Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LESSONS FOR THE FUTURE<br />
occasion. It is <strong>the</strong>se four cases we are using to identify <strong>the</strong> ‘lessons to be learnt’.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y are all cases which have attracted a significant amount <strong>of</strong> interest from <strong>the</strong><br />
media and <strong>the</strong> public.<br />
10.9 Our decision not to deal with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r five cases in detail should not be<br />
taken to mean that we do not think that <strong>the</strong> MPS has anything to learn from <strong>the</strong><br />
way <strong>the</strong>se cases were handled. Quite <strong>the</strong> reverse, we believe that <strong>the</strong>re is merit in<br />
examining all cases once <strong>the</strong>y are concluded and attempting to identify lessons <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> future. We dealt with this specifically when we referred to Employment Tribunal<br />
cases earlier in our report.<br />
10.10 Indeed, <strong>the</strong> details <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individuals involved in all nine<br />
cases and <strong>the</strong> recommendations <strong>the</strong>y made, toge<strong>the</strong>r with those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r 66<br />
individuals who made submissions to us, have proved invaluable in assisting us in<br />
reaching our conclusions and in drafting this report.<br />
10.11 Turning to <strong>the</strong> four cases we deal with in this chapter, we received evidence<br />
in relation to <strong>the</strong> high pr<strong>of</strong>ile cases from <strong>the</strong> individuals involved, staff organisations<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>r commentators.<br />
10.12 We have carefully reviewed all <strong>the</strong> evidence we have received, including <strong>the</strong><br />
submissions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individuals involved, o<strong>the</strong>r documents available to us and <strong>the</strong><br />
reports <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> independent investigators we engaged. We are mindful <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact<br />
that we are necessarily considering <strong>the</strong> cases with <strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> hindsight and have<br />
tempered our conclusions accordingly.<br />
10.13 Our comments on each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four cases begin with a summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facts<br />
surrounding <strong>the</strong> investigation. This is drawn from <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> our independent<br />
investigators and o<strong>the</strong>r evidence. We <strong>the</strong>n outline criticisms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> way each case<br />
was handled. We do not outline all <strong>the</strong> criticisms we have heard but only those we<br />
consider are justified. <strong>Final</strong>ly, we set out <strong>the</strong> lessons which we consider can be<br />
learnt as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> way each case was handled.<br />
235