Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
few studies characterized the household assets<br />
of the host farmers. Consequently it is difficult<br />
to assess the reasons why some farmers may<br />
favour one technology <strong>and</strong> others another.<br />
• Few papers presented actually showed clear<br />
hypotheses <strong>for</strong> the experiments.<br />
• It is evident from the papers presented that host<br />
farmers are beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to develop their own local<br />
taxonomies. These need to be catalogued to<br />
enable wider dissem<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />
Suggestions aris<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
• There is a need to collate <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation from different<br />
trials <strong>in</strong> the region <strong>in</strong>to GIS databases to<br />
look at soil, climate <strong>and</strong> social <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />
• Ex ante market studies on legumes are required.<br />
This will meet a grow<strong>in</strong>g need to assess market<br />
dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>for</strong> legumes be<strong>for</strong>e they are promoted<br />
<strong>in</strong> an area.<br />
• Need a synthesis study on results ~e have to<br />
date concern<strong>in</strong>g the relative merits <strong>and</strong> benefits<br />
of <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> rotations.<br />
• Comb<strong>in</strong>ations of <strong>in</strong>organics <strong>and</strong> organics need<br />
further attention. More <strong>and</strong> detailed studies are<br />
required on the synergistic effects of organiC<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>organic fertility amendments. At the<br />
same time, work is required to develop simple<br />
<strong>and</strong> transferable messages.<br />
• Detailed economic analyses of many of the <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />
br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to question their appropriateness<br />
<strong>for</strong> smallholder farm<strong>in</strong>g systems. If research<br />
<strong>in</strong>tends that the smallholder farmer is to<br />
benefit from their work, it is essential that research<br />
take on a greater participatory emphasis<br />
<strong>in</strong> problem identification, development <strong>and</strong><br />
evaluation of <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />
legume residues <strong>and</strong> concluded t fertilizer N<br />
applications were necessary <strong>for</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ed production<br />
(based on one abnormal year).<br />
2. N availability/dynamics <strong>in</strong> soil:<br />
• M<strong>in</strong>eral-N <strong>in</strong> soil does not correlate well with N<br />
recovery by maize from preced<strong>in</strong>g legumes nor<br />
with maize yield response.<br />
• M<strong>in</strong>eral-N dynamics suggest that m<strong>in</strong>eralized<br />
N is flushed through the soil profile be<strong>for</strong>e<br />
maize roots are present to extract it, lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
poor synchrony of N availability <strong>and</strong> N uptake<br />
by maize.<br />
3. N recovery from legumes (<strong>and</strong> fertilizer) by<br />
subsequent maize crops:<br />
• Measured us<strong>in</strong>g 15N techniques by Chikowo et<br />
al.<br />
• Net N <strong>in</strong>puts from legumes were < 10 kg/ha <strong>for</strong><br />
soybean, pigeonpea <strong>and</strong> erotolaria but> 80 kg/<br />
ha <strong>for</strong> mucuna.<br />
• N recovery was always < 36%; be<strong>in</strong>g least <strong>for</strong><br />
mucuna (12%) <strong>and</strong> greater <strong>for</strong> legumes with<br />
small N <strong>in</strong>puts. Their high percent recovery<br />
possibly be<strong>in</strong>g due to their low total N <strong>in</strong>put.<br />
• N recovery from fertilizer was 2x N recovery<br />
. from mucuna, which had similar <strong>in</strong>puts (95 <strong>and</strong><br />
84 kg-N fha, respectively).<br />
Issues from the questions <strong>and</strong> discussion:<br />
• Economics of green manures: What marg<strong>in</strong>al<br />
<strong>in</strong>crement/ yield ga<strong>in</strong> is necessary <strong>for</strong> farmers<br />
to take up the technology?<br />
• The multiple uses of green manures need 'to be<br />
considered <strong>in</strong> maize/green manure-gra<strong>in</strong> legume<br />
systems; e.g., animals that graze residues.<br />
Legume Benefits on Maize Productivity<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> Properties<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> issues from the three presentations <strong>in</strong> this<br />
session were:<br />
1. Maize response to legumes <strong>in</strong> rotations <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tercrops.<br />
2. N availability / dyna.mics <strong>in</strong> soil as affected by<br />
green manures <strong>and</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> legumes <strong>in</strong> rotations<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercrops.<br />
3. N recovery from legumes (<strong>and</strong> fertilizer) by<br />
subsequent maize crops.<br />
1. Maize response to legumes <strong>in</strong> rotations <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tercrops:<br />
• In two studies, legumes gave very large maize<br />
yield <strong>in</strong>creases; by 2-3x the yields without fertilizer.<br />
• BUT one study found only weak responses to<br />
Improv<strong>in</strong>g the Productivity of <strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Legumes</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong><br />
Highlight po<strong>in</strong>ts from the papers:<br />
1. Agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock<br />
products, mono-ammonium phosphate <strong>and</strong><br />
lime on gra<strong>in</strong> legume productivity <strong>in</strong> some<br />
Zambian soils (abed I. Lungu <strong>and</strong> Kalaluka<br />
Muny<strong>in</strong>da)<br />
• Partially acidulated phosphate rock (PAPR)<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed a high level of soil P than mono ammonium<br />
phosphate (MAP)<br />
• Lime <strong>in</strong>creased P effectiveness <strong>and</strong> legume biomass<br />
productivity<br />
• Optimal P application rate <strong>for</strong> legumes was 80<br />
kg P20S per ha<br />
• Simply processed PAPR (acidulated with sulphuric<br />
acid) was agronomically as effective as<br />
242<br />
<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa