22.01.2015 Views

States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives

States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives

States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

empowers Parliament to add to, alter, or revoke any emergency<br />

regulation by resolution.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> Section 7, emergency regulations and any decision,<br />

order or rule made thereunder prevails over any other law. Part III<br />

<strong>of</strong> the PSO provides other rules, as special powers <strong>of</strong> the President,<br />

in matters connected with the exercise <strong>of</strong> emergency powers<br />

including calling out the armed <strong>for</strong>ces in aid <strong>of</strong> the civil power,<br />

procedure <strong>for</strong> arrest, detention and executive review <strong>of</strong> detention,<br />

and the suspension <strong>of</strong> certain provisions <strong>of</strong> the Code <strong>of</strong> Criminal<br />

Procedure. As noted above, Section 8 seeks to oust judicial review<br />

<strong>of</strong> anything done under the PSO. 284<br />

5.1.1
<strong>Emergency</strong>
Regulations<br />

There is a large number <strong>of</strong> emergency regulations currently in<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce, dealing with a wide array <strong>of</strong> matters including terrorist<br />

activities, special administrative arrangements, high security<br />

zones, procurement and so on. 285 For reasons <strong>of</strong> space, relevance<br />

and implications <strong>for</strong> the issues addressed in this book, however,<br />

the <strong>Emergency</strong> (Miscellaneous Provisions and Powers)<br />

284<br />

However, it was held in Siriwardena
v.
Liyanage (1983) 2 FRD 310, at<br />

329 that Section 8 does not preclude the court from examining and ruling<br />

upon the validity <strong>of</strong> an order made under any impugned emergency<br />

regulation, and further, ‘where an emergency regulation empowers an<br />

authority to make an order only if he is satisLied <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

facts, the Court can inquire whether it was reasonable <strong>for</strong> the authority to<br />

be satisLied <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> those facts. However, the evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

those facts is <strong>for</strong> the authority alone and the Court will not substitute its<br />

opinion <strong>for</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the authority.’ See Jayampathy Wickramaratne (2006)<br />

Fundamental
 Rights
 in
 Sri
 Lanka
 (2 nd Ed.) (Colombo: Stam<strong>for</strong>d Lake):<br />

pp.124‐126<br />

285<br />

See index <strong>of</strong> emergency regulations currently in <strong>for</strong>ce, infra<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!