15.03.2015 Views

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which did not thrive when shaded by maize. By<br />

June, the bean crop had covered the ground but further<br />

growth was retarded by frost. Plough<strong>in</strong>g under<br />

was <strong>in</strong> September with maize planted <strong>in</strong> December.<br />

The presence of a bean crop at the !11aize gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stage slightly reduced maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield. Dolichos<br />

bean reduced the yield of the relayed maize<br />

crop <strong>and</strong> the subsequent maize crop, whilst white<br />

jack bean, khaki jack bean <strong>and</strong> dhal significantly <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

maize gra<strong>in</strong> yields (Arnold 1926-27).<br />

Incorporation of immature vs. mature green manure<br />

crops<br />

Arnold (1926, 1927 <strong>and</strong> 1929) reported results from<br />

a series of experiments that determ<strong>in</strong>ed the effects<br />

of leav<strong>in</strong>g green manure crops to mature be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>in</strong>corporation<br />

compared with plough<strong>in</strong>g under "the<br />

green manure crops at first flower<strong>in</strong>g. The other primary<br />

objective of the trials was to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

whether the plough<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> of two consecutive green<br />

manure crops <strong>in</strong> the same season would have toxic<br />

effects on the l<strong>and</strong> or whether the additional organic<br />

matter would be more beneficial than the plough<strong>in</strong>g<br />

under of one mature crop. Sunnhemp, velvet bean<br />

<strong>and</strong> dolichos bean were used <strong>in</strong> the experiment. Incorporation<br />

of mature crops was 5-6 weeks later<br />

than the <strong>in</strong>corporation of immature crops at flower<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

This work found out that the grow<strong>in</strong>g season was<br />

too short to permit two velvet bean crops to mature<br />

unless they were ploughed under be<strong>for</strong>e podd<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The biomass of matUre crops was double <strong>for</strong> velvet<br />

bean <strong>and</strong> dolichos bean <strong>and</strong> four times <strong>for</strong> sunnhemp,<br />

compared with two immature crops. Subsequent<br />

maize yields obta<strong>in</strong>ed after immature green<br />

manures were less than those from mature crops,<br />

mostly rl.ue to a higher biomass <strong>in</strong> the mature crops.<br />

One fully matured green manure crop was better<br />

than two immature crops. These were also compareg<br />

with the effect of a reaped mature velvet bean<br />

on the subsequent maize.<br />

These experiments also determ<strong>in</strong>ed whether irrespective<br />

of mass of green manure per unit l<strong>and</strong> area,<br />

immature crops ploughed under will ben~fit the<br />

l<strong>and</strong> as mU(;h as if the crops are fully grown. Mature<br />

plants provide a higher percent of organic matter<br />

than immature plants. Fully developed crops had a<br />

more beneficial effect than a partially developed<br />

crop. Mature green .manure crops of velvet bean<br />

<strong>and</strong> sunnhemp more than trebled maize yield <strong>in</strong> the<br />

first season after green manur<strong>in</strong>g whilst immature<br />

crops doubled maize yields compared with cont<strong>in</strong>u­<br />

·ous unfertilized maize. The second season maize<br />

after both ma'ture <strong>and</strong> immature green manure<br />

crops did not benefit from green manur<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Timson (1946) also conc1uded that plough<strong>in</strong>g under <br />

of a green manure crop be<strong>for</strong>e the end of the ra<strong>in</strong>y <br />

season led to excessive leach<strong>in</strong>g of the nitrogen. <br />

Plough<strong>in</strong>g under at the end of April compared to <br />

February <strong>and</strong> March resulted <strong>in</strong> higher gra<strong>in</strong> yields <br />

of the subsequent maize crop. <br />

<strong>Green</strong> manure crops <strong>in</strong> rotations <br />

Rotation experiments were carried out <strong>and</strong> green <br />

manure legumes were recommended <strong>in</strong> the differ­<br />

ent rotation systems; <strong>in</strong> pure crop production sys­<br />

tems as well as <strong>for</strong> crop <strong>and</strong> livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g sys­<br />

tems. An example of a recommended rotation, de­<br />

signed to meet the needs of a gra<strong>in</strong> farmer whose <br />

<strong>in</strong>come was solely dependent on maize <strong>and</strong> ground­<br />

nut, is given below. <br />

Year 1 = Maize + fertilizer<br />

Year 2 =<strong>Green</strong> manure legume<br />

Year 3 = Maize<br />

Year 4 =Groundnut<br />

A supply of humus <strong>in</strong> the soil' was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

plough<strong>in</strong>g under the velvet bean <strong>and</strong> dolichos bean<br />

green manures. The green manure crops followed<br />

immediately after the maize crop that received m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />

fertilizer, hence the green manure benefited<br />

from the resid ue of the fertilizer left <strong>in</strong> the soil. In<br />

this way, an adequate supply of humus was reta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> the soil <strong>for</strong> the maize that followed the<br />

green manure crop.<br />

For dairy farmers, succulent legume crops were also<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the rotation to provide ample feed <strong>for</strong><br />

livestock, <strong>for</strong> example.<br />

Year 1 =Maize plus farmyard manure<br />

Year 2 = Oats, velvet bean or dolichos bean mixtures<br />

<strong>for</strong> hay<br />

Year 3 = Maize plus m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilizers<br />

Year 4 = Sweet potatoes (succulent crop <strong>for</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

food <strong>for</strong> stockfeed)<br />

The rotational experiments highlighted the drawbacks<br />

of cont<strong>in</strong>uous (year-after-year) maize cropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on the same l<strong>and</strong>. Over 13 years, maize yields<br />

were trebled <strong>in</strong> planned rotations compared with<br />

unplanried rotations similar to those found <strong>in</strong> smallholder<br />

communal areas, where cont<strong>in</strong>uous maize<br />

cropp<strong>in</strong>g is very common. Leav<strong>in</strong>g the fields fallow<br />

was also · found to be less productive when compared<br />

to <strong>in</strong>clusion ofgreen manures <strong>for</strong> fodder purposes<br />

or exclusively as green manures. It was concluded<br />

that when farm stocks <strong>and</strong> crops are judi­<br />

, ciously comb<strong>in</strong>ed, the permanent fertility of the soil<br />

is <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>and</strong> larger crops are secured. This was<br />

calculated to be profitable <strong>and</strong> a <strong>for</strong>m of <strong>in</strong>surance<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st unfavorable seasons.<br />

!<br />

<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>Legumes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!