landscape character and features for the purpose of informing the application of controls or guidelines for management. Some states have completed partial strategic landscape evaluation studies across regions, including Victoria (e.g. Planisphere, 2006); South Australia (e.g. Lothian, 2005); Queensland (e.g. Caboolture Shire, n.d.), which aim to identify highly significant landscapes (or to provide frameworks for their identification). In each case, these assessments are primarily concerned with visual character and scenic values, however they all have some relevance and can provide a sound starting point for assessing and rating the significance of potential wind farm locations. There are many examples (such as the ones listed above) that provide guidance on how the relative significance of landscapes should be measured. In Victoria, the Coastal Spaces Landscape Assessment Study (Planisphere, for the Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2006) identified the different levels of significance (local, state and national) for all landscapes along the Victorian coastline (with state and national being the highest priority for application of planning controls). The methodology used in determining levels of significance is outlined below: Apply the ‘Visual’ Significance Criterion A single criterion is used to assess whether a landscape is visually significant: The landscape is significant for its visual qualities, including landform features, views, edges or contrasts, and for its predominantly natural or undeveloped character, in which development is absent or clearly subordinate to natural landscape characteristics. Visual significance is determined with reference to the ‘landscape components’ referred to in the criterion: landform features; views; edges or contrasts; and natural or undeveloped character. These are rated as having moderate, high or exceptional visual qualities, as shown below: Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines – 2 July 2010 Page 95
Page 1:
EPHC National Wind Farm Development
Page 5:
Acknowledgements These Guidelines h
Page 8 and 9:
A.6.1 Site selection 28 A.6.2 Proje
Page 10 and 11:
E.7 Technical discussion of key con
Page 12 and 13:
The 20/20 target is challenging; ho
Page 14 and 15:
Table 1-1 Elements of a ‘wind far
Page 16 and 17:
2 Principles for responsible wind f
Page 18 and 19:
3 Wind Farm Specific Issues The spe
Page 20 and 21:
Specific noise limits are not provi
Page 22 and 23:
3.5 Shadow flicker The issue Shadow
Page 24 and 25:
Guidance notes Heritage issues are
Page 26 and 27:
Table 4-1 Typical decision process
Page 28 and 29:
The studies and community consultat
Page 31 and 32:
A Community and Stakeholder Consult
Page 33 and 34:
• Responsive There is a comm
Page 35 and 36:
Figure A-1 IAP2 Public Participatio
Page 37 and 38:
Specific components which should be
Page 39 and 40:
Figure A-2 Example of Good Practice
Page 41 and 42:
Recording the occurrence and outcom
Page 43 and 44:
A.6.6 Decommissioning Planning & Co
Page 45 and 46:
Potential Stakeholders Consultation
Page 47 and 48:
B Noise B.1 Introduction This Appen
Page 49 and 50:
the converse. These Guidelines reco
Page 51 and 52:
The Standard should form the basis
Page 53 and 54: Stage and methodology Construction
Page 55 and 56: Other noise-sensitive uses such as
Page 57 and 58: Table B-2 Existing state and territ
Page 59 and 60: Establish background noise monitori
Page 61 and 62: As noted in Section 6.3.1 of AS4959
Page 63 and 64: predicted levels are significantly
Page 65 and 66: Prepare expert evidence (as require
Page 67 and 68: Undertake unattended monitoring to
Page 69 and 70: assessment of wind farm noise emiss
Page 71 and 72: B.4.5 Decommissioning Noise-related
Page 73 and 74: If a significant amount of time has
Page 75 and 76: B.7 Technical discussion of key con
Page 77 and 78: The HGC Engineering report 10 also
Page 79 and 80: C Landscape C.1 Introduction This A
Page 81 and 82: • Cumulative impacts “Cumulativ
Page 83 and 84: C.2 Overview of Methodologies Figur
Page 85 and 86: C.3 Task Methodologies C.3.1 Projec
Page 87 and 88: • State Relevant State herita
Page 89 and 90: The preliminary landscape character
Page 91 and 92: • Identifying and describing (in
Page 93 and 94: Advanced photomontages should also
Page 95 and 96: C.4.2 Visual Impact Assessment The
Page 97 and 98: C.4.2.4 Assessment of cumulative im
Page 99 and 100: the implementation of agreed change
Page 101 and 102: Figure C-2 IBRA mapping of Australi
Page 103: Table C-4 Mapping of landscape char
Page 107 and 108: Consider ‘Supporting Evidence’
Page 109 and 110: information available for other sit
Page 111 and 112: Figure C-4 Example of viewshed mapp
Page 113 and 114: Figure C-6 Example of photomontages
Page 115 and 116: communicate broad-scale ideas and p
Page 117 and 118: Table C-5 Mapping other wind farms
Page 119 and 120: C.7.9 Glossary & acronyms Australia
Page 121: Viewpoint The point from which a vi
Page 124 and 125: D.1.2 Underlying approach The under
Page 126 and 127: All of the above is generally appli
Page 128 and 129: the operational wind farm is aimed
Page 130 and 131: D.4 Task methodologies D.4.1 Site S
Page 132 and 133: area as it was not collected accord
Page 134 and 135: used throughout these Guidelines as
Page 136 and 137: wind farms. Such data from existing
Page 138 and 139: considered acceptable, undesirable,
Page 140 and 141: construction phase are identified d
Page 142 and 143: Searches for dead birds and bats ar
Page 144 and 145: D.5 Cumulative impacts D.5.1 Defini
Page 146 and 147: in the absence of any turbine colli
Page 148 and 149: that it was first observed. Where m
Page 150 and 151: e the case that assessment for bats
Page 152 and 153: Department of Primary Industries, W
Page 154 and 155:
Percival, S.M. 2003, Birds and wind
Page 157 and 158:
E Shadow Flicker E.1 Introduction T
Page 159 and 160:
• The use of recreational facilit
Page 161 and 162:
• The method is inherently linked
Page 163 and 164:
Table E-1 Recommended exposure limi
Page 165 and 166:
E.4.4 Construction Assessment of th
Page 167 and 168:
E.7 Technical discussion of key con
Page 169 and 170:
Figure E-4 Variation in shading wit
Page 171 and 172:
common practice varies between one
Page 173:
as the actual limit, rather than th
Page 176 and 177:
likely to be obstructed. Radiocommu
Page 178 and 179:
Licensed radiocommunications servic
Page 180 and 181:
Figure F-1 EMI mitigation methodolo
Page 182 and 183:
F.4 Task methodologies F.4.1 Projec
Page 184 and 185:
Expected timeframe for evaluation r
Page 186 and 187:
The near field zone can be calculat
Page 188 and 189:
Develop mitigation strategy As a st
Page 190 and 191:
aseline RF survey which involves th
Page 193 and 194:
G Wind Farm Development Process G.1
Page 195 and 196:
Project Sub-stages Activities to be
Page 197 and 198:
Preliminary Technical Studies Issue
Page 199 and 200:
Planning application (PA2) The plan
Page 201 and 202:
Develop mitigation strategy Finalis
Page 203 and 204:
Environmental Management Plans Issu
Page 205 and 206:
Monitoring: confirmation (O3) Confi
Page 207 and 208:
Decommissioning (D2) Once a decisio
show all

Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?