15.03.2015 Views

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Questions <strong>and</strong> Answers<br />

Screen<strong>in</strong>g of Annual <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>for</strong> Adaptation <strong>and</strong> Use<br />

To Paul Mapfumo, et al.<br />

Q:If the <strong>in</strong>digenous legumes dom<strong>in</strong>ate natural<br />

fallows, why is maize productivity so low after 1-2<br />

years of natural fallows? .<br />

A: The current weed management approach <strong>in</strong> most<br />

farm<strong>in</strong>g areas is aimed atldeplet<strong>in</strong>g the weed<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g these legumes) seed bank through clean<br />

weed<strong>in</strong>g. There<strong>for</strong>e the current populations are<br />

probably too low to make an impact <strong>in</strong> the short<br />

term.<br />

Q: If these '<strong>in</strong>difallows' are left <strong>for</strong> two or more<br />

years, will they contribute more to productivity?<br />

A: The duration of the fallow does playa big role <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>digenous legume species diversity <strong>and</strong><br />

abundance. In Chikwaka, legume biomass from<br />

one-year fallows was far less than that from twoyear<br />

fallows <strong>for</strong> both species richness <strong>and</strong><br />

abundance.<br />

To Bongani Ncube, et al.<br />

Q: Would it be useful to separate the woody tissue<br />

from leaves <strong>and</strong> their separate response to soil<br />

fertility? Will the woody tissue immobilize N?<br />

A: Our research shows that it is beneficial to<br />

<strong>in</strong>co~porate both leaves <strong>and</strong> stems soon after<br />

harvest<strong>in</strong>g the gra<strong>in</strong>. Stems decompose<br />

substantially with<strong>in</strong> the year of <strong>in</strong>corporation<br />

(based on a five-year ra<strong>in</strong>fall period). There seems<br />

to be better synchrony <strong>for</strong> maize under this system.<br />

Q: Pigeon pea has been researched as long ago as<br />

the early 80's <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe. Did you have an<br />

unsprayed crop <strong>and</strong> was spray<strong>in</strong>g economic?<br />

A: This was a nursery trial aimed at evaluat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

varieties, so we did not put up any control plots.<br />

Our aim was to assess what would grow <strong>in</strong> the<br />

semi-arid region of Matabelel<strong>and</strong>.<br />

C: There is a lot of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation about pigeonpea<br />

adaptability <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe from Matopos, Makaholi,<br />

Panmure <strong>and</strong> Mlezu. See Agronomy Institute<br />

Annual Reports from 1987, 1988 <strong>and</strong> 1989.<br />

A: It is very difficult to get access to this type of<br />

grey literature from the 1980's. None of the current<br />

literature we have reviewed makes reference to this<br />

early work.<br />

Q: Did the research look at "weed suppression" on<br />

the experiments? In Mozambique it was found that<br />

just two weed<strong>in</strong>gs were needed when pigeonpea<br />

was <strong>in</strong>tercropped with maize.<br />

A: Our aim was to keep the crop as clean ·as<br />

possible; so weed<strong>in</strong>g was done every time weed<br />

regeneration occurred.<br />

To Richard Foti, et al.<br />

Q:<br />

1. The 18 kg N ha- 1 <strong>for</strong> maize seems low <strong>for</strong> this<br />

heavy feeder crop. Is this practice not lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

nutrient m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g?<br />

2. Does the evaluation of the returns to a crop<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude the quantification of some of the more<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct crop values such as barter <strong>and</strong> exchange <strong>for</strong><br />

labour?<br />

A:<br />

1. Farmers are already m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soils by not us<strong>in</strong>g any<br />

<strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers at all <strong>and</strong> are there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

<strong>for</strong>ego<strong>in</strong>g extra <strong>in</strong>come that they could generate<br />

from us<strong>in</strong>g low rates of fertilizers, earn more<br />

<strong>in</strong>come, buy more fertilizers <strong>and</strong> move upwards.<br />

Insist<strong>in</strong>g tha t farmers use rates of fertilizer that they<br />

cannot af<strong>for</strong>d <strong>and</strong> that fail to generate a competitive<br />

rate of return on their <strong>in</strong>vestment is retrogressive.<br />

2. Yes the analysis uses the opportunity cost of these<br />

resources <strong>and</strong> products. This will vary <strong>for</strong> <strong>and</strong> are<br />

different <strong>for</strong> different people <strong>and</strong> areas, but we<br />

cannot do the analysis <strong>for</strong> each <strong>and</strong> every farmer.<br />

So we need to compromise <strong>and</strong> do the analysis <strong>for</strong><br />

one set of prices. We then do sensitivity analysis to<br />

alternative prices.<br />

C: In response to the first question, low rates of N<br />

fertilizer is not the problem contribut<strong>in</strong>g to soil<br />

m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. It is lack of <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> soil fertility <strong>in</strong><br />

general by smallholder farmers, be it <strong>in</strong>organics,<br />

legumes or manure. In dry regions, that is the cause<br />

of low productivity <strong>and</strong> low soil fertility. Low rates<br />

of N better suit the <strong>in</strong>vestment profile of semi arid<br />

farmers <strong>and</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e ,r~ "lore likely to be adopted<br />

than the higher "optimal" rates that arestill<br />

recommended.<br />

C: Work from southern Zimbabwe by ICRISAT +<br />

SDARMP have shown that 18 kg N ha- 1 gives the<br />

most economic response. Above 18 kg N ha- 1 often<br />

gives no more yield.<br />

Q : "Results from the @R.isk analysis appear very<br />

close to what farmers <strong>in</strong> semi arid areas are actually<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g anyway, except <strong>for</strong> cattle manure <strong>in</strong> the drier<br />

<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> legumes <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong>. <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!