Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table B-4<br />
Suggested methods for assessment of noise characteristics<br />
Noise<br />
characteristic<br />
Amplitude<br />
modulation<br />
Impulsiveness<br />
Suggested assessment<br />
procedure<br />
Tasmania Department<br />
of Primary Industries,<br />
Water and<br />
Environment (2004)<br />
Noise measurement<br />
procedures manual,<br />
Also Western<br />
Australian<br />
Environmental<br />
Protection (Noise)<br />
Regulations 1997<br />
Australian Standard<br />
1055.1:1997 Acoustics<br />
– Description and<br />
measurement of<br />
environmental noise<br />
Part 1: General<br />
Procedures<br />
Comments<br />
Amplitude modulation may be present where there is a<br />
greater than normal degree of fluctuation of sound level.<br />
The suggested assessment procedure indicates the<br />
presence of amplitude modulation where there is a<br />
regular, cyclic and audible variation in sound level of more<br />
than 3dB.<br />
It should be noted that LA90,T may not be appropriate for<br />
assessing amplitude modulation. LAeq, LA01 or LAMax indices<br />
may be more suited to identification measurements.<br />
Further, it is noted that any assessment of amplitude<br />
modulation should take place at the Receiver location<br />
being assessed. It is not suitable to carry out an assessment<br />
within the wind farm site as, at the Receiver location,<br />
emission from several different turbines may be contributing<br />
to the observed effect. Also, the measurement position<br />
should not be unduly affected by facade reflections in the<br />
area immediately around the measurement location.<br />
This assessment requires the use of a sound level meter with<br />
fast response and impulse response time weightings. It is<br />
recommended that impulsiveness assessments be carried<br />
out on calibrated digital recordings of the suspected<br />
impulsive sound, so that the impulsive and fast time<br />
weighting may be applied to the same audio sample. In<br />
some cases, impulsiveness may be indicated using the<br />
AS1055.1 assessment method when, subjectively, it is not<br />
considered to be present. These cases should be discussed<br />
with the relevant authority<br />
Infrasound DIN 45680:1997<br />
Measurement and<br />
evaluation of lowfrequency<br />
environmental noise,<br />
Deutsches Institut für<br />
Normung<br />
DIN45680 does not prescribe acceptable noise limits but<br />
discusses a method for assessing perceptibility. Although a<br />
given low frequency noise or infrasound may be<br />
perceptible, this does not imply a negative effect on<br />
health.<br />
The assessment frequency range of DIN 45680:1997 extends<br />
down to 8Hz and so may exclude some frequencies which<br />
are considered part of the infrasound range. Complaints<br />
resulting from noise emission in this extremely low frequency<br />
range are considered unlikely. Nonetheless, it is important<br />
to recognise this limitation of the assessment method.<br />
Low<br />
frequency<br />
noise<br />
Tonality<br />
DIN 45680:1997<br />
Measurement and<br />
evaluation of lowfrequency<br />
environmental noise,<br />
Deutsches Institut für<br />
Normung<br />
Assessment<br />
procedures as<br />
identified in Section<br />
7.2 of AS4959–<strong>2010</strong><br />
The noise level threshold curves included in the standard<br />
are reasonably conservative. However, they are based on<br />
a 50% threshold level and some research suggests that a<br />
10-12dB margin to the 10% threshold may exist.<br />
Accordingly, it may be that some individuals can hear a<br />
sound level which is measured to be less than the threshold<br />
limit. Where the measured level is within 12dB of the<br />
threshold value and the measured level is greater than the<br />
background noise level further investigative work is likely to<br />
be required.<br />
Note: The assessment method proposed for amplitude modulation should be considered as nominal<br />
and is proposed in the absence of a more suitable method specific to wind farms. It may be used as<br />
an indicator of amplitude modulation; however, the assessment should be carried out in conjunction<br />
with a subjective assessment of the sound by the assessor and the relevant authority. It may be more<br />
suitable in this case to explore adjustments in the operation of particular turbines under certain<br />
meteorological conditions, for example by using noise management settings at particular wind<br />
speeds, to try and alleviate the issue<br />
Page 60 <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guidelines</strong> – 2 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2010</strong>