12.04.2015 Views

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

days <strong>of</strong> original excavation and the 135 days <strong>of</strong> actual original excavation (i.e. 68 days) to be a<br />

reasonable measure <strong>of</strong> the disruption caused Intercounty by the utility pole relocation issues and<br />

PennDOT's active interference with its work.<br />

We also concur with Intercounty that the 68 extra days <strong>of</strong> original excavation caused by<br />

PennDOT's active interference (and shown on Project records) did entail a full crew for a full day<br />

as asserted in Intercounty's disruption calculation. In fact, the <strong>Board</strong>'s own review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Project's excavation records (primarily Exhibits D-24 and P-77); the excavation quantities and/or<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> roadway worked upon during these extra 68 days (as reflected in these records); and the<br />

Project plans, drawings and elevations, as well as the testimony and pictures introduced into<br />

evidence, all lead us to conclude that Intercounty's assumption <strong>of</strong> a full crew and a full workday<br />

(as reflected in its modification made in Post-Hearing Brief) is fully justified by the excavation<br />

quantities and areas addressed during these 68 extra days. (Exs. D-24, P-77).<br />

That is to say,<br />

although questioned closely by the <strong>Board</strong> as to its assertion <strong>of</strong> a full crew for a full day, and<br />

challenged by Defendant's expert as unconventional methodology, we ultimately do find, upon<br />

the evidence provided, that Intercounty's estimate <strong>of</strong> its lost productivity is justified, adequately<br />

supported and reasonably certain. For the reasons set forth more fully above, we find that<br />

Intercounty incurred lost productivity costs on the Project due to PennDOT's active interference,<br />

as reflected by additional days <strong>of</strong> original excavation, in the sum <strong>of</strong> $364,480. With appropriate<br />

markup pursuant to Section 110.03(d)(4) and (7) <strong>of</strong> the 408 Specifications, this results in total<br />

disruption damages due to Intercounty <strong>of</strong> $405,671.<br />

In contrast, we find no merit to Intercounty's claim for an additional $56,800.00 for the<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> re-handling stockpiled material. Under the Contract, Intercounty had to straighten and<br />

widen approximately three and five-eights miles <strong>of</strong> SR 2001 by excavating hillside and "filling-<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!