Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS<br />
Welfare support – “Dignity and respect”<br />
7.139 We referred to welfare support earlier when we dealt with <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HR<br />
directorate and we recommended an increased role <strong>for</strong> HR in this area. We have<br />
heard a number <strong>of</strong> witnesses who have told us about a lack <strong>of</strong> welfare support to<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers under investigation:<br />
“So no, no senior <strong>of</strong>ficer – my own inspector from <strong>the</strong> [redacted] came out initially two or<br />
three times, something like that, but gradually, <strong>the</strong>re was no contact at all, and definitely not<br />
from a senior <strong>of</strong>ficer.” (Evidence <strong>of</strong> Mr HH.)<br />
This extended to support to <strong>of</strong>ficers on return to work: “I think <strong>the</strong> Metropolitan Police,<br />
anyway, seem to still have this attitude,‘You are a man, you are in a man’s job, you do not need<br />
looking after, you are whatever age you are, you are adult enough to get on with things’, and<br />
that is clearly wrong, in my opinion.” (Evidence <strong>of</strong> Mr HH.)<br />
We recommend that <strong>the</strong> MPS gives <strong>the</strong> Human Resources directorate<br />
responsibility <strong>for</strong> maintaining contact with <strong>of</strong>ficers under investigation and<br />
overseeing welfare support and re-entry into <strong>the</strong> workplace <strong>for</strong> suspended<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />
Media issues – “<strong>The</strong> MPS chose not to correct <strong>the</strong> press on any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incorrect or<br />
unhelpful stories about me”<br />
7.140 Ano<strong>the</strong>r contentious issue is <strong>the</strong> MPS’ contact with <strong>the</strong> media in disciplinary<br />
cases. A number <strong>of</strong> concerns have been raised with us.<br />
7.141 We recognise and support <strong>the</strong> critical role that <strong>the</strong> press and broadcast<br />
media play in policing. Not only do <strong>the</strong>y provide invaluable assistance in <strong>the</strong><br />
prevention and detection <strong>of</strong> crime but <strong>the</strong>y also have a part to play in holding <strong>the</strong><br />
police service to account and providing citizens with in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />
“Communication has a direct impact on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness and credibility <strong>of</strong> London policing<br />
which cannot succeed without <strong>the</strong> consent and support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community it serves.”<br />
(Submission from Dick Fedorcio, Director <strong>of</strong> Public Affairs, MPS.)<br />
7.142 We recognise that <strong>the</strong>re is a difficult balance to be struck between <strong>the</strong><br />
public’s right to know and <strong>the</strong> impact which releasing in<strong>for</strong>mation may have on an<br />
individual who may <strong>the</strong>n be subject to (sometimes intrusive) media interest and<br />
comment and may well be innocent <strong>of</strong> any charges.<br />
7.143 When investigating its own <strong>of</strong>ficers and staff, <strong>the</strong> MPS has a difficult line to<br />
tread between openness and its duty to act fairly in respect <strong>of</strong> its work<strong>for</strong>ce.<br />
169