12.04.2015 Views

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

disrupted throughout the Project during its work on SR 2001 by multiple instances <strong>of</strong> active<br />

interference on the part <strong>of</strong> PennDOT. In addition to its claim for the typical types <strong>of</strong> damages<br />

resulting from construction delays and disruptions, Intercounty also identifies several other<br />

discrete elements <strong>of</strong> damages resulting from this delay and disruption relating to undercutting<br />

work, stockpiling and rehandling costs, material cost escalation, payment <strong>of</strong> a Rideability<br />

Incentive under the Contract and claims for the payment <strong>of</strong> pre-judgment interest and attorney’s<br />

fees. PennDOT, in turn, has raised legitimate objections to the methods used by Intercounty to<br />

quantify these damages and to several <strong>of</strong> the additional elements <strong>of</strong> damages claimed.<br />

Accordingly, the <strong>Board</strong> will award Intercounty damages for both delay and disruption, but will<br />

adjust certain <strong>of</strong> these amounts to more accurately reflect the damages actually incurred by<br />

Intercounty due to PennDOT’s acts/omissions in breach <strong>of</strong> the Contract, calculated as described<br />

below.<br />

Delay Damages<br />

For the 223 days <strong>of</strong> Project delay, running from the Contract completion date <strong>of</strong><br />

November 6, 2002 to actual completion on June 17, 2003, Intercounty claimed a total <strong>of</strong><br />

$239,547.10 in additional delay costs. These additional costs include: $11,530.27 for Extended<br />

Field Conditions; $89,731.00 for Extended Project Supervision; $22,329.83 for Additional<br />

Maintenance and Protection <strong>of</strong> Traffic; and $115,956.00 for Materials Cost Escalation. To these<br />

costs, Intercounty requests we then apply appropriate markups for overhead and pr<strong>of</strong>it per<br />

Section 110.03(d)(4) and (7) <strong>of</strong> the 408 Specifications. 20<br />

20 Section 110.03(d)(4) and (7) prescribe markups for Extra Work and are frequently utilized to determine<br />

appropriate markup for additional cost claims in PennDOT contract actions. These markups are 40% for labor; 25%<br />

for materials; 5% for equipment; and an additional 8% for subcontract work. These markups to cost are intended to<br />

compensate the contractor, inter alia, for administration, general and project superintendence, bond costs, overhead<br />

and pr<strong>of</strong>it. Pub. 408 (2000 ed.) § 110.03(d)(4) and (7).<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!