Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4500<br />
4000 .<br />
3500<br />
to<br />
'" 3000 - , "-··1992<br />
. • . 1993<br />
0><br />
0<<br />
-0 2 500 - .... - . 1994<br />
1\j --1995<br />
2000<br />
--_·01(·····_·1996<br />
>=<br />
c<br />
'm<br />
i!l<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
N rate kg/h.<br />
- - 1997<br />
···--+- 1996<br />
Figure 1. Maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield responses on a low fertility soil to<br />
vary<strong>in</strong>g amounts of applied N(kg/hal simulated us<strong>in</strong>g tong-term<br />
weather data from Masv<strong>in</strong>go<br />
Agronomic nitrogen use efficiencies (NUEs) were<br />
calculated from the simulated maize yields as extra<br />
kg gra<strong>in</strong> produced divided by extra kg of N applied.<br />
Averaged over all years, agronomic NUEs<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>ed from around 45-56 kg gra<strong>in</strong> per kg of applied<br />
N at low application rates to about 33-38 at<br />
high N rates. In Figure 2, the agronomic NUE <strong>for</strong> a<br />
crop receiv<strong>in</strong>g 10 kg N/ha is plotted aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />
yield <strong>for</strong> an unfertilised maize crop. The data suggests<br />
that responses to low rates of N (commonly<br />
used by smallholder farmers) are generally larger<br />
on low than with high fertility soils.<br />
Simulations were also conducted <strong>for</strong> the same climatic<br />
record <strong>for</strong> maize yields follow<strong>in</strong>g a mucuna<br />
crop on a moderate fertility s<strong>and</strong>y soil. The mucuna<br />
was managed <strong>in</strong> two ways: - either harvested at maturity<br />
(1 July) <strong>and</strong> then <strong>in</strong>corporated just be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
maize plant<strong>in</strong>g (Management 1), or harvested <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>corporated at flower<strong>in</strong>g (Management 2). For<br />
each management system, two cycles of simulations<br />
were done, one <strong>in</strong> which a s<strong>in</strong>gle crop of maize was<br />
grown follow<strong>in</strong>g mucuna <strong>and</strong> the other <strong>in</strong> which<br />
two maize crops were grown <strong>in</strong> succession after a<br />
mucuna crop.<br />
Despite hav<strong>in</strong>g fewer seasons <strong>in</strong> which maize is<br />
grown <strong>in</strong> the mucuna-maize <strong>and</strong> mucuna-maizemaize<br />
rotations when compared to cont<strong>in</strong>uous sole<br />
maize, maize gra<strong>in</strong> yields averaged over the 47-year<br />
record are predicted to be 3-5 times higher <strong>in</strong> rotations<br />
that <strong>in</strong>clude mucuna (Figure 3). With cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
sole maize cropp<strong>in</strong>g, just over 20 tonnes of<br />
maize gra<strong>in</strong> is realised over 47 years compared to<br />
totals of between 80 <strong>and</strong> 120 tonnes <strong>in</strong> rotations that<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude mucuna (Figure 4).<br />
At a 50% probability level, unfertilised maize gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yields are 3.5-4.0 t/ha <strong>for</strong> the mucuna-maize rotations<br />
<strong>and</strong> 3.5-4.5 t/ha <strong>for</strong> the mucuna-maize-maize<br />
rotations (Figure 5). These yields are far greater<br />
than the 200-300 kg/ha obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>for</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous sole<br />
maize cropp<strong>in</strong>g at the same probability level.<br />
<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa<br />
. .<br />
~ ..e ".<br />
. .' / . '.<br />
YIeld response 10 10 kg Nnw<br />
Figure 2. Simulated maize yield response to a 10 kg N/ha <br />
application <strong>for</strong> a crop grown on soils of different fertility status <br />
300• . 0,-______________---,<br />
025 00.0+_-------------~~<br />
i 2(100 .0<br />
.<br />
>. I ~OO.O+_------~~<br />
.,<br />
•<br />
i 1 00 0 0 +_------~<br />
Figure 3. Mean maize gra<strong>in</strong> yields <strong>for</strong> the 47·year record <strong>for</strong><br />
different cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems<br />
OCOOOr-----------------------------------~<br />
~~------------------~----------~~.~<br />
70000+_----------------~----~~~=---~<br />
~~+-------------------~~~----~~--~<br />
.~<br />
~50000~--------------~~_,~~--------~<br />
jf~+_-----------~L-~~-------------~<br />
i~r-------~#7~------------------~<br />
u~+_---~~-------~--~~----------~<br />
l0000+_~~~~~------------------------_i<br />
SoIematze 'MxlJna-rreize1 - Mucuna-maize2<br />
- 'Muruna-maize-rT'9ize1 .... 'Muruna-rrnlze-malZ.e2<br />
Figure 4. Cumulative maize gra<strong>in</strong> production over 47 years <strong>for</strong> the<br />
different production systems<br />
The loss <strong>in</strong> maize production from the piece of l<strong>and</strong><br />
where mucuna is grown <strong>in</strong> the first season, coupled<br />
with labour constra<strong>in</strong>ts, has been given by many<br />
workers as one of the limitations <strong>in</strong> the uptake of<br />
green manure technologies by farmers (Kumwenda,<br />
Wadd<strong>in</strong>gton, Snapp, Jones <strong>and</strong> Blackie, 1997).<br />
However, <strong>in</strong> Northern Malawi on fairly good s<strong>and</strong>y<br />
soils, a one season sole crop green manure can <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
maize yields from 200-300 kg/ha to up to 4<br />
000 kg/ha. The data presented here also suggests at<br />
the 50% probability level, a yield surplus from an<br />
,~ .<br />
89