22.01.2015 Views

States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives

States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives

States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

has also issued guidelines regarding the <strong>for</strong>m, content, and<br />

procedure <strong>for</strong> the submission <strong>of</strong> these reports. 214 In terms <strong>of</strong><br />

Article 40 (4), the Committee is required to study the State report<br />

and transmit its reports along with general comments to the State<br />

Party and to ECOSOC. The Committee provides the State Party an<br />

opportunity to introduce its report and answer questions<br />

(including questions relating to follow up measures from previous<br />

reporting cycles) prior to drafting and adopting its views on the<br />

State report. 215<br />

It has been pointed out that this approach <strong>of</strong> the Committee to the<br />

reporting procedure has engendered a more constructive<br />

relationship with State Parties. It seems to have encouraged <strong>States</strong><br />

to not only meet their obligations in respect <strong>of</strong> timely submission,<br />

but has also enhanced the quality and completeness <strong>of</strong> their<br />

reports, as well as the importance they place in responding to the<br />

Committee’s invitations to present and clarify such reports.<br />

However, there are several criticisms <strong>of</strong> the reporting procedure<br />

that have emerged over the years. 216 Some <strong>of</strong> the more trenchant<br />

<strong>of</strong> these relate to the neutral and general nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee’s annual reports (Article 45), precluding the<br />

opportunity to make State‐speciLic recommendations and<br />

comments; the <strong>for</strong>mal exclusion <strong>of</strong> NGOs and the limited role<br />

played by the specialised agencies; and, in the light <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Committee’s inability to independently en<strong>for</strong>ce its views where<br />

214<br />

Rehman (2002), op cit., p.84 et seq.<br />

215<br />

McGoldrick (1991), op cit, p.100<br />

216<br />

Ibid, p.98 et seq.<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!