Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change

PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
7.148 We asked the MPS to comment on some of the issues arising out of the
evidence, in particular the question of information which some officers felt had
been leaked to the press. Mr Fedorcio outlined the MPS’ procedures as follows:
“In each instance the press officer dealing with the case will clear statements or lines to take in
response to media enquiries with the relevant investigating officer or case worker. Each high
profile internal investigation or resulting court case has a bespoke media strategy drafted by
the press officer and presented for the approval of the decision makers involved in the
handling of such matters …
“We do not offer to the media the name or identity of any individuals subject to internal
investigation at the point of arrest or at anytime prior to charge. We treat police officers or
staff who are the subject of a potentially criminal investigation in the same way as we would a
member of the public in the same position.
“The public have a legitimate right to be informed of police activity, and especially incidents
involving police officers who the public have placed in particular positions of trust and
authority. We will always confirm, if asked, by the media that arrests have taken place, and if
any officers have been suspended.The officer would be referred to by their age, place of work,
rank and gender …
“Where we believe unauthorised information has been given to the media the press officer
will bring this to the attention of the investigating officer dealing with a case who will decide
whether the matter should be referred to DPS for further scrutiny or investigation.”
7.149 We have received evidence that suggests that unofficial press releases or
comment is made about individuals. The MPS denies this.
“I think there were unofficial press releases about me; I cannot prove it, but I do feel there
were some about me, and that is what caused the media frenzy. That is why everybody
focused on me, because really, what the media reported was what the Met – was what I felt
the Met had been saying.” (Evidence of MS JJ.)
7.150 Commander Hagon of DPS responded to us on the issue of unauthorised
press comment:
“Unauthorised public comment, that is to say, unauthorised disclosure of confidential
information by a police officer, may amount to a breach of the Police Conduct Regulations.
Similarly, such action by a member of police staff may amount to a breach of Civil Staff
Misconduct and Discipline procedures. Any such action may also constitute a criminal offence
under various statutes, including the Official Secrets Act and the Regulation of Investigatory
Powers Act 2000.
“All ‘leak’ allegations received at the DPS are treated seriously but, like any other allegation,
they are assessed and judged on a case by case basis. Where it is apparent that a disciplinary
offence may have taken place an Investigating Officer will be appointed. It would then be the
171