20.01.2015 Views

Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010

Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010

Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

D.4.3 Planning Application<br />

The following tasks are likely requirements of any assessment process.<br />

Quantitative assessment of risk of fatal collisions for key species<br />

If preliminary assessments outlined in previous phases determine there is potential for<br />

mortalities of key species resulting from interactions with turbines, then investigation to<br />

quantify this risk will be required as follows.<br />

Principal question:<br />

Purpose:<br />

Methods:<br />

What is the quantitative risk to key species of collision mortalities<br />

To quantify the inherent risk to key species of the wind farm as proposed.<br />

For this stage, the studies will include:<br />

• qualitative<br />

<br />

Geographic Information Systems – habitat models<br />

behavioural studies<br />

• quantitative<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

population surveys<br />

collection of data for estimation of annual number of flights at risk of<br />

collision<br />

collision risk modelling to predict potential mortalities<br />

The definition of exactly which species are “key species” will need to be confirmed by the<br />

relevant authorities before this task can be finalised.<br />

Habitat modelling, mapping of territories and/or mapping activity patterns of key species<br />

at the site should be undertaken to gain insight into whether parts of the site pose greater<br />

risk of collision than others. Results may have application in design of a turbine layout to<br />

avoid or reduce impacts. (see also Assessment of any reduction or mitigation of impacts<br />

that can be achieved, page 128).<br />

Risk modelling approaches can range from the use of sophisticated mathematical models<br />

to qualitative evaluation and the approach used will depend on the availability of<br />

information. Collision modelling is the preferred method of assessing risk and is likely to be<br />

required by the relevant authorities when sufficient information is obtainable.<br />

When a numerical assessment of potential impact on particular species is undertaken, the<br />

appropriate approach will be use of a peer-reviewed mathematical risk model. A number<br />

of such models are in use internationally. This type of collision risk modelling is a predictive<br />

mechanism used to quantify the potential annual number of flights made by key species<br />

that are at risk of collision and may result in bird or bat mortalities. Inputs required to<br />

undertake such modelling include standardised bird or bat utilisation data (quantified as<br />

outlined below); number and geographic layout of turbines; and dimensions and other<br />

parameters of turbines. Pre-requisites for an outcome measured in terms of an expected<br />

annual number of mortalities, are both the number of individuals that might interact with<br />

turbines and the estimated number of their flights that are at risk of collision.<br />

The ultimate justification of any mathematical model is how well its predictions are verified<br />

by measured outcomes. To date there are no examples of Australian wind farms where<br />

both pre-construction bird utilisation studies and post-construction mortality monitoring<br />

have been undertaken sufficiently rigorously to confirm the accuracy of the relevant<br />

collision risk model with a high degree of confidence. In the absence of such verification,<br />

the predictions of any collision risk model should be evaluated against any other available<br />

indicators of likely mortalities, such as experience with comparable bird species at existing<br />

<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> – 2 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2010</strong> Page 125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!