Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
used throughout these <strong>Guidelines</strong> as a term of convenience for all causes of bird and bat<br />
deaths that may result from interactions with wind turbines. These include barotrauma,<br />
potential traumatic effects of turbulence caused by rotors, and direct collision strikes (see<br />
Section D.6 for a glossary of terms).<br />
Account should be taken of the fact that mortalities due to turbine collisions are either not<br />
possible or are not considered to be an issue for some species of birds. Assessment of<br />
collision risk for the following categories of birds is not necessary or is unlikely to be required<br />
for most sites within Australia:<br />
• Introduced and feral taxa.<br />
• Flightless and near-flightless birds.<br />
• Other taxa that rarely fly within or through rotor-swept-height.<br />
Some species routinely fly within or through rotor-swept-height (which for current turbines is<br />
generally in the range 30-130 metres above the ground), but many other species rarely if<br />
ever fly in that height range. Flight-height data collected in south-eastern Australia<br />
indicates that many bird taxa rarely fly above 25 metres (Biosis Research unpublished<br />
data) and that interactions with turbines do not need to be assessed for these birds other<br />
than for exceptional sites or circumstances (see also Section D.7). The potential for<br />
exceptional circumstances should be evaluated for each wind farm. Examples may<br />
include locations on defined routes of migration or other long-distance movements if birds<br />
there fly at greater heights than they do during the majority of their routine activities. Unless<br />
the species in question is also a key taxon, assessment is unlikely to be required.<br />
All Australian bat species have capacity to fly within rotor-swept height and, while some<br />
may do so less than others, current knowledge is insufficient to suggest the exclusion of any<br />
key bat taxa from this component of the assessment.<br />
If key taxa with capacity to fly at rotor height are known from the site, further preliminary<br />
investigations of those taxa will be necessary. For resident species, their home range<br />
requirements should be considered and for all key species that might use the site their<br />
foraging, roosting, breeding and other species-specific needs are to be considered at this<br />
phase. Other aspects that should be given preliminary consideration relative to potential<br />
risks for the species involved are typical sizes of flocks, behaviours, where they are most<br />
readily detected and particular behaviours or habitat preferences that may expose them<br />
to high risk.<br />
This phase does not require full or detailed assessments, and information gathering at this<br />
phase does not need to be of a standard that might provide inputs to detailed risk<br />
assessment. The information does, however guide later evidence gathering studies, and is<br />
critical to ensure full alignment of pre- and post-construction assessments using BACI<br />
(Before – After – Control – Impact) designs. Local or otherwise expert knowledge gleaned<br />
during this preliminary phase may be supported by targeted pilot studies to establish<br />
background methodologies and necessary parameters that will guide later phase surveys<br />
and assessments. Pilot surveys are short field studies to further identify and to scope<br />
potential issues. They allow approximation of relevant information such as typical<br />
population on site, number of movements on site, seasonal dependencies, observability<br />
and detectability. If occurrence of key taxa at the site is likely to be seasonal, then pilot<br />
studies must be timed to maximise potential to obtain such information.<br />
The principal purpose of such trials is to establish a sound basis for the need and<br />
subsequent design of any more detailed investigations of risk for key species specific to the<br />
site.<br />
If there is an identified potential for a key species to interact with turbines, the assessment<br />
should proceed to the next phase. If not, relevant authorities may determine that no<br />
further assessment of risk is required for birds or bats.<br />
Page 124 <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> – 2 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2010</strong>