Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Establish background noise monitoring requirements<br />
• Select relevant receivers<br />
Preliminary noise emission predictions should be used to identify ‘relevant receivers’;<br />
that is, those noise-sensitive receivers where the preliminary noise predictions indicate<br />
that the minimum noise level limit (including any adjustments for noise characteristics)<br />
may be exceeded. In order to establish noise criteria based on a ‘minimum noise level<br />
limit + background’ basis, background noise monitoring will be required at any<br />
receivers (or a receiver judged to be representative of a group of such receivers)<br />
identified as relevant receivers.<br />
If the preliminary predicted levels of wind farm noise emission are less than the<br />
minimum noise level limit (including any adjustments for noise characteristics) for the<br />
wind speed of maximum noise emission at each receiver, background noise<br />
monitoring will generally not be required as there is minimal risk that receivers will be<br />
adversely affected by wind farm noise emission. AS4959–<strong>2010</strong> notes the following<br />
exception:<br />
However, if a location is particularly sheltered and wind-related background noise<br />
may be low even when wind speeds on the wind farm itself are high, measurements<br />
should still be taken.<br />
AS4959–<strong>2010</strong> also notes that the assessment of background noise levels at the<br />
locations of future development may be of little benefit, as the noise environment is<br />
likely to change significantly should the development take place.<br />
AS4959–<strong>2010</strong> further notes that:<br />
When considering a group of receivers it is acceptable to select as relevant the<br />
receiver that is likely to be representative of the worst case situation, e.g. a house<br />
that has very few likely sources of wind induced background noise that is located<br />
amongst a group of nearby houses.<br />
Further discussion of representative dwellings is provided in Section B.5.3.<br />
• Review historical wind data<br />
Section 6.3.1 of AS4959–<strong>2010</strong> notes:<br />
The wind direction or wind directions which will result in the maximum noise impact<br />
from the WTG or wind farm at relevant receivers, seasonal variation in the<br />
occurrence of these wind directions and the likelihood of obtaining data with the<br />
wind from these directions should also be considered prior to the commencement<br />
of monitoring.<br />
Annual wind historical data should be reviewed to establish the range of wind speeds<br />
that are likely to occur at the wind farm site and that should therefore be represented<br />
in the monitored data. <strong>Wind</strong> direction data may also be similarly reviewed.<br />
In addition, a review of air stability conditions should be carried out. Where a<br />
significant trend for stable air is found to occur at the site (particularly during nighttime<br />
hours), this should be accounted for both in the data covered by the monitoring<br />
and also in the setting of noise level limits and the assessment of noise impact from the<br />
wind farm.<br />
Review requirements for wind monitoring data<br />
Subsequent phases of the assessment process require monitoring both of background<br />
noise levels and, potentially, post-construction noise levels of the operational wind farm.<br />
Although these future phases can be 12 months or more away, it is recommended that the<br />
proponent review these future requirements with regard to wind monitoring and ensure<br />
they can be achieved with the proposed wind monitoring strategy.<br />
<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> – 2 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2010</strong> Page 49