Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BUILDING CAPACITY<br />
9.128 It has been suggested to us that <strong>the</strong> MPS should set up a central resource to<br />
act as a clearing house to find purposeful employment <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers with disabilities<br />
and to “make <strong>the</strong> reasonable adjustments quickly.”<br />
(Evidence <strong>of</strong> Alan Robinson, Disabled Staff Association.)<br />
9.129 Mr Robinson told us that <strong>the</strong>re are delays in getting <strong>of</strong>ficers with disabilities<br />
into suitable jobs. He told us he had three welfare cases, with one <strong>of</strong>ficer having<br />
waited <strong>for</strong> over two years to be redeployed. In ano<strong>the</strong>r case “we were looking <strong>for</strong><br />
personnel who are on restricted duties, because it is – basically, we are taking crimes over <strong>the</strong><br />
Internet and over <strong>the</strong> telephone, ideal <strong>for</strong> someone who needs <strong>of</strong>fice work. So we have said<br />
we want him, his department have said <strong>the</strong>y want rid <strong>of</strong> him, and yet it is taking some five to<br />
six weeks to actually do it, when at <strong>the</strong> stroke <strong>of</strong> a pen, it could be done.”<br />
9.130 <strong>The</strong> MPS has commented that <strong>the</strong> Work<strong>for</strong>ce Planning and Employment<br />
Unit has responsibility <strong>for</strong> posting <strong>of</strong>ficers, taking into account all aspects <strong>of</strong> need,<br />
including welfare. We are told that <strong>the</strong> Unit has recently revised its policy, partly in<br />
response to <strong>the</strong> DDA.<br />
9.131 We see great merit in Mr Robinson’s suggestion <strong>of</strong> a dedicated resource and<br />
we are not clear that <strong>the</strong> Work<strong>for</strong>ce Planning and Employment Unit currently<br />
provides <strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> resource we and Mr Robinson are recommending.<br />
We recommend that <strong>the</strong> MPS sets up a central resource to match <strong>of</strong>ficers and<br />
staff with disabilities to suitable vacancies and to ensure that any necessary<br />
adjustments are made speedily.<br />
9.132 Both this resource and <strong>the</strong> resource <strong>for</strong> matching requests <strong>for</strong> flexible<br />
working to available posts are functions to be absorbed within <strong>the</strong> existing<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HR directorate.<br />
Cross-fertilisation between <strong>the</strong> MPS, <strong>the</strong> private sector and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
public bodies<br />
9.133 We have already commented on <strong>the</strong> strong organisational culture in <strong>the</strong><br />
MPS. This has many benefits, such as a strong sense <strong>of</strong> public service. However, on<br />
occasions we have also sensed that, if an idea or way <strong>of</strong> doing things was ‘not<br />
invented here’, it is not thought worthy <strong>of</strong> consideration.<br />
9.134 For <strong>the</strong> reasons set out earlier, we believe that, if <strong>the</strong> MPS adopts such an<br />
approach, it will lose valuable expertise and, as a result, will not be able to serve<br />
London as effectively as it could.<br />
9.135 One way <strong>of</strong> bringing about changes in <strong>the</strong> policies, procedures and practices<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MPS which would benefit <strong>the</strong> people who work <strong>for</strong> and are served by <strong>the</strong><br />
229