Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• An example boundary is shown that represents an area that may be affected by<br />
shadow flicker, while not being significantly affected by noise.<br />
Table 4-3<br />
Typical areas of shadow flicker from a single turbine showing number of hours of shadow flicker per<br />
year<br />
There are a range of impacts that have been suggested as being a consequence of<br />
shadow flicker. Each of these have been examined and it has been determined that the<br />
risk of some of the suggested impacts is, in fact, negligible and does not need to be<br />
addressed in the guidelines (see Section E.2.2).<br />
The key risk associated with shadow flicker is annoyance of residents, and this risk is<br />
addressed in the <strong>Guidelines</strong>.<br />
Shadow flicker can theoretically extend many kilometres from a wind turbine. However,<br />
the intensity of the shadows decreases with distance. While acknowledging that different<br />
individuals have different levels of sensitivity and may be annoyed by different levels of<br />
shadow intensity, these guidelines limit assessment to moderate levels of intensity (i.e. well<br />
above the minimum theoretically detectable threshold) commensurate with the nature of<br />
the impact and the environment in which it is experienced. Details of the intensity of<br />
shadow to be considered are provided in Section E.4.2.<br />
Annoyance of residents can occur over a long term basis if they are repeatedly subject to<br />
shadow flicker, or on a short term basis as a consequence of an extended period of<br />
continuous exposure. Both are considered important impacts. However for any location<br />
within Australia, the recommended limits for continuous exposure are inherently satisfied if<br />
the limits for long term exposure on an intermittent basis are satisfied. The methodology<br />
reflects this, requiring only assessment of the long term exposure.<br />
E.2.2<br />
Issues not addressed in the <strong>Guidelines</strong><br />
Annoyance of land users other than residents<br />
There is a negligible risk associated with impact on amenity of land users other than<br />
residents, such as where a recreation facility such as a park or gardens experiences<br />
shadow flicker. These risks are not covered in the <strong>Guidelines</strong> for the following reasons:<br />
Page 148 <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> – 2 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2010</strong>