States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives
States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives
States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>of</strong> the Secretary General <strong>of</strong> the United Nations and <strong>of</strong> <strong>States</strong><br />
Parties, are set out in Part IV (Articles 28 – 30) <strong>of</strong> the ICCPR. 212<br />
The several competences <strong>of</strong> the Committee are to be found in<br />
Articles 40 (State Parties’ reporting obligations and basic<br />
procedure), Articles 41 and 42 (Inter‐State communications and<br />
the role <strong>of</strong> the Committee including conciliation) and in the First<br />
Optional Protocol (individual communications). 213<br />
4.2.2 The Reporting Procedure<br />
The reporting obligation is the main instrument <strong>of</strong> supervision in<br />
the ICCPR, and is compulsory <strong>for</strong> all <strong>States</strong> Parties. There are three<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> reports: (a) Initial Reports; (b) Periodic Reports; and (c)<br />
Supplemental Reports.<br />
Under Article 40 (1) and (2), a State Party’s initial report must be<br />
submitted within one year <strong>of</strong> accession to the Covenant,<br />
describing the measures it has adopted to give effect to the rights<br />
established in the Covenant, and must also include reference to<br />
any constraints in giving effect to same. The Committee has<br />
decided in terms <strong>of</strong> Article 40 (1) (b) that periodic reports are to<br />
be submitted every Live years by <strong>States</strong>. In exceptional cases, it<br />
may also call <strong>for</strong> special reports, and in others, supplemental<br />
reports in order clarify or seek fuller in<strong>for</strong>mation. The Committee<br />
212<br />
See Javaid Rehman (2002) International Human Rights Law: A <br />
Practical Approach (London: Longman): Ch.4, pp. 83‐84.<br />
213<br />
See Steiner in Alston & Craw<strong>for</strong>d (2000), op cit; Dominic McGoldrick<br />
(1991) The Human Rights Committee (Clarendon; Ox<strong>for</strong>d): Chs.2‐3;<br />
Rosalyn Higgins (1991) ‘United Nations Human Rights Committee’ in<br />
Robert Blackburn & John Taylor (1991) Human Rights <strong>for</strong> the 1990s <br />
(London: Mansell) p.67; Ineke BoereLijn (1995) ‘Towards a Strong System <br />
<strong>of</strong> Supervision’ 17 Human Rights Quarterly 766<br />
131