Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 1-1 Elements of a ‘wind farm’ development 1.8 Who is the audience for the Guidelines These Guidelines have been written for a wide range of individuals or interest groups involved with wind farms. Some of these stakeholders have been identified below. • The proponent A proponent is any entity or individual who seeks to develop or operate a wind farm. This may include wind prospecting companies, renewable energy generators, wind farm construction companies, or private or public businesses seeking to use wind power to supplement their electricity supply. • The community The community includes residents, landowners, community and indigenous groups, businesses (and their customers), tourists visiting the region, and the broader community in the region that have an interest in the development of a wind farm at a particular location from an economic, social or environmental perspective. • Relevant authority A relevant authority is a government body or person that assesses applications against legal and policy requirements for wind farm developments. They may also have an enforcement role ensuring developments comply with all consent conditions. Relevant authorities may include local councils, state or territory Ministers or government agencies. The Commonwealth Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts has specific responsibilities solely in relation to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act)]. • Interested stakeholder An interested stakeholder is a person, business or organisation who has an interest or association with a wind farm. This interest can often be much narrower than the community, generally focussing on individual issues or groups of issues. Other interested stakeholders may include a wide range of government agencies related to environment, energy and heritage issues, the Bureau of Meteorology, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Department of Defence, fire authorities, bird observers clubs, and telecommunications businesses. Page 4 Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines – 2 July 2010
A more comprehensive list of groups who may need to be consulted with during wind farm development, operation or decommissioning can be found in Appendix A. 1.9 How will these Guidelines be used These Guidelines are intended to be referred to within the planning process of the relevant state or territory. They are intended to inform the considerations of the relevant authority when assessing a proposal for a wind farm. They are also intended to make those considerations more consistent and transparent to those outside of that planning process. Once a planning application is submitted, relevant authorities will assess the application based on a balanced consideration of the individual merits of the specific wind farm development. Such an assessment will weigh the benefits provided by the project (particularly in relation to government climate change policies) against the potential impacts on the environment, neighbouring landowners and local communities and what measures can be put in place to mitigate any such impacts. When conducting their assessment, relevant authorities are expected to have regard to the principles of wind farm development outlined in the next section. They may also have regard to the attached technical methodologies. Wind farm proponents can use these Guidelines to ensure they structure their application to anticipate the requirements of the relevant authority and facilitate the assessment process. They are also intended to provide a suitable level of information to the community about the process and scope of wind farm developments. The guidelines are not intended to be mandatory; every jurisdiction has a different statutory process for assessing wind farm proposals and it is not the intention of the Guidelines to change these. Opting for the release of draft Guidelines allows each jurisdiction to assess how the Guidelines could be best adopted within their processes. Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines – 2 July 2010 Page 5
Page 1: EPHC National Wind Farm Development
Page 5: Acknowledgements These Guidelines h
Page 8 and 9: A.6.1 Site selection 28 A.6.2 Proje
Page 10 and 11: E.7 Technical discussion of key con
Page 12 and 13: The 20/20 target is challenging; ho
Page 16 and 17: 2 Principles for responsible wind f
Page 18 and 19: 3 Wind Farm Specific Issues The spe
Page 20 and 21: Specific noise limits are not provi
Page 22 and 23: 3.5 Shadow flicker The issue Shadow
Page 24 and 25: Guidance notes Heritage issues are
Page 26 and 27: Table 4-1 Typical decision process
