15.03.2015 Views

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 1. Reduction of soil acidi.ty after lim<strong>in</strong>g at experimental sites.<br />

Acidity (cmol kgl) lime added<br />

Site A1 3 • + H" A1 3 • kg hal Initial After lim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1. Chibwe 0.20 0.10 360 5.1 5.3<br />

2. GART 1.00 0.66 1500 4.1 5.2<br />

3. Magoye COT 0.30 0.24 510 4.1 4.5<br />

4. Mwanach<strong>in</strong>gwala 0.34 0.28 450 4.4 5.1<br />

5. lusitu 0.12 0.10 450 4.3 5.4<br />

als were extended to three other sites - one site <strong>in</strong><br />

Eastern Prov<strong>in</strong>ce (Region II) <strong>and</strong> two <strong>in</strong> Northern<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce (Region III).<br />

Phosphorus was applied as mono-ammonium phosphate<br />

(MAP) as the reference fertilizer <strong>and</strong> as partially<br />

acidulated phosphate rock (PAPR) produced<br />

at the Pilot Plant of the School of M<strong>in</strong>es at the University<br />

of Zambia from Chilembwe phosphaterbck.<br />

The trials were designed as On-Farm, or On-Station<br />

<strong>in</strong> which the plots were 100 m2 <strong>and</strong> 22.5 m2 respectively.<br />

The P application rates were 0, 60 <strong>and</strong> 120 kg<br />

P20S ha· J <strong>in</strong> On-Farm trials <strong>and</strong> 0, 40, 80, 120, 160<br />

<strong>and</strong> 200 kg P20 S ha- 1 <strong>in</strong> On-Station trials. All treatments<br />

were replicated fouT times <strong>in</strong> a r<strong>and</strong>omized<br />

complete block design. The fertilizer was b<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

the plant<strong>in</strong>g furrow below the seed at plant<strong>in</strong>g. All<br />

treatments received adequate amounts of K, S as<br />

recommended <strong>for</strong> the particular sites (70 kg <strong>and</strong><br />

26.4 kg ha- 1 respectively). Nitrogen was applied as a<br />

basal application at 24 kg N ha- 1 at On-Farm sites<br />

<strong>and</strong> 44 kg N ha- 1 at On-Stati0n sites. The test crops<br />

were maize; sorghum, sunflower <strong>and</strong> legumes<br />

(soybean, groundnut <strong>and</strong> cowpea). A peat-based<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculum was applied to soybean at plant<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the recommended rate.<br />

The test crops were grown <strong>for</strong> . two seasons, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

all cases improved varieties of test gra<strong>in</strong> legumes<br />

were planted accord<strong>in</strong>g to the suitability <strong>and</strong> importance<br />

of the legume <strong>in</strong> the locality of the trial. In Onstation<br />

trials <strong>in</strong> Region II, soybean variety Kaleya<br />

<strong>and</strong> groundnut variety MGV4 were planted. These<br />

varieties are well adapted to Region II <strong>and</strong> are very<br />

responsive to <strong>in</strong>oculation with Rhizobium. The<br />

MGV 4 groundnut variety is tolerant to soil acidity<br />

<strong>and</strong> has low pod failure (Pops) <strong>in</strong> these soils. Soybean<br />

was grQwn at Kafuku Farm Institute <strong>and</strong><br />

UNZA Farm, groundnut at Magoye CDT. Cowpea<br />

variety Bubebe was grown at Lusitu <strong>in</strong> Region 1.<br />

The variety was grown because of its earl<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong><br />

high yields, the <strong>for</strong>mer attribute be<strong>in</strong>g particularly<br />

important <strong>in</strong> this drought prone Region.<br />

Soybean was drilled at an <strong>in</strong>ter row spac<strong>in</strong>g of 75<br />

cm. Groundnut was grown at an <strong>in</strong>ter- <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>trarow<br />

spac<strong>in</strong>g of 75 cm <strong>and</strong> 10 cm respectively. The<br />

spac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> cowpea was 75 cm between rows <strong>and</strong> 10<br />

em between plants.<br />

pH<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the second cropp<strong>in</strong>g season (2001/2002), ~he<br />

plant<strong>in</strong>g furrows from the first season were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

However, the crops were rotated around the<br />

plots at each sit~ . No further applications of P were<br />

made to the higher rates of P application (120, 160<br />

<strong>and</strong> 200 kg P20S ha- I ), <strong>and</strong> the residual effects were<br />

evaluated from these treatments. Other nutrients, N,<br />

P, K <strong>and</strong> S <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the application of <strong>in</strong>oculum<br />

were repeated as <strong>in</strong> the first season accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

current fertilization practice. An absolute control<br />

treatment <strong>in</strong> which no fertilizer was applied was<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>for</strong> sites where space permitteQ. adjacent to<br />

the current trial.<br />

The treatments were split, <strong>and</strong> a lime treatment was<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded to evaluate its effect on crop growth, especially<br />

on the acid soils at Chibwe, GART, Magoye<br />

(both on-station <strong>and</strong> on-farm) <strong>and</strong> Lusitu sites. Each<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al treatment plot was split <strong>in</strong>to two equal subplots,<br />

<strong>and</strong> one half was limed while the other was<br />

not limed. The amount of lime applied was calculated<br />

based on the exchangeable alum<strong>in</strong>ium values<br />

(Table 1).<br />

The lime was broadcast on the surface <strong>and</strong> then<br />

worked <strong>in</strong>to the soil by light cultivation us<strong>in</strong>g h<strong>and</strong><br />

hoes be<strong>for</strong>e plant<strong>in</strong>g. Crop growth was monitored<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the season, <strong>and</strong> some plant growth parameters<br />

were recorded. Crop management both <strong>in</strong> the<br />

first <strong>and</strong> second cropp<strong>in</strong>g seasons was carried out<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to the conventional agronomic practices<br />

<strong>for</strong> these crops.<br />

Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion<br />

Although various test crops were evaluated, only<br />

the results <strong>for</strong> the grct<strong>in</strong> legumes are presented <strong>and</strong><br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> this paper. These results are discussed<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to crop across trial sites.<br />

Soybean<br />

At Kafuku Farm Institute (sited on Mushemi soil<br />

series), a response to soybean biomass <strong>and</strong> gra<strong>in</strong><br />

yield was obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the second cropp<strong>in</strong>g season<br />

only with the application of PAPR at 40 kg P20S<br />

ha- 1 . There was a tendency <strong>for</strong> the residual effect of<br />

both MAP <strong>and</strong> PAPR to decrease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g P<br />

level, reach<strong>in</strong>g a m<strong>in</strong>imum when P was applied at<br />

160 kg P20S ha- 1 <strong>and</strong> subsequently <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g at the<br />

highest rate of P application. This is illustrated <strong>in</strong><br />

Figure 2, show<strong>in</strong>g the effect of source <strong>and</strong> level of P<br />

on soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield.<br />

The soils at Chibwe On-Farm sit-e · were similar to<br />

those at Kafuku Farm Institute except that the soils<br />

were higher <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial soil P. Consequently <strong>in</strong> the<br />

first cropp<strong>in</strong>g season (2001/02), there was no yield<br />

<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!