15.03.2015 Views

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7000<br />

6000<br />

';'<br />

€.. 5000 .~MzSole<br />

::!. 4000 o MlIPP<br />

~<br />

;;: 3000 mMlISunhemp<br />

.~<br />

~ 2000<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

I nte(crop<br />

Rotation<br />

Cropp<strong>in</strong>g s~tem<br />

III MlIMucuna<br />

Figure 1. Maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg hal) from different cropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

systems, across four crop seasons <strong>in</strong> Malawi, 1995/96·1998/99.<br />

Source: Kumwenda et aI., 2001<br />

Mucuna mtercroppmg yielded the least due to competition<br />

<strong>for</strong> growth resources. Rotation trials gave<br />

higher maize yields than the <strong>in</strong>tercroppmg system<br />

due to larger biomass production from the legumes.<br />

However, an economic analysis <strong>in</strong>dicated that cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

maize had higher net benefits than the legume-maize<br />

rotation. Similar studies on ~igeonpea<br />

by Sakala (1998) have <strong>in</strong>dicated that a farmer is better<br />

off opt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> maize/ pigeon <strong>in</strong>tercroppmg than<br />

<strong>for</strong> a pigeonpea-maize rotation or the maize-maize<br />

cropp<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />

Other studies have looked at the time of <strong>in</strong>corporation<br />

of the green manures as a factor that <strong>in</strong>fluences<br />

their potential as soil fertility enhancers. Kumwenda<br />

et al. (2001) carried out experiments where<br />

biomass was mcorporated at either the time of<br />

maximum flower<strong>in</strong>g, at pod <strong>in</strong>itiation (early <strong>in</strong>corporation)<br />

or at harvest (late <strong>in</strong>corporation). Three<br />

species, M. pruriens, C. juncea <strong>and</strong> T. vogelii were<br />

used, along with maize. Higher maize gram yields<br />

were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from early-<strong>in</strong>corporated residues<br />

than with late. mcorpora.tion (Table 3) . This was attributed<br />

to high CN ratios <strong>and</strong> high lign<strong>in</strong> contents<br />

<strong>in</strong> the late <strong>in</strong>corporated residues. However, work<br />

by Sakala et al. (2001) revealed that with late <strong>in</strong>corporation,<br />

lower yields are obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the first year<br />

Table 3. Maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield (kg hal) as <strong>in</strong>fluenced by legume<br />

crop residues <strong>and</strong> time of <strong>in</strong>corporation at five sites <strong>in</strong><br />

Malawi, 1996/97 cro season<br />

legume crop/Maize<br />

Time of <strong>in</strong>corporation Mean yield (kg ha")<br />

M. pruriens Early 3392<br />

late 2223<br />

C. juncea Early 3218<br />

late 2692<br />

I T. vogelii Early 2845<br />

late 1483<br />

I Maize·maize 397<br />

Source: Kumwenda et ai., 2001<br />

only but m the subsequent years farmers realize<br />

higher yields, which was attributed to the build-up<br />

of nutrients. It was there<strong>for</strong>e recommended that<br />

farmers who are constra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>for</strong> labour would still<br />

chose late <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>and</strong> realize a longer stream<br />

of higher maize yields.<br />

A three-year study was carried out m Southern Malawi<br />

by Kamanga et al. (1999) to examme the feasibility<br />

of <strong>in</strong>ter-plantmg nitrogen fixmg perennial legumes<br />

<strong>in</strong>to maize fields as a way to periodically add<br />

green manures to maize. The treatments were Sesbania<br />

sesban, Tephrosia vogelii, Pigeonpea (Cajanus<br />

ca;an) <strong>and</strong> maize. The legumes were relay mtercropped<br />

with maize at first w eedmg. It was shown<br />

that the application of 48 kg N ha- 1 comb<strong>in</strong>ed with<br />

residue <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>in</strong>creased maize yields by 62­<br />

71 %. Higher maize yields were obtamed from the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ter-plant<strong>in</strong>g of S. sesban (2.9 t ha- 1 ) <strong>and</strong> T. vogelii<br />

(2.6 t ha- 1 ) than from pigeonpea (2 .1 t ha- 1 ) <strong>and</strong><br />

maize stover (2.0 t ha- I ).<br />

Crop Rotation<br />

Crop rotation refers to the repetitive cultivation of<br />

an ordered succession of crops on the same l<strong>and</strong><br />

(Mloza-B<strong>and</strong>a, 1994). The aim is to ma<strong>in</strong>tam <strong>and</strong><br />

improve soil fertility, <strong>in</strong>cludmg both its physical<br />

<strong>and</strong> chemical characteristics. It also ensures that the<br />

carryover of pests <strong>and</strong> diseases from one season to<br />

another is m<strong>in</strong>imized.<br />

The benefits from crop rotations <strong>in</strong>volvmg gra<strong>in</strong><br />

legumes (groundnut, bambara nut <strong>and</strong> soya bean)<br />

over a cont<strong>in</strong>uous maize-maize cropp<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

have been reported <strong>in</strong> several studies <strong>in</strong> Malawi<br />

(Brown, 1958; Lungu, 1973 <strong>and</strong> MacColl, 1989;<br />

Kumwenda, 1996; <strong>and</strong> Mhango, 2002). This has<br />

been attributed to improved soil fertility through<br />

biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) <strong>and</strong> crop residue<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporation. However, gra<strong>in</strong> legume-maize rotations<br />

are not efficient because of the <strong>in</strong>adequate biomass<br />

they prod uce <strong>and</strong> the small amounts of N reta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> crop residues to meet the N requirements<br />

of the subsequent maize crop. Giller Jnd Wilson<br />

(199\) po<strong>in</strong>ted out that most of the N fixed by gra<strong>in</strong><br />

legumes is exported away from the field due to high<br />

nitrogen gra<strong>in</strong> harvest· <strong>in</strong>dices. Other studies have<br />

looked <strong>in</strong>to the <strong>in</strong>clusion of pastures <strong>in</strong> crop rotations<br />

to enhance maize prod uction. Maceoll ( 1990)<br />

reported on long term trials whose aim was to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the contribution to maize yield from a previous<br />

pasture legume crop. The treatments were<br />

two rates of N (0 <strong>and</strong> 80 kg N ha- I ) from CAN fertilizer;<br />

maize, pure silver leaf, pure stylo, silver leaf/<br />

rhodes grass, <strong>and</strong> stylo/rhodes grass. Pastures<br />

were grown from 1981 to 1984, <strong>and</strong> then the plots<br />

<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> legumes <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!