22.01.2015 Views

States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives

States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives

States of Emergency - Centre for Policy Alternatives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that <strong>of</strong> the person committing the act), or (g) creating a serious<br />

risk to public health and safety, or (h) is designed to interfere with<br />

or disrupt an electronic system; and which is aimed at (a)<br />

endangering the sovereignty and territorial integrity <strong>of</strong> Sri Lanka<br />

or any other recognised sovereign State, or (b) any other political<br />

or governmental change, or (c) compelling the government <strong>of</strong> Sri<br />

Lanka to do or abstain from doing any act, and includes any other<br />

unlawful activity which advocates or propagates such unlawful<br />

conduct. ‘SpeciLied terrorist activity’ is deLined as any <strong>of</strong>fence<br />

speciLied in the PTA, the PSO, Section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Money<br />

Laundering Act No. 5 <strong>of</strong> 2006, Section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Convention on the<br />

Suppression <strong>of</strong> Terrorist Financing Act No. 25 <strong>of</strong> 2005, and any<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence under Sections 114, 115, 116, 117, 121, 122, 128, 129 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Penal Code.<br />

On the face <strong>of</strong> the text, the wide, overbroad language <strong>of</strong> these<br />

regulations could lend themselves to abuse, in that, in addition to<br />

dealing with activities that the State could legitimately restrain or<br />

prohibit in the interests <strong>of</strong> national security and the suppression<br />

<strong>of</strong> terrorism, they could also serve to
curtail legitimate democratic<br />

activity and fundamental freedoms, dissent and the autonomy <strong>of</strong><br />

civil society. In particular the wide range <strong>of</strong> activities prohibited by<br />

Regulation 6, 7 and 8, the deLinition <strong>of</strong> terrorism in Regulation 20<br />

and the immunity clause, Regulation 19. These provisions are<br />

overbroad, drafted in very wide language, and where <strong>of</strong>fences<br />

have not expressly been established, they allow <strong>for</strong> the possible<br />

criminalisation <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> legitimate activities <strong>of</strong> civil society,<br />

and could violate constitutionally protected fundamental rights.<br />

184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!