Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 4. Yield of maize (t ha I) follow<strong>in</strong>g different<br />
cropp<strong>in</strong>g sequences <strong>and</strong> grown at two levels of nitrogen<br />
fertilizer. across 4 years (1984/85··87/88 crop seasons)<br />
Cropp<strong>in</strong>g sequence<br />
N letel~ (kg 'N hal)<br />
Zero 80<br />
Maize 2.55 5~38<br />
Silver leaf 3.85 5.90<br />
Stylo 3.58 5.58<br />
Silverleaf + Rhodes grass 3.05 5.55<br />
Stylo + Rhodes grass 2.83 5.33<br />
Source: MacColI, 1990<br />
were planted to maize <strong>for</strong> three years (1985-88).<br />
Yields were higher when maize followed pasture<br />
legumes with successful establishment, with- ~ilver<br />
leaf out-yield<strong>in</strong>g the other species (Table 4). The<br />
application of <strong>in</strong>organic N <strong>in</strong>creased maize yield,<br />
stress<strong>in</strong>g the need <strong>for</strong> the comb<strong>in</strong>ed use of organic<br />
<strong>and</strong>· <strong>in</strong>organic (m<strong>in</strong>eral) fertilizers.<br />
Use of comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>puts from organic <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>organic<br />
(m<strong>in</strong>eral) sources appears to be the best approach to<br />
address soil fertility problems. Organic fertilizers<br />
improve the soil physical, chemical <strong>and</strong> biological<br />
properties. They also help to build up soil orgariic<br />
matter because nutrients are released slowly after<br />
m<strong>in</strong>eralization. However, the amount <strong>and</strong> quality<br />
of the organic fertilizers is <strong>in</strong>sufficient to provide<br />
adequate amounts of nutrients <strong>for</strong> crops, hence the<br />
need to supplement with <strong>in</strong>organic sources. Mwatoet<br />
al. (1999) conducted a 2-year study on comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>in</strong>puts of crop residues <strong>for</strong> smallholder maize production<br />
<strong>in</strong> Malawi. The overall objective was to·exam<strong>in</strong>e<br />
the effect of apply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers<br />
<strong>and</strong> crop residues to the soil on the subsequent<br />
maize yield. Crop residues from maize <strong>and</strong> different<br />
varieties of soya bean were <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the<br />
soil. Inorganic N was applied to maize at several<br />
rates. Maize gra<strong>in</strong> yields were <strong>in</strong>creased from 0.5 t<br />
to 1.3 t ha- I after the addition of soyabean residues.<br />
plus <strong>in</strong>organiC fertilizer. .<br />
Agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />
Agro<strong>for</strong>estry refers to those l<strong>and</strong> use systems <strong>in</strong><br />
which woody perennials are grown <strong>in</strong> association<br />
with herbaceous plants (crops, pastures) <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
livestock <strong>in</strong> a spatial arrangement, a rotation, or<br />
both, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> which there are both ecological ·<strong>and</strong><br />
economic <strong>in</strong>teractions between the tree <strong>and</strong> non tree<br />
components of the system (Young, 1989). Alley<br />
cropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> improved fallows are among the<br />
agro<strong>for</strong>estry systems practiced by some farmers <strong>in</strong><br />
Malawi. Choice of a technology depends on the<br />
problem to be addre$sed, <strong>and</strong> the availability of resources<br />
such as l<strong>and</strong>, ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>and</strong> labour. Research<br />
work <strong>in</strong> Malawi has revealed the potential of rais<strong>in</strong>g<br />
soil nitrogen <strong>and</strong> maize yields with agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />
technologies (Kwapata, 1994; Malawi Agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />
Team, 1994; Makumba, 1998; <strong>and</strong> Phiri, 1999).<br />
Maize yields after L leucocephala, S.· spectabilis <strong>and</strong> S.<br />
sesban were 4.8, 45 <strong>and</strong> 4.4 t ha- I respectively, compared<br />
with 3.2 t ha- I produced from sole-crop maize<br />
plots (Chirwa <strong>and</strong> Maghembe, 1994). However,<br />
there are limitations with agro<strong>for</strong>estry systems.<br />
These <strong>in</strong>clude:<br />
• . The benefits from agro<strong>for</strong>estry technologies are<br />
long term<br />
• A high labour requirement with some technologies,<br />
e.g. alley cropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• High seed requirement, imply<strong>in</strong>g a cost to the<br />
farmers<br />
• Problems with seedl<strong>in</strong>g establishment<br />
• Insect pestattack on some tree species that have a<br />
high biomass potential, such as L. leucocephala,<br />
that is susceptible to psyllids (Heteropsylla cubana)<br />
• Some tree species per<strong>for</strong>m poorly on acid soils<br />
because of low available phosphorus.<br />
A lot of research has been conducted with agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />
to identify suitable c<strong>and</strong>idate species <strong>for</strong> a particular<br />
technology, <strong>for</strong> biomass production, tim<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>and</strong> application methods <strong>for</strong> biomass, <strong>and</strong> the effect<br />
of the technology on maize yield. Faidherbia albida is<br />
one of the tree species used <strong>in</strong> agro<strong>for</strong>estry. It is<br />
found grow<strong>in</strong>g naturally <strong>in</strong> farmers' fields <strong>in</strong> some<br />
parts of Malawi. The yield benefits to maize grown<br />
under F. albida trees has been reported by many <strong>in</strong>vestigators,<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Malawi Agro<strong>for</strong>estry<br />
Team (1994). Inorganic fertilizer supplements significantly<br />
further <strong>in</strong>crease maize gra<strong>in</strong> yield under<br />
the trees. Some of the c<strong>and</strong>idate tree species <strong>for</strong><br />
agro<strong>for</strong>etsry are Cassia siammea, Gliricidia sepium,<br />
Leucaena leucocephala, Senna spectabilis <strong>and</strong> Sesbania<br />
sesban. Chiyenda <strong>and</strong> Materechera (1987) conducted<br />
experiments from the 1983/84 to 1985/86<br />
crop seasons with L. leucocephala, C. siamea <strong>and</strong> C.<br />
cajan. The overall goal was to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effect<br />
of <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g prun<strong>in</strong>gs from these species on soil<br />
fertility <strong>and</strong> to assess the response of maize grown<br />
<strong>in</strong> alleys. The treatments were three rates of N<br />
(ma<strong>in</strong> plot); the three tree species with maize, <strong>and</strong><br />
maize alone (sub plot); <strong>and</strong> three alley widths with<br />
three ridges of maize (as sub sub-plots). Phosphate,<br />
at 22 kg P ha- I , was applied to all plots at plant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the results, better yields of maize were<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed from plots <strong>in</strong>corporated with the tree<br />
prun<strong>in</strong>gs, although, they were significantly lower<br />
than treatments that received 100 kg N fertilizer ha- I<br />
(Table 5). The plant materials could not provide the<br />
amount of N that would be provided by moderate<br />
rates of <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers.<br />
Kwapata (1994) worked on L. leucocephala <strong>in</strong> an alley<br />
98<br />
<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> legumes <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa