15.03.2015 Views

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3. Residual effects of lim<strong>in</strong>g sources on soil pH,<br />

exchangeable calcium <strong>and</strong> magnesium <strong>for</strong> Mufulira soil<br />

series dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1996/97 season<br />

Treatment <strong>Soil</strong> pH (CaCh) Ca Mg<br />

(cmolc kg 1 )<br />

Control 4.3b 0.45b O.lOb<br />

Nampundwe tail<strong>in</strong>gs 4.8a 0.82b 0.30a<br />

Agricultural lime 5.0a 1.3a 0.18b<br />

Means <strong>in</strong> columns followed by the same letter are not<br />

significantly different at P - 0.05.<br />

Both NMT <strong>and</strong> AgLi produced a l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

soil pH with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rates of lim<strong>in</strong>g (Figure 1).<br />

However <strong>for</strong> AgLi, no further <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> soil pH<br />

occurred beyond 2.0 t ha ot • The soil pH at the new<br />

site was raised more quickly than that at the old site<br />

established <strong>in</strong> 1995/96. It appears that management<br />

practices of the research field <strong>in</strong> which the trial site<br />

was located could be the reason <strong>for</strong> differences <strong>in</strong><br />

the overall soil chemistry of the two locations belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the same study soil. The pH result <strong>for</strong><br />

1996/97 strongly <strong>in</strong>dicates that 2.0 t ha ot is the optimal<br />

lim<strong>in</strong>g rate <strong>for</strong> this soil. This confirms the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

by Muny<strong>in</strong>da (1984) that 2.0 t ha oJ was the optimal<br />

lim<strong>in</strong>g rate <strong>for</strong> the Mufulira soil series.<br />

The lim<strong>in</strong>g materials did not significantly <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> the 1995/96 season (Figure<br />

2). However, the residual effect of both NMT <strong>and</strong><br />

AgLi applied <strong>in</strong> the 1995/96 season did not significantly<br />

(P < 0.05) <strong>in</strong>crease soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield. It appears<br />

that despite the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> soil pH of Mufulira<br />

soil series from 4.3 to 5.0, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> exchangeable<br />

calcium by . AgLi <strong>and</strong> exchangeable<br />

magnesium by NMT, the soil conditions <strong>for</strong> healthy<br />

growth of soybean were not atta<strong>in</strong>ed. Mufulira soil<br />

series is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the kaol<strong>in</strong>ite type of clay<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral with a substantial amount of amorphous<br />

iron <strong>and</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>ium oxides. S<strong>in</strong>ce tmder most conditions<br />

complete neutralization is not achieved<br />

when acid soils are limed, hydroxyl compounds of<br />

alum<strong>in</strong>ium <strong>and</strong> iron could rema<strong>in</strong> (Coleman <strong>and</strong><br />

Thomas, 1967). There is a time lag between a change<br />

<strong>in</strong> soil pH <strong>and</strong> subsequent changes <strong>in</strong> the concentration<br />

of alum<strong>in</strong>ium (Mtmy<strong>in</strong>da, 1984) be<strong>for</strong>e signifi-<br />

cant yields are realized. It follows that though .the<br />

soil pH of Mufulira soil series was <strong>in</strong>creased from<br />

4.3 to 4.8, the alumirlium polycomplexes were not<br />

<strong>in</strong>stantaneously. reduced to their chemical <strong>in</strong>ert<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms, which reduce slowly over several years.<br />

Thus, at a soil pH 4.8 that was atta<strong>in</strong>ed by NMT it<br />

appears that monomeric exchangeable alum<strong>in</strong>ium<br />

that rema<strong>in</strong>ed tm-neutralized could have affected<br />

the soybean yield. Coleman <strong>and</strong> Thomas (1967) <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

that the products of complete neutralization<br />

that are atta<strong>in</strong>ed at a pH higher than 8.3 aTe exchangeable<br />

calcium <strong>and</strong> magnesium <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ert hydroxides<br />

of alum<strong>in</strong>ium <strong>and</strong> iron. There<strong>for</strong>e, to atta<strong>in</strong><br />

near or complete neutralization of soil acidity <strong>for</strong><br />

soils of the Mufulira series requires a longer period<br />

of residual effect than the two-year period of this<br />

study.<br />

NMT <strong>in</strong>creased soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield l<strong>in</strong>early with<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g lim<strong>in</strong>g rates, with the maximum yield of<br />

1.1 t ha ot obta<strong>in</strong>ed at3 t ha o 1Jime (Figure 3). The soybean<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> yield obta<strong>in</strong>ed . is similar to yields obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by Coma et al. (1990) at the lim<strong>in</strong>g rate of 2.0<br />

t ha ot on a related soil series. NMT significantly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield over AgLi <strong>and</strong> the control<br />

treatment. The trend <strong>in</strong> soybean yield after the<br />

AgLi treatment was not consistent. At 2 t ha oJ AgLi<br />

produced a lower gra<strong>in</strong> yield than NMT. The depressed<br />

soybean yield could have been due to the<br />

loss of AgLi through water erosion <strong>in</strong> two AgLi<br />

treated plots that had a slope.<br />

.E'"<br />

'"~ ..,<br />

Qi<br />

'>'<br />

c<br />

'n;<br />

(j,<br />

c<br />

Q)<br />

'"<br />

.g,<br />

0<br />

en<br />

3000<br />

1500<br />

0<br />

01995116 D19H111 I<br />

Control Agric. lime M<strong>in</strong>e Tail<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Treatment (tlha)<br />

Figure 2. Effects of lim<strong>in</strong>g sources on soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>for</strong><br />

1995/96 <strong>and</strong> 1996/97 seasons<br />

6<br />

5.5<br />

5<br />

4.5<br />

4<br />

a 3.5<br />

'5 3<br />

en 2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0 .5<br />

o<br />

IB Agrie. LIme 111 M<strong>in</strong>e Tail<strong>in</strong>gs I<br />

control 2 3<br />

lime rates (tlha)<br />

Figure 1. Effects of lim<strong>in</strong>g rates on soil pH, planted <strong>in</strong> 1996/97<br />

season<br />

_ 1200<br />

i .. 1000<br />

..,<br />

800 a;<br />

'>'<br />

c 600<br />

i!<br />

0><br />

iii<br />

400<br />

~ 200<br />

0<br />

r/l<br />

0<br />

control 2 3<br />

Lime rale (tlha)<br />

Figure 3. Effect of lim<strong>in</strong>g rates on soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield (Cv. Santa<br />

Rosa) <strong>for</strong> the new site planted <strong>in</strong> 1996/97 season<br />

<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!