Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change

THE CASE FOR CHANGE
7.69 We consider that Magistrate Members of the Authority, as well as other
Members with experience of the legal system, would be particularly adept at
scrutinising these cases as they will have experience of case management in the
courts.
7.70 Scrutiny by the MPA should continue on a monthly basis until the matter is
concluded.
7.71 We consider that it would be appropriate for the IPCC to examine evidence
and investigative procedures in those cases at six-monthly intervals. We are
uncertain as to whether the IPCC’s existing powers can be construed as including a
power to monitor in this way. If they cannot, we consider that an express power
should be conferred by regulations.
7.72 Where the officer is suspended, that case should be deemed to be an
Accelerated Procedure Case from the time of suspension. This would mean that
resources (including officer time) will automatically be allocated to the case to
ensure rapid progress in the investigation and to minimise the duration of the
officer’s suspension.
7.73 In cases involving suspension, the internal case management function should
be undertaken outside DPS at Assistant Commissioner level on a monthly basis.
The Assistant Commissioner will adopt a case conference approach, give guidance
on the management of the case and agree the continuation of the officer’s
suspension or alternatively restore him or her to duty.
150