- Page 2 and 3:
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for
- Page 4 and 5:
Acknowledgments • The Leopard Roc
- Page 6 and 7:
Evall!ating mucuna green manure tec
- Page 9:
INTRODUCTION AND CONFERENCE OBJECTI
- Page 12 and 13:
Table 1. Paradigm shifts underlying
- Page 14 and 15:
100 90 80 - - 0 - - Uptake by ihe m
- Page 16 and 17:
- 6 ~ 9 8 7 0- 5 CḎ ns 4 0::: 3
- Page 18 and 19:
Table 3. Millet grain and total dry
- Page 20 and 21:
Dvorak KA 1996. Adoption potential
- Page 23 and 24:
LEGUMES FOR SOIL FERTILITY IN SOUTH
- Page 25 and 26:
to the system in such a way that th
- Page 27:
Muetzelfeldt, R.1. 1995. A framewor
- Page 30 and 31:
ing capacity. Legumes offer other b
- Page 32 and 33:
people/km2), land holdings are smal
- Page 34 and 35:
ments. It would help researchers to
- Page 36 and 37:
Own livestock Gununo farmers for th
- Page 39:
Questions and Answers ~ey Papers To
- Page 42 and 43:
Historical Perspective on Soyabean
- Page 44 and 45:
ganic amendment for resource-poor f
- Page 46 and 47:
MPhil. Thesis. University of Zimbab
- Page 48 and 49:
deal of research work has been bias
- Page 50 and 51:
1600 '7 ns 1400 ~ 1200 Cl ~ 1000 "C
- Page 52 and 53:
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)
- Page 54 and 55:
Boswell EP, Koide RT, Shumway DL, A
- Page 56 and 57:
Materials and Methods The trial was
- Page 58 and 59:
0.9 0.8 ~ 0.7 Rec '-' 0.6 Vl ::9 0.
- Page 60 and 61:
Series no 5. Soil Science SOciety o
- Page 62 and 63:
Materials and Methods Persistence o
- Page 64 and 65:
content resulted in increased rhizo
- Page 66 and 67:
(Mugwiia and Murwira, 1997). Howeve
- Page 68 and 69:
Table 2. Average maize yield estima
- Page 70 and 71:
implied that most fanners prefer to
- Page 73 and 74:
] Questions and Answers Rhizobium,
- Page 75 and 76:
ADDING A NEW DIMENSION TO THE IMPRO
- Page 77 and 78:
Materials and Methods The study use
- Page 79 and 80:
a) Chikwaka b) Chinyika !21 C. absu
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 3. N, P and Kconcentrations (
- Page 83 and 84:
Abstract SCREENING OF SHORT DURATIO
- Page 85 and 86:
Table 2. Characteristics of short d
- Page 87 and 88:
RISK DIVERSIFICATION OPPORTUNITIES
- Page 89 and 90:
management technologies with differ
- Page 91 and 92:
Table 3. Expected annual returns (Z
- Page 93:
Table 6. Risk diversification indic
- Page 96 and 97:
een renewed interest in green manur
- Page 98 and 99:
unfertilised maize crop of over 200
- Page 101 and 102:
Questions and Answers Screening of
- Page 103 and 104:
GREEN MANURE AND FOOD LEGUMES RESEA
- Page 105 and 106:
7000 6000 ';' €.. 5000 .~MzSole :
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 5. Maize grain yield (kg ha")
- Page 109:
Phiri, A.D.K. 1999. Effects of Sesb
- Page 112 and 113:
amount of roots with sl:nnhemp. It
- Page 114 and 115:
It was proved that a mixed farming
- Page 116 and 117:
Table 3. Above·ground biomass (t/h
- Page 118 and 119:
and horticulture in Zimbabwe: Case
- Page 121 and 122:
GRAIN LEGUMES AND GREEN MANURES IN
- Page 123 and 124:
Results Table 1. Adaptation of gree
- Page 125 and 126:
Four rates of fertilizer N were app
- Page 127 and 128:
THE ROLE OF COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULA
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 1. Non-legume cropping patter
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 9. Common pests on cowpeas as
- Page 133 and 134:
few of the farmers interviewed acqu
- Page 135:
Murwira, H.K., M.J. Swift and P.G.H
- Page 138 and 139:
Materials and Methods On farm exper
- Page 140 and 141:
18000 1600) 14000 a) Zambia 12000 m
- Page 143 and 144:
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT GREEN MANURE LE
- Page 145 and 146:
.. ~ Table 2. The effect of time o
- Page 147:
Chivinge, O.A., E. Kasembe, and I.K
- Page 150 and 151:
times with regionally specific adap
- Page 152 and 153:
ter content at 180 cm was still wel
- Page 154 and 155:
to amount of biomass, quality of bi
- Page 156 and 157:
with the natural fallow, which did
- Page 158 and 159:
and K to maize as an equivalent amo
- Page 160 and 161:
forts to understand the mechanisms
- Page 162 and 163:
gen recovery rates in relation to p
- Page 164 and 165:
The first steps to improve soil fer
- Page 167 and 168:
Questions and Answers .Identificat
- Page 169 and 170:
MUCUNA - MAIZE ROTATIONS AND SHORT
- Page 171:
Table 3. Percent nitrogen (% N) con
- Page 174 and 175:
~e decomposition of legume residues
- Page 176 and 177:
Table 3. Effect of forage legumes o
- Page 178 and 179: available nutrients and vice versa,
- Page 180 and 181: Conclusion and Recommendation Mucun
- Page 182 and 183: Specific objectives were to: • Te
- Page 184 and 185: '"~ v '" ~ ~ 1400000 1200000 100000
- Page 187 and 188: EFFECT OF SURFACE APPLICATION AND I
- Page 189: it 4 a···· · ... - :.!! e.....
- Page 193 and 194: PERFORMANCE OF GREEN MANURES AND GR
- Page 195: Mungwi soil, cowpea and soyabean pr
- Page 198 and 199: Among BNF systems, symbiotic system
- Page 200 and 201: 3500 .f"'3000 ca ,c2500 CI "" - 200
- Page 202 and 203: above-ground biomass was not transl
- Page 204 and 205: 3000 "0 ]i >. ,5 ~ C> 800 600 400 2
- Page 206 and 207: Most interventions involving green
- Page 208 and 209: ~ ~~----.-~r-~-------------r~~ Aoo
- Page 210 and 211: stover N, followed by after pigeon
- Page 212 and 213: tems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. Procee
- Page 214 and 215: 1965). The tailings and AgLi were a
- Page 216 and 217: The significant soybean yield could
- Page 218 and 219: twice the yield is necessary. We ha
- Page 220 and 221: Table 1. Maize and Grain Legumes Pr
- Page 222 and 223: Recommendations and Conclusion In v
- Page 224 and 225: performance of private sector compa
- Page 226 and 227: the investment costs incurred. The
- Page 231 and 232: A SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LEGUME
- Page 233 and 234: Table 1. Gross margins from the dif
- Page 235 and 236: Abstract LINKING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOP
- Page 237 and 238: 3. If households are linked to prod
- Page 239 and 240: Table 9. Average Table 8. Pigeonpea
- Page 241 and 242: ance of sorghum-pigeonpea intercrop
- Page 243: Mligo, J.K., 1995. Pigeonpea breedi
- Page 246 and 247: To Charles Nhemachena, et al. Q: 1)
- Page 248 and 249: • Assessment of the potential ben
- Page 250 and 251: few studies characterized the house
- Page 252 and 253: • Conduct more research to measur
- Page 254: Socio-Economics, Policy and Technol