Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Planning to reduce predicted impacts is considerably more cost effective at this point in<br />
development of a project than implementation of ‘active’ management interventions<br />
aimed at reduction of impacts after a wind farm is in operation. The latter may prove to be<br />
necessary during the operational life of a wind farm but their efficacy will always be<br />
uncertain until tested for a given location and species. Achievement of an acceptable<br />
level of impact on the population of any bird or bat population should be integral to the<br />
planning of a wind farm, and must not be dependent on instigation of ‘active’ reduction<br />
or mitigation measures once the facility is operating. ‘Active’ management measures<br />
should remain only as options available to be tested in the event that they are<br />
demonstrably necessary during the life of the wind farm.<br />
Evaluation of predicted residual impacts on populations of key species<br />
Principal question:<br />
Purpose:<br />
Methods:<br />
Will any residual risk have an important impact on population function of key<br />
taxa<br />
To determine if the potential risk of loss identified in the previous phases, after<br />
mitigation effects are considered, is significant to the population in question.<br />
For this stage, the studies will include:<br />
• Assessment of acceptability of predicted mortalities<br />
This phase will ascertain the ecological importance or otherwise of any impacts on the<br />
populations of key taxa that might result from the proposed wind farm following mitigation<br />
or reduction of potential impacts as identified in Assessment of any reduction or mitigation<br />
of impacts that can be achieved (page 128). Wherever feasible and applicable, this part<br />
of the assessment should account for any contribution these impacts might make to a<br />
cumulative impact from other wind farms (see Section D.5).<br />
At completion of this task a final assessment can be made of whether the number of<br />
mortalities expected to occur over the life of the facility are ecologically and socially<br />
acceptable. If so, the bird and bat impact assessment process will generally be complete<br />
at this point. If there is a residual risk of some mortality of any key species, a plan for<br />
management of relevant bird and bat issues at the operational wind farm will usually be<br />
required as a condition of approval. It is important that conditions to be met by the<br />
operational wind farm are based on levels of ecologically acceptable impact for the<br />
population of a key species over the projected life of the wind farm, as identified in this<br />
final phase of assessment.<br />
If the number of mortalities expected to occur over the life of the facility are not<br />
ecologically and socially acceptable, the proponent may choose to withdraw the<br />
proposal from the statutory assessment process. If the proponent chooses to proceed with<br />
the statutory assessment process, this information will be considered by the relevant<br />
authorities when they make their decision on the approval, or otherwise, of the proposed<br />
wind farm. .<br />
D.4.4 Construction<br />
At the commencement of construction, plans for management of relevant bird and bat<br />
issues and associated documentation should be reviewed to ensure necessary actions are<br />
identified.<br />
The physical construction of a wind farm does not usually entail particular impacts on birds<br />
and bats other than those of habitat loss or modification which should be included in<br />
assessment outlined in Assessment of any reduction or mitigation of impacts that can be<br />
achieved (page 128). In a case where unusual or specific potential impacts of the<br />
<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> – 2 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2010</strong> Page 129