15.03.2015 Views

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

een renewed <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> green manure technologies<br />

cis the price of mmeralfertiliser has <strong>in</strong>creased.<br />

The Risk Management Project (RMPJ is a project under<br />

the CIMMYT Natural Resources Management<br />

Group with a broad objective of improv<strong>in</strong>g farm<br />

<strong>in</strong>comes <strong>and</strong> food self-reliance <strong>for</strong> poor smallholder<br />

farmers <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe <strong>and</strong> Malawi l;>y address<strong>in</strong>g<br />

problems of low soil fertility, climatic variability,<br />

low <strong>and</strong> unstable agro ecosystem productivity<br />

through the use of simulation modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> farmer<br />

participatory research. Risk Management Project<br />

staff have been work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> very close collaboration<br />

with a group of 14 farmers <strong>in</strong> the Zimuto smallholder<br />

area of Masv<strong>in</strong>go s<strong>in</strong>ce 1999. The work has<br />

focussed on farmer-led on-farm experimentation<br />

with several legume-based soil fertility technologies<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g out of the <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> Network trials. The<br />

approach used aims to enable farmers, together<br />

with researchers, to analyse <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> farmer<br />

strategies <strong>and</strong> practices of soil fertility management<br />

<strong>and</strong> to identify technologies that both meet farmers'<br />

needs <strong>and</strong> are susta<strong>in</strong>able. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results from<br />

the fieldwork <strong>and</strong> from focussed group discussions<br />

with the farmers <strong>in</strong>dicate the robustness of mucuna<br />

under smallholder conditions <strong>and</strong> great <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong><br />

the mucuna technology amongst the farmers.<br />

However, selection of an appropriate technology<br />

<strong>and</strong> management options is complicated by climatic<br />

variability. This means that management options<br />

must be assessed on a probabilistic basis. Mo.reover,<br />

the development of appropriate technologies,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the test<strong>in</strong>g of the components, is complicated<br />

by season-to-season variability. Experiments to test<br />

different technologies must be run over many seasons<br />

to obta<strong>in</strong> reliable results. This is expensive<br />

<strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> many cases, impracticaL Simulation models,<br />

which <strong>in</strong>tegrate the major physical <strong>and</strong> biological<br />

processes, provide a solution to this problem.<br />

Simulation Study<br />

Simulations were carried out us<strong>in</strong>g the APSIM<br />

(Agricultural Production Systems SIMuJator) model<br />

<strong>in</strong> conjunction with a 47-year long-term weather<br />

dataset <strong>for</strong> Masv<strong>in</strong>go, which is around 30 km south<br />

of the study area <strong>and</strong> about 50 mm/year drier. The<br />

APSIM software system allows a wide range of configurations<br />

of crops, sequences, mixtures <strong>and</strong> management<br />

practices to be simulated. It provides a<br />

flexible structure <strong>for</strong> the simulation of climatic <strong>and</strong><br />

soil management effects on growth of crops <strong>in</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

systems <strong>and</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> the resource base. A<br />

detaileQ>~scription pf APSIM, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g its capabilities,_d~~Jgn<br />

features, structure, user <strong>in</strong>terface <strong>and</strong><br />

the derivation of its ma<strong>in</strong> biological <strong>and</strong> environmental<br />

modules is provided by McCown, Hammer,<br />

Hargreaves, Holzworth <strong>and</strong> Freebaim (1995).<br />

The simulation set-up consisted of grow<strong>in</strong>g either:<br />

1. A maize crop, receiv<strong>in</strong>g various levels of N,<br />

year after year. The N levels ranged from 0 kg<br />

N /ha to 100 kg N /ha.<br />

2. A crop of mucuna from the open<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>s of the<br />

season. The crop of mucuna was managed <strong>in</strong><br />

two ways:<br />

a) either the crop was grown to maturity<br />

<strong>and</strong> harvested on the 1 st of July with<br />

60% of the residues <strong>in</strong>corporated on the<br />

1 st of November just be<strong>for</strong>e maize plant<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Management 1).<br />

b) or, the mucuna is harvested at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of gra<strong>in</strong> fill with 90% of the<br />

mucuna material <strong>in</strong>corporated at that<br />

time (Management 2).<br />

3. The muct<strong>in</strong>a crop was grown <strong>in</strong> rotation with<br />

an unfertilised maize crop (cv. SC501). Two<br />

cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems were simulated <strong>for</strong> both residue<br />

management systems with either one maize<br />

crop after every mucuna crop (mucuna-maize<br />

rotation) or two maize crops after every mucuna<br />

crop (mucuna-maize-maize rotatioll).<br />

Results <strong>and</strong> Discussions<br />

Simuiation runs on maize response to different<br />

amounts of m<strong>in</strong>eral fertiliser <strong>and</strong> on maize follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a mucuna crop were done us<strong>in</strong>g the long-term<br />

climatic data from Masv<strong>in</strong>go. On moderate fertility<br />

soils typical of most of the topl<strong>and</strong> fields found <strong>in</strong><br />

Zimuto, maize gra<strong>in</strong> yields <strong>in</strong> the absence of m<strong>in</strong>eral<br />

fertilisers were simulated to be, on average, 494<br />

kg/ha. The yields from such unfertilised crops<br />

range from total crop failure to about 1600 kg/ha.­<br />

These values are similar to values quoted elsewhere<br />

from on-farm <strong>and</strong> on-station results (Shamudzarira<br />

<strong>and</strong> Robertson, 2002) <strong>and</strong> are similar to measured<br />

yields <strong>for</strong> unfertilised maize <strong>in</strong> the area. Figure 1<br />

shows the simulated responses to a range of different<br />

amounts of m<strong>in</strong>eral fertiliser additions over<br />

seven seasons on a typica'lly low fertility soil. There<br />

is enormous variation <strong>in</strong> maize response to any<br />

given rate of fertiliser applied, with -the range be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

greater at higher rates of N applied. Smallholder<br />

farmers <strong>in</strong> this area normally cite the "risk" associated<br />

with the wide variations <strong>in</strong> yield with N application<br />

(Figure 1) as one of the reasons they use<br />

small amounts of m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilisers. The simulations<br />

also show that <strong>in</strong> 20% of the seasons there is<br />

no benefit <strong>in</strong> use of m<strong>in</strong>eral fertilisers <strong>in</strong> these environments.<br />

88<br />

<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> legumes <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!