Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Grain Legumes and Green Manures for Soil Fertility in ... - cimmyt
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>and</strong> how best to <strong>in</strong>vest a given bundle of resources<br />
among several alternatives while m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
risk of their portfolios.<br />
Conceptual Framework <strong>and</strong> Hypotheses<br />
For farmers to <strong>in</strong>vest resources <strong>in</strong> new technologies<br />
such as organic <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizers, the rates of<br />
return on these <strong>in</strong>vestments need to be competitive<br />
with returns on available alternative <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
opportunities. With<strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle crop enterprise such<br />
as maize production, the return on <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong><br />
new fertilizer technologies is compared with the<br />
return on capital us<strong>in</strong>g traditional soil-m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
methods. Between different crop enterprises,<br />
returns on <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> new management<br />
technologies are compared aga<strong>in</strong>st other<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g livestock, off-farm activities,<br />
temporary <strong>and</strong> permant labor migration. Because<br />
of the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of payoffs to alternative<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestments, new <strong>in</strong>vestments must fit farmers'<br />
objectives <strong>and</strong> requirements <strong>for</strong> risk <strong>in</strong> addition to<br />
profitability. Because high returns are associated<br />
with high risks, farmers face trade-offs between<br />
allocat<strong>in</strong>g resources to activities with high profits<br />
<strong>and</strong> more desirable but riskier <strong>and</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e less<br />
attractive outcomes compared to activities with low<br />
profits <strong>and</strong> yet less riskier, which makes them more<br />
appeal<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Moss, Weldon, <strong>and</strong> Featherstone (1991) have developed<br />
an approach <strong>for</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g risk-return tradeoffs<br />
<strong>and</strong> diversification opportunities of alternative<br />
farm <strong>in</strong>vestments that is based on the portfolio theory<br />
of f<strong>in</strong>ancial markets <strong>and</strong> the capital asset pric<strong>in</strong>g<br />
model (CAPM). These analysts argue that <strong>for</strong> a new<br />
or c<strong>and</strong>idate enterprise to improve the risk-return<br />
tradeoff provided by any exist<strong>in</strong>g group or portfolio<br />
of enterprises, the follow<strong>in</strong>g condition must hold<br />
If the mean return divided by the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation<br />
of new <strong>in</strong>vestment alternative is greater than<br />
the mean of the whole farm plan's return divided<br />
by the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation times the correlation between<br />
<strong>in</strong>vestments the new <strong>in</strong>vestment will complement<br />
the current operation from a risk-return perspective.<br />
Based on this risk-return condition necessary<br />
<strong>for</strong> a new enterprise to improve the risk-return<br />
trade-off provided by the current farm's portfolio,<br />
one can calculate a risk diversification <strong>in</strong>dex (RDI)<br />
as follows:<br />
r r<br />
RDI _i _.-L n<br />
r'ip<br />
a: I<br />
a: I<br />
If the RDI is greater than zero, the c<strong>and</strong>idate technology<br />
is a good <strong>in</strong>vestment opportunity <strong>for</strong> diversification.<br />
But if RDI is less than zero the c<strong>and</strong>idate<br />
technology offers no ga<strong>in</strong>s through diversification<br />
to the farm household.<br />
Apply<strong>in</strong>g this conceptual framework generates the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g two hypotheses about relationships between<br />
the ~'isk-return characteristics of new technologies,<br />
farmers' risk management strategies, <strong>and</strong><br />
potential <strong>for</strong> adoption that are tested <strong>in</strong> the study:<br />
l. Legume-based soil fertility management technologies<br />
are attractive if they lie on the riskefficient<br />
frontier <strong>and</strong> offer farmers expected returns<br />
that are high enough to compensate them<br />
<strong>for</strong> additional risks; <strong>and</strong><br />
2. Diversification <strong>in</strong>to legume-based soil fertility<br />
management technologies will benefit farmers if<br />
the new technologies complement the current<br />
farm portfolio <strong>and</strong> better offset the total risk of<br />
the whole farm compared to allocat<strong>in</strong>g resources<br />
to alternative farm <strong>and</strong> non-farm <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
opportunities available to farmers.<br />
Where<br />
O'i<br />
= the meim return of the potential new <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
alterna tive,<br />
= the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of the new alternative,<br />
= the mean return of the current whole farm<br />
r" plan, <br />
CY p<br />
= the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of the current whole<br />
farm plan, <strong>and</strong><br />
= the correlation between the current whole<br />
farm plan's return <strong>and</strong> the new enterprise's<br />
return.<br />
Methods<br />
The study uses enterprise <strong>and</strong> whole-farm budget<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
<strong>and</strong> simtllation model<strong>in</strong>g with APSIM <strong>and</strong><br />
@RISK to evaluate the hypotheses. Enterprise<br />
budgets are constructed <strong>for</strong> alternative <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
technologies. Different enterprises are def<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />
different outputs such as maize, sorghum, chickens,<br />
goats <strong>and</strong> cattle; sole st<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> crop mixtures; <strong>and</strong><br />
different crop prod uction technologies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
low <strong>and</strong> high rates of application of kraal manure,<br />
pit-treated manure, <strong>in</strong>organic Nitrogen fertilizer<br />
<strong>and</strong> organic <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>organic fertilizer comb<strong>in</strong>ations.<br />
Enterprise budgets are used to compare the profitability<br />
of maize <strong>and</strong> sorghum crop production us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
traditional methods <strong>and</strong> improved soil fertility<br />
80<br />
<strong>Gra<strong>in</strong></strong> legumes <strong>and</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Manures</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Soil</strong> <strong>Fertility</strong> <strong>in</strong> Southern Africa