Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 3. Residual effects of lim<strong>in</strong>g sources on soil pH,<br />
exchangeable calcium <strong>and</strong> magnesium <strong>for</strong> Mufulira soil<br />
series dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1996/97 season<br />
Treatment <strong>Soil</strong> pH (CaCh) Ca Mg<br />
(cmolc kg 1 )<br />
Control 4.3b 0.45b O.lOb<br />
Nampundwe tail<strong>in</strong>gs 4.8a 0.82b 0.30a<br />
Agricultural lime 5.0a 1.3a 0.18b<br />
Means <strong>in</strong> columns followed by the same letter are not<br />
significantly different at P - 0.05.<br />
Both NMT <strong>and</strong> AgLi produced a l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
soil pH with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rates of lim<strong>in</strong>g (Figure 1).<br />
However <strong>for</strong> AgLi, no further <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> soil pH<br />
occurred beyond 2.0 t ha ot • The soil pH at the new<br />
site was raised more quickly than that at the old site<br />
established <strong>in</strong> 1995/96. It appears that management<br />
practices of the research field <strong>in</strong> which the trial site<br />
was located could be the reason <strong>for</strong> differences <strong>in</strong><br />
the overall soil chemistry of the two locations belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to the same study soil. The pH result <strong>for</strong><br />
1996/97 strongly <strong>in</strong>dicates that 2.0 t ha ot is the optimal<br />
lim<strong>in</strong>g rate <strong>for</strong> this soil. This confirms the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
by Muny<strong>in</strong>da (1984) that 2.0 t ha oJ was the optimal<br />
lim<strong>in</strong>g rate <strong>for</strong> the Mufulira soil series.<br />
The lim<strong>in</strong>g materials did not significantly <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> the 1995/96 season (Figure<br />
2). However, the residual effect of both NMT <strong>and</strong><br />
AgLi applied <strong>in</strong> the 1995/96 season did not significantly<br />
(P < 0.05) <strong>in</strong>crease soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield. It appears<br />
that despite the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> soil pH of Mufulira<br />
soil series from 4.3 to 5.0, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> exchangeable<br />
calcium by . AgLi <strong>and</strong> exchangeable<br />
magnesium by NMT, the soil conditions <strong>for</strong> healthy<br />
growth of soybean were not atta<strong>in</strong>ed. Mufulira soil<br />
series is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the kaol<strong>in</strong>ite type of clay<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eral with a substantial amount of amorphous<br />
iron <strong>and</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>ium oxides. S<strong>in</strong>ce tmder most conditions<br />
complete neutralization is not achieved<br />
when acid soils are limed, hydroxyl compounds of<br />
alum<strong>in</strong>ium <strong>and</strong> iron could rema<strong>in</strong> (Coleman <strong>and</strong><br />
Thomas, 1967). There is a time lag between a change<br />
<strong>in</strong> soil pH <strong>and</strong> subsequent changes <strong>in</strong> the concentration<br />
of alum<strong>in</strong>ium (Mtmy<strong>in</strong>da, 1984) be<strong>for</strong>e signifi-<br />
cant yields are realized. It follows that though .the<br />
soil pH of Mufulira soil series was <strong>in</strong>creased from<br />
4.3 to 4.8, the alumirlium polycomplexes were not<br />
<strong>in</strong>stantaneously. reduced to their chemical <strong>in</strong>ert<br />
<strong>for</strong>ms, which reduce slowly over several years.<br />
Thus, at a soil pH 4.8 that was atta<strong>in</strong>ed by NMT it<br />
appears that monomeric exchangeable alum<strong>in</strong>ium<br />
that rema<strong>in</strong>ed tm-neutralized could have affected<br />
the soybean yield. Coleman <strong>and</strong> Thomas (1967) <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />
that the products of complete neutralization<br />
that are atta<strong>in</strong>ed at a pH higher than 8.3 aTe exchangeable<br />
calcium <strong>and</strong> magnesium <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ert hydroxides<br />
of alum<strong>in</strong>ium <strong>and</strong> iron. There<strong>for</strong>e, to atta<strong>in</strong><br />
near or complete neutralization of soil acidity <strong>for</strong><br />
soils of the Mufulira series requires a longer period<br />
of residual effect than the two-year period of this<br />
study.<br />
NMT <strong>in</strong>creased soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield l<strong>in</strong>early with<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g lim<strong>in</strong>g rates, with the maximum yield of<br />
1.1 t ha ot obta<strong>in</strong>ed at3 t ha o 1Jime (Figure 3). The soybean<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield obta<strong>in</strong>ed . is similar to yields obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by Coma et al. (1990) at the lim<strong>in</strong>g rate of 2.0<br />
t ha ot on a related soil series. NMT significantly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield over AgLi <strong>and</strong> the control<br />
treatment. The trend <strong>in</strong> soybean yield after the<br />
AgLi treatment was not consistent. At 2 t ha oJ AgLi<br />
produced a lower gra<strong>in</strong> yield than NMT. The depressed<br />
soybean yield could have been due to the<br />
loss of AgLi through water erosion <strong>in</strong> two AgLi<br />
treated plots that had a slope.<br />
.E'"<br />
'"~ ..,<br />
Qi<br />
'>'<br />
c<br />
'n;<br />
(j,<br />
c<br />
Q)<br />
'"<br />
.g,<br />
0<br />
en<br />
3000<br />
1500<br />
0<br />
01995116 D19H111 I<br />
Control Agric. lime M<strong>in</strong>e Tail<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Treatment (tlha)<br />
Figure 2. Effects of lim<strong>in</strong>g sources on soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>for</strong><br />
1995/96 <strong>and</strong> 1996/97 seasons<br />
6<br />
5.5<br />
5<br />
4.5<br />
4<br />
a 3.5<br />
'5 3<br />
en 2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0 .5<br />
o<br />
IB Agrie. LIme 111 M<strong>in</strong>e Tail<strong>in</strong>gs I<br />
control 2 3<br />
lime rates (tlha)<br />
Figure 1. Effects of lim<strong>in</strong>g rates on soil pH, planted <strong>in</strong> 1996/97<br />
season<br />
_ 1200<br />
i .. 1000<br />
..,<br />
800 a;<br />
'>'<br />
c 600<br />
i!<br />
0><br />
iii<br />
400<br />
~ 200<br />
0<br />
r/l<br />
0<br />
control 2 3<br />
Lime rale (tlha)<br />
Figure 3. Effect of lim<strong>in</strong>g rates on soybean gra<strong>in</strong> yield (Cv. Santa<br />
Rosa) <strong>for</strong> the new site planted <strong>in</strong> 1996/97 season<br />
<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa<br />
207