Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
times with regionally specific adaptations. However,<br />
the amount of fertilizer used <strong>in</strong> southern Africa<br />
is very small <strong>in</strong> comparison to other parts of the<br />
world, with the highest rates found <strong>in</strong> a country like<br />
Zimbabwe <strong>in</strong> the commercial sector. For most<br />
smallholders, fertilizer use is as low as 5 kg/hal<br />
year (Gerner <strong>and</strong> Harris, 1993). While the need <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creased use of <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers <strong>in</strong> southern Africa<br />
is clear, there are problems with an approach<br />
based exclusively on <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers where water<br />
supply is limited <strong>and</strong> variable. In many areas<br />
outside the higher ra<strong>in</strong>fall zones or away from irrigated<br />
areas, any sensible farmer will use expensive<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilizer with caution <strong>and</strong> supplement with<br />
organic sources. In most areas, fertilizer is there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
used ma<strong>in</strong>ly on home fields, gardens or high value<br />
crops such as cotton <strong>and</strong> vegetables.<br />
While the need <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased fertilizer use <strong>in</strong> Southern<br />
Africa is apparent to all, the challenge of achiev<strong>in</strong>g<br />
this is very great. A high external <strong>in</strong>put strategy<br />
cannot rely on fertilizer-seeds-credit packages, without<br />
address<strong>in</strong>g other requirements <strong>for</strong> successful<br />
uptake of green revolution technologies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
water management, credit systems, <strong>in</strong>frastructure,<br />
fertilizer manufacture <strong>and</strong> supply <strong>and</strong> access to<br />
markets. Most African conditions are unlike the<br />
pla<strong>in</strong>s of Asia so that the approaches which produced<br />
such successes there are not easily transferable<br />
to the African cont<strong>in</strong>ent. Given the acute poverty<br />
<strong>and</strong> limited access to m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilizers an ecologically<br />
robust approach of improved fallows is discussed<br />
<strong>in</strong> this synthesis. This approach is a prodllct<br />
of many years of agro<strong>for</strong>estry research <strong>and</strong> development<br />
by ICRAF <strong>and</strong> its partners <strong>in</strong> southern Africa.<br />
Improved Fallows<br />
Improved fallows <strong>and</strong> their topology<br />
Improved fallows are the deliberate plant<strong>in</strong>g of fastgrow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
species, usually wood tree legumes, <strong>for</strong><br />
rapid replenishment of soil fertility. Fallows are as<br />
old as agriculture <strong>in</strong> southern Africa. Grass fallows<br />
are a common feature of the farm<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong> the<br />
sub humid <strong>and</strong> semiarid zones of the region. Improve<br />
fallows were not a major area of research dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the green revolution due to the focus to elim<strong>in</strong>ate<br />
soil constra<strong>in</strong>ts by use of m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilizers.<br />
With the development of the second soil fertility<br />
paradigm based on susta<strong>in</strong>ability considerations<br />
(Sanchez, 1994), the biological dimensions of soil<br />
fertility began to receive <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g attention <strong>and</strong><br />
research on improved fallows has <strong>in</strong>creased s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
the mid 1980s. Reported work <strong>in</strong>cludes Kwesiga<br />
<strong>and</strong> Coe (1994), Drechsel et al. (1996), Rao et al.<br />
(1998) <strong>and</strong> Snapp et al. (1998).<br />
Large-scale adoption of short-term improved fallows<br />
by farmers is now tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> southern Africa<br />
<strong>and</strong> east Africa. The ma<strong>in</strong> species used are legumes<br />
of the genus Sesbania, Tephrosia, Leucaena,<br />
Gliricidia, Crotalaria <strong>and</strong> Cajanus.<br />
Non-coppic<strong>in</strong>g fallows<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the sem<strong>in</strong>al work of Kwesiga <strong>and</strong> Coe (1994)<br />
on Sesbania fallows, a lot has been learnt about the<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance of improved fallows. There has been<br />
extensive test<strong>in</strong>g ·of fallows on farm to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the maize productivity <strong>and</strong> processes that <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />
fallow per<strong>for</strong>mance. The per<strong>for</strong>mance of Sesbania<br />
<strong>and</strong> Tephrosia <strong>in</strong> a wide range of biophysical conditions<br />
is shown on Table 1. Improved fallows of twoyear<br />
duration with both species significantly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
maize yields well above unfertilized maize<br />
(which is a cpmmon farmer's practice). Fertilized<br />
maize per<strong>for</strong>med better than improved fallows <strong>in</strong><br />
most cases. It is very clear from these results that<br />
the residual effects of fallows on maize yield decl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
after the second year of cropp<strong>in</strong>g. In a third<br />
year of cropp<strong>in</strong>g, maize yields were similar to unfertilized<br />
maize. Farmers have asked researchers<br />
how can they extend the residual effects of fallows<br />
beyond two years of cropp<strong>in</strong>g. Suggestions have<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded apply<strong>in</strong>g low rates of <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer <strong>in</strong><br />
the second or third year of cropp<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease residual<br />
effects. Alternatively, farmers can use species<br />
of trees which coppice after cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> use<br />
coppice regrowth to <strong>in</strong>crease residual effects.<br />
Coppic<strong>in</strong>g fallows <br />
Most of the work on improved fallows has concen<br />
trated on Sesbania sesban, but this species has draw<br />
backs. When cut at fallow term<strong>in</strong>ation, which is 2<br />
years of growth, it will not resprout or coppice. <br />
Hence Sesbania fallows are called non-coppic<strong>in</strong>g fal<br />
lows. Non-coppic<strong>in</strong>g species <strong>in</strong>clude Tephrosia vogeUi,<br />
Tephrosia c<strong>and</strong>ida, Cajanus cajan <strong>and</strong> Crotalaria <br />
spp. In the case of Sesbania farmers must rely on a <br />
Table 1. Maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield after Sesbania sesban <strong>and</strong> Tephrosia<br />
vogeli; fallows on farmers' fields <strong>in</strong> eastern Zambia dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998·<br />
2000<br />
Fallow species<br />
Maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield t ha'\<br />
L<strong>and</strong> use system (LUS) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />
Farmers test<strong>in</strong>g Sesbania fallow 3.6 2.0 1.6<br />
Sesbania sesban Fertilized maize 4.0 4.0 2.2<br />
fallows<br />
Unfertilized maize 0.8 1.2 0.4<br />
LSD (0.05) 0.7 0.6 1.1<br />
Number of farmers 8 6 4<br />
Farmers test<strong>in</strong>g Tephrosia fallow. 3.1 2.4 1.3<br />
Tephrosia vogelii Fertilized maize 4.2 3.0 2.8<br />
fallows<br />
Unfertilized maize 0.8 0.1 0.5<br />
LSD (0.05) 0.5 0.6 0.9<br />
Number of farmers 17 9 5<br />
142<br />
<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> legumes <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa