10.03.2015 Views

Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change

Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change

Final Report of the Morris Inquiry: The Case for Change

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE CASE FOR CHANGE<br />

Lessons to be learnt<br />

10.118 We consider that <strong>the</strong> MPS needs to learn lessons from our analysis in<br />

relation to <strong>the</strong> following areas:<br />

● early resolution <strong>of</strong> disputes;<br />

● confidentiality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discipline process;<br />

● support <strong>for</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficer under investigation;<br />

● <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> Gold Groups;<br />

● <strong>the</strong> way in which investigatory decisions are notified to <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficer concerned;<br />

● Fairness at Work; and<br />

● dealing with difference.<br />

10.119 We hope that <strong>the</strong> recommendations that follow will enable it to do so.<br />

● Except in <strong>the</strong> most serious cases (such as allegations <strong>of</strong> criminal<br />

behaviour) where doing so is clearly inappropriate, we recommend that<br />

<strong>the</strong> MPS should always explore options <strong>for</strong> early in<strong>for</strong>mal resolution.<br />

● We recommend that <strong>the</strong> MPS take steps to ensure that discipline<br />

matters relating to individuals are kept confidential and not discussed<br />

with third parties in a public <strong>for</strong>um.<br />

● We repeat our earlier recommendations in relation to welfare support to<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers under investigation.<br />

● Where Gold Groups are involved, we repeat our earlier recommendation<br />

about <strong>the</strong>ir establishment. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, we recommend that clear guidelines are<br />

established about <strong>the</strong> make-up <strong>of</strong> a Gold Group as, <strong>for</strong> example, it is not<br />

appropriate <strong>for</strong> representatives <strong>of</strong> complainants or o<strong>the</strong>r parties involved<br />

to be members <strong>of</strong> such a Gold Group or to be present at any meetings.<br />

● We recommend that <strong>of</strong>ficers under investigation be provided with a<br />

written record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> such an investigation and a summary<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reasons <strong>for</strong> that outcome.<br />

It is clearly inappropriate <strong>for</strong> Chief Inspector Pendry to remain unclear about<br />

<strong>the</strong> way in which her case has been concluded, and she should be provided<br />

with such a document.<br />

● We have drawn attention to a number <strong>of</strong> questions posed by Chief<br />

Inspector Pendry and we recommend that <strong>the</strong> MPS provides her with<br />

written responses to <strong>the</strong> questions she has posed in her submission.<br />

● Our earlier recommendations in relation to Fairness at Work are also <strong>of</strong><br />

relevance as are our comments on <strong>the</strong> MPS’ ability to manage difference.<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!