States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives
States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives
States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
that <strong>of</strong> the person committing the act), or (g) creating a serious<br />
risk to public health and safety, or (h) is designed to interfere with<br />
or disrupt an electronic system; and which is aimed at (a)<br />
endangering the sovereignty and territorial integrity <strong>of</strong> Sri Lanka<br />
or any other recognised sovereign State, or (b) any other political<br />
or governmental change, or (c) compelling the government <strong>of</strong> Sri<br />
Lanka to do or abstain from doing any act, and includes any other<br />
unlawful activity which advocates or propagates such unlawful<br />
conduct. ‘SpeciLied terrorist activity’ is deLined as any <strong>of</strong>fence<br />
speciLied in the PTA, the PSO, Section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Money<br />
Laundering Act No. 5 <strong>of</strong> 2006, Section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Convention on the<br />
Suppression <strong>of</strong> Terrorist Financing Act No. 25 <strong>of</strong> 2005, and any<br />
<strong>of</strong>fence under Sections 114, 115, 116, 117, 121, 122, 128, 129 <strong>of</strong><br />
the Penal Code.<br />
On the face <strong>of</strong> the text, the wide, overbroad language <strong>of</strong> these<br />
regulations could lend themselves to abuse, in that, in addition to<br />
dealing with activities that the State could legitimately restrain or<br />
prohibit in the interests <strong>of</strong> national security and the suppression<br />
<strong>of</strong> terrorism, they could also serve to curtail legitimate democratic<br />
activity and fundamental freedoms, dissent and the autonomy <strong>of</strong><br />
civil society. In particular the wide range <strong>of</strong> activities prohibited by<br />
Regulation 6, 7 and 8, the deLinition <strong>of</strong> terrorism in Regulation 20<br />
and the immunity clause, Regulation 19. These provisions are<br />
overbroad, drafted in very wide language, and where <strong>of</strong>fences<br />
have not expressly been established, they allow <strong>for</strong> the possible<br />
criminalisation <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> legitimate activities <strong>of</strong> civil society,<br />
and could violate constitutionally protected fundamental rights.<br />
184