15.03.2015 Views

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

times with regionally specific adaptations. However,<br />

the amount of fertilizer used <strong>in</strong> southern Africa<br />

is very small <strong>in</strong> comparison to other parts of the<br />

world, with the highest rates found <strong>in</strong> a country like<br />

Zimbabwe <strong>in</strong> the commercial sector. For most<br />

smallholders, fertilizer use is as low as 5 kg/hal<br />

year (Gerner <strong>and</strong> Harris, 1993). While the need <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creased use of <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers <strong>in</strong> southern Africa<br />

is clear, there are problems with an approach<br />

based exclusively on <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers where water<br />

supply is limited <strong>and</strong> variable. In many areas<br />

outside the higher ra<strong>in</strong>fall zones or away from irrigated<br />

areas, any sensible farmer will use expensive<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilizer with caution <strong>and</strong> supplement with<br />

organic sources. In most areas, fertilizer is there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

used ma<strong>in</strong>ly on home fields, gardens or high value<br />

crops such as cotton <strong>and</strong> vegetables.<br />

While the need <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased fertilizer use <strong>in</strong> Southern<br />

Africa is apparent to all, the challenge of achiev<strong>in</strong>g<br />

this is very great. A high external <strong>in</strong>put strategy<br />

cannot rely on fertilizer-seeds-credit packages, without<br />

address<strong>in</strong>g other requirements <strong>for</strong> successful<br />

uptake of green revolution technologies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

water management, credit systems, <strong>in</strong>frastructure,<br />

fertilizer manufacture <strong>and</strong> supply <strong>and</strong> access to<br />

markets. Most African conditions are unlike the<br />

pla<strong>in</strong>s of Asia so that the approaches which produced<br />

such successes there are not easily transferable<br />

to the African cont<strong>in</strong>ent. Given the acute poverty<br />

<strong>and</strong> limited access to m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilizers an ecologically<br />

robust approach of improved fallows is discussed<br />

<strong>in</strong> this synthesis. This approach is a prodllct<br />

of many years of agro<strong>for</strong>estry research <strong>and</strong> development<br />

by ICRAF <strong>and</strong> its partners <strong>in</strong> southern Africa.<br />

Improved Fallows<br />

Improved fallows <strong>and</strong> their topology<br />

Improved fallows are the deliberate plant<strong>in</strong>g of fastgrow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

species, usually wood tree legumes, <strong>for</strong><br />

rapid replenishment of soil fertility. Fallows are as<br />

old as agriculture <strong>in</strong> southern Africa. Grass fallows<br />

are a common feature of the farm<strong>in</strong>g systems <strong>in</strong> the<br />

sub humid <strong>and</strong> semiarid zones of the region. Improve<br />

fallows were not a major area of research dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the green revolution due to the focus to elim<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

soil constra<strong>in</strong>ts by use of m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilizers.<br />

With the development of the second soil fertility<br />

paradigm based on susta<strong>in</strong>ability considerations<br />

(Sanchez, 1994), the biological dimensions of soil<br />

fertility began to receive <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g attention <strong>and</strong><br />

research on improved fallows has <strong>in</strong>creased s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

the mid 1980s. Reported work <strong>in</strong>cludes Kwesiga<br />

<strong>and</strong> Coe (1994), Drechsel et al. (1996), Rao et al.<br />

(1998) <strong>and</strong> Snapp et al. (1998).<br />

Large-scale adoption of short-term improved fallows<br />

by farmers is now tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> southern Africa<br />

<strong>and</strong> east Africa. The ma<strong>in</strong> species used are legumes<br />

of the genus Sesbania, Tephrosia, Leucaena,<br />

Gliricidia, Crotalaria <strong>and</strong> Cajanus.<br />

Non-coppic<strong>in</strong>g fallows<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the sem<strong>in</strong>al work of Kwesiga <strong>and</strong> Coe (1994)<br />

on Sesbania fallows, a lot has been learnt about the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of improved fallows. There has been<br />

extensive test<strong>in</strong>g ·of fallows on farm to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the maize productivity <strong>and</strong> processes that <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

fallow per<strong>for</strong>mance. The per<strong>for</strong>mance of Sesbania<br />

<strong>and</strong> Tephrosia <strong>in</strong> a wide range of biophysical conditions<br />

is shown on Table 1. Improved fallows of twoyear<br />

duration with both species significantly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

maize yields well above unfertilized maize<br />

(which is a cpmmon farmer's practice). Fertilized<br />

maize per<strong>for</strong>med better than improved fallows <strong>in</strong><br />

most cases. It is very clear from these results that<br />

the residual effects of fallows on maize yield decl<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

after the second year of cropp<strong>in</strong>g. In a third<br />

year of cropp<strong>in</strong>g, maize yields were similar to unfertilized<br />

maize. Farmers have asked researchers<br />

how can they extend the residual effects of fallows<br />

beyond two years of cropp<strong>in</strong>g. Suggestions have<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded apply<strong>in</strong>g low rates of <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer <strong>in</strong><br />

the second or third year of cropp<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease residual<br />

effects. Alternatively, farmers can use species<br />

of trees which coppice after cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> use<br />

coppice regrowth to <strong>in</strong>crease residual effects.<br />

Coppic<strong>in</strong>g fallows <br />

Most of the work on improved fallows has concen­<br />

trated on Sesbania sesban, but this species has draw­<br />

backs. When cut at fallow term<strong>in</strong>ation, which is 2­<br />

years of growth, it will not resprout or coppice. <br />

Hence Sesbania fallows are called non-coppic<strong>in</strong>g fal­<br />

lows. Non-coppic<strong>in</strong>g species <strong>in</strong>clude Tephrosia vogeUi,<br />

Tephrosia c<strong>and</strong>ida, Cajanus cajan <strong>and</strong> Crotalaria <br />

spp. In the case of Sesbania farmers must rely on a <br />

Table 1. Maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield after Sesbania sesban <strong>and</strong> Tephrosia<br />

vogeli; fallows on farmers' fields <strong>in</strong> eastern Zambia dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998·<br />

2000<br />

Fallow species<br />

Maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield t ha'\<br />

L<strong>and</strong> use system (LUS) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3<br />

Farmers test<strong>in</strong>g Sesbania fallow 3.6 2.0 1.6<br />

Sesbania sesban Fertilized maize 4.0 4.0 2.2<br />

fallows<br />

Unfertilized maize 0.8 1.2 0.4<br />

LSD (0.05) 0.7 0.6 1.1<br />

Number of farmers 8 6 4<br />

Farmers test<strong>in</strong>g Tephrosia fallow. 3.1 2.4 1.3<br />

Tephrosia vogelii Fertilized maize 4.2 3.0 2.8<br />

fallows<br />

Unfertilized maize 0.8 0.1 0.5<br />

LSD (0.05) 0.5 0.6 0.9<br />

Number of farmers 17 9 5<br />

142<br />

<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> legumes <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!