Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE CASE FOR CHANGE<br />
● 16 April 1998<br />
Police Sergeant Virdi suspended from duty in early<br />
hours <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day. A national newspaper publishes an<br />
article relating to <strong>the</strong> arrest, search <strong>of</strong> home and<br />
suspension <strong>of</strong> an Asian <strong>of</strong>ficer. News items also on ITV,<br />
BBC and Asian news.<br />
● 17 April 1998<br />
Police Sergeant Virdi interviewed under caution on<br />
audiotape and denied any connection with <strong>the</strong><br />
sending <strong>of</strong> racist mail.<br />
● 28 June 1998<br />
Police Sergeant Virdi instigates proceedings in <strong>the</strong><br />
Employment Tribunal.<br />
● 30 June 1998<br />
External computer specialist is asked to examine <strong>the</strong><br />
seized computer equipment from Ealing police station.<br />
● 25 August 1999<br />
Solicitors appointed by <strong>the</strong> Police Federation on behalf<br />
<strong>of</strong> Police Sergeant Virdi sought an adjournment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
discipline hearing, as <strong>the</strong>ir computer expert was not<br />
ready.<br />
● 1 September 1999<br />
MPS agreed to <strong>the</strong> adjournment.<br />
● 24 September 1999<br />
New hearing date set <strong>for</strong> 7 February 2000 <strong>for</strong> four<br />
weeks.<br />
● 26 October 1999<br />
Pre-hearing set <strong>for</strong> 15 December 1999 to deal with<br />
any submissions.<br />
● 15 December 1999<br />
Pre-hearing held. Discipline hearing convened.<br />
● 7 July 1998<br />
Search warrant executed at Hanwell and Ealing police<br />
stations searching lockers <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining nine<br />
copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second racist document.<br />
● 7 February 2000<br />
Disciplinary Panel hears legal arguments concerning<br />
<strong>the</strong> admission <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Independent<br />
Advisory Group (IAG) to observe proceedings.<br />
● July 1998 – July 2000<br />
Six Directions Hearings held, mainly awaiting <strong>the</strong><br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> MPS internal processes.<br />
● 6 October 1998<br />
Police Sergeant Virdi interviewed under caution.<br />
● 19 October 1998<br />
File <strong>of</strong> evidence submitted to <strong>the</strong> CPS <strong>for</strong> advice on<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r to charge Police Sergeant Virdi with sending<br />
racist mail.<br />
● 3 March 2000<br />
Discipline hearing concluded. Police Sergeant Virdi is<br />
dismissed from <strong>the</strong> service on 11 charges and<br />
reprimanded on three charges.<br />
● June 2000<br />
<strong>Report</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> IAG into <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Police Sergeant<br />
Virdi.<br />
● 2 June 2000<br />
Police Sergeant Virdi sets out grounds <strong>for</strong> appeal.<br />
● 9 February 1999<br />
<strong>The</strong> CPS advises that no criminal charges should be<br />
brought.<br />
● 22 March 1999<br />
File <strong>of</strong> evidence on Police Sergeant Virdi sent to MPS<br />
solicitors <strong>for</strong> counsel’s advice in respect <strong>of</strong> discipline<br />
charges.<br />
● 29 April 1999<br />
Police Sergeant Virdi in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>of</strong> date <strong>of</strong> hearing and<br />
supplied with a copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charges.<br />
● 30 June 1999<br />
Discipline papers served on Police Sergeant Virdi.<br />
● 7 June 2000<br />
Police Sergeant Virdi lodged a fur<strong>the</strong>r claim with <strong>the</strong><br />
Employment Tribunal relating to his treatment at <strong>the</strong><br />
discipline hearing.<br />
● 3-7 July 2000<br />
Interim decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Employment Tribunal.<br />
● 9 August 2000<br />
Reserved decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Employment Tribunal which<br />
found, on <strong>the</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> probabilities, that <strong>the</strong>re was<br />
no evidence that Police Sergeant Virdi produced <strong>the</strong><br />
racist letters; a fellow white <strong>of</strong>ficer was treated<br />
differently during <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> investigation; <strong>the</strong><br />
explanations put <strong>for</strong>ward by <strong>the</strong> MPS, as representing<br />
good investigation practice, were not sustainable or<br />
justifiable; and <strong>the</strong> reasons <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> failings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MPS<br />
in <strong>the</strong> investigation were not incompetence but that<br />
266