Page 28 and 29: The studies and community consultat
Page 31 and 32: A Community and Stakeholder Consult
Page 33 and 34: • Responsive There is a comm
Page 35 and 36: Figure A-1 IAP2 Public Participatio
Page 37 and 38: Specific components which should be
Page 39 and 40: Figure A-2 Example of Good Practice
Page 41 and 42: Recording the occurrence and outcom
Page 43 and 44: A.6.6 Decommissioning Planning & Co
Page 45 and 46: Potential Stakeholders Consultation
Page 47 and 48: B Noise B.1 Introduction This Appen
Page 49 and 50: the converse. These Guidelines reco
Page 51 and 52: The Standard should form the basis
Page 53 and 54: Stage and methodology Construction
Page 55 and 56: Other noise-sensitive uses such as
Page 57 and 58: Table B-2 Existing state and territ
Page 59 and 60: Establish background noise monitori
Page 61 and 62: As noted in Section 6.3.1 of AS4959
Page 63 and 64: predicted levels are significantly
Page 65 and 66:
Prepare expert evidence (as require
Page 67 and 68:
Undertake unattended monitoring to
Page 69 and 70:
assessment of wind farm noise emiss
Page 71 and 72:
B.4.5 Decommissioning Noise-related
Page 73 and 74:
If a significant amount of time has
Page 75 and 76:
B.7 Technical discussion of key con
Page 77 and 78:
The HGC Engineering report 10 also
Page 79 and 80:
C Landscape C.1 Introduction This A
Page 81 and 82:
• Cumulative impacts “Cumulativ
Page 83 and 84:
C.2 Overview of Methodologies Figur
Page 85 and 86:
C.3 Task Methodologies C.3.1 Projec
Page 87 and 88:
• State Relevant State herita
Page 89 and 90:
The preliminary landscape character
Page 91 and 92:
• Identifying and describing (in
Page 93 and 94:
Advanced photomontages should also
Page 95 and 96:
C.4.2 Visual Impact Assessment The
Page 97 and 98:
C.4.2.4 Assessment of cumulative im
Page 99 and 100:
the implementation of agreed change
Page 101 and 102:
Figure C-2 IBRA mapping of Australi
Page 103 and 104:
Table C-4 Mapping of landscape char
Page 105 and 106:
C.7.2 Levels of significance What a
Page 107 and 108:
Consider ‘Supporting Evidence’
Page 109 and 110:
information available for other sit
Page 111 and 112:
Figure C-4 Example of viewshed mapp
Page 113 and 114:
Figure C-6 Example of photomontages
Page 115 and 116:
communicate broad-scale ideas and p
Page 117 and 118:
Table C-5 Mapping other wind farms
Page 119 and 120:
C.7.9 Glossary & acronyms Australia
Page 121:
Viewpoint The point from which a vi
Page 124 and 125:
D.1.2 Underlying approach The under
Page 126 and 127:
All of the above is generally appli
Page 128 and 129:
the operational wind farm is aimed
Page 130 and 131:
D.4 Task methodologies D.4.1 Site S
Page 132 and 133:
area as it was not collected accord
Page 134 and 135:
used throughout these Guidelines as
Page 136 and 137:
wind farms. Such data from existing
Page 138 and 139:
considered acceptable, undesirable,
Page 140 and 141:
construction phase are identified d
Page 142 and 143:
Searches for dead birds and bats ar
Page 144 and 145:
D.5 Cumulative impacts D.5.1 Defini
Page 146 and 147:
in the absence of any turbine colli
Page 148 and 149:
that it was first observed. Where m
Page 150 and 151:
e the case that assessment for bats
Page 152 and 153:
Department of Primary Industries, W
Page 154 and 155:
Percival, S.M. 2003, Birds and wind
Page 157 and 158:
E Shadow Flicker E.1 Introduction T
Page 159 and 160:
• The use of recreational facilit
Page 161 and 162:
• The method is inherently linked
Page 163 and 164:
Table E-1 Recommended exposure limi
Page 165 and 166:
E.4.4 Construction Assessment of th
Page 167 and 168:
E.7 Technical discussion of key con
Page 169 and 170:
Figure E-4 Variation in shading wit
Page 171 and 172:
common practice varies between one
Page 173:
as the actual limit, rather than th
Page 176 and 177:
likely to be obstructed. Radiocommu
Page 178 and 179:
Licensed radiocommunications servic
Page 180 and 181:
Figure F-1 EMI mitigation methodolo
Page 182 and 183:
F.4 Task methodologies F.4.1 Projec
Page 184 and 185:
Expected timeframe for evaluation r
Page 186 and 187:
The near field zone can be calculat
Page 188 and 189:
Develop mitigation strategy As a st
Page 190 and 191:
aseline RF survey which involves th
Page 193 and 194:
G Wind Farm Development Process G.1
Page 195 and 196:
Project Sub-stages Activities to be
Page 197 and 198:
Preliminary Technical Studies Issue
Page 199 and 200:
Planning application (PA2) The plan
Page 201 and 202:
Develop mitigation strategy Finalis
Page 203 and 204:
Environmental Management Plans Issu
Page 205 and 206:
Monitoring: confirmation (O3) Confi
Page 207 and 208:
Decommissioning (D2) Once a decisio
show all

Draft National Wind Farm Development Guidelines - July 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?