Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Cumulative impacts<br />
“Cumulative landscape and visual effects result from additional changes to the<br />
landscape or visual amenity caused by the proposed development in conjunction<br />
with other developments (associated with or separate to it), or actions that occurred<br />
in the past, present or are likely to occur in the foreseeable future. They may also<br />
affect the way in which the landscape is experienced”. 15<br />
Scottish Natural Heritage (2005) describes a range of potential cumulative landscape<br />
impacts of wind farms on landscapes, including:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Combined visibility (whether two or more wind farms will be visible from one<br />
location).<br />
Sequential visibility (e.g. the effect of seeing two or more wind farms along a<br />
single journey, e.g. road or walking trail).<br />
The visual compatibility of different wind farms in the same vicinity.<br />
Perceived or actual change in land use across a character type or region.<br />
Loss of a characteristic element (e.g. viewing type or feature) across a character<br />
type caused by developments across that character type.<br />
Cumulative impacts may also occur where there are no other wind farms in the area,<br />
but by virtue of combination with other major infrastructure or large scale<br />
developments (e.g. industrial, urban, large-scale agricultural) and/ or direct or indirect<br />
landscape changes (e.g. vegetation clearing) which may alter the overall character<br />
or values of an area.<br />
The assessment of potential cumulative impacts should include proposed<br />
developments in the region which have been approved but not yet built. Relevant<br />
authorities may provide direction as to the extent to which proposed developments<br />
should be considered in assessing potential cumulative impacts. There may, for<br />
example, be different considerations for developments which have been approved,<br />
but not yet constructed, and those awaiting development approvals.<br />
Cumulative impacts need to be considered in relation to dynamic as well as static<br />
viewpoints. The experience of driving along a tourist road, for example, needs to be<br />
considered as a dynamic sequence of views and visual impacts, not just as the<br />
cumulative impact of several developments on one location. The viewer may only<br />
see one wind farm at a time, but if each successive stretch of the road is dominated<br />
by views of a wind farm, then that can be argued to be a cumulative visual impact.<br />
Cumulative impacts may be visual and aesthetic, but they can also occur in relation<br />
to non-visual values about landscape. Non-visual values include sounds/noise,<br />
associations, memories, knowledge and experiences or other cultural or natural<br />
values. To give an example, locating four wind farms in a valley previously best known<br />
for its historic wineries might change the balance of perception about the valley’s<br />
associational character, irrespective of whether all four wind farms were sited in a<br />
single viewshed.<br />
• Management and mitigation<br />
Management and mitigation refers to actions taken to reduce or eliminate impacts as<br />
a result of the full landscape assessment and visual impact assessment. It is<br />
imperative to note that mitigation measures are very limited for wind farm<br />
development and therefore general location and site selection is of utmost<br />
importance.<br />
15 <strong>Guidelines</strong> for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Second Edition, Spon Press, p85<br />
<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> – 2 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2010</strong> Page 71