12.04.2015 Views

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Delay Damages<br />

225. Intercounty claims it incurred delay damages for the entire Project overrun <strong>of</strong> 223<br />

days (from November 6, 2002, the contract completion date, to June 17, 2003, the actual<br />

completion date) caused by PennDOT’s active interference with its work. (N.T. 5, 29, 31-32;<br />

Ex. P-1J).<br />

226. Intercounty claimed a total <strong>of</strong> $239,547.10 in additional delay costs that include:<br />

$11,530.27 for Extended Field Conditions; $89,731.00 for Extended Project Supervision;<br />

$22,329.83 for Additional Maintenance and Protection <strong>of</strong> Traffic; and $115,956.00 for Material<br />

Cost Escalation. (Plaintiff’s Response to PennDOT’s Post-Hearing Brief, App. 2, p. 3; N.T. 747-<br />

756, 823-824, 835-841, 869; Exs. P-1J, P-85).<br />

227. To these additional delay costs, Intercounty requests the <strong>Board</strong> apply appropriate<br />

markups for overhead and pr<strong>of</strong>it per Section 110.03(d)(4) <strong>of</strong> the 408 Specifications. (Ex. P-1J,<br />

Schedule B, P-60 at pp. 110-5 and 110-6).<br />

228. Section 110.03(d)(4) and (7) prescribe markups for “Extra Work” and are<br />

frequently used to determine appropriate markup for additional cost claims in PennDOT contract<br />

actions. These markups are 40% for labor; 25% for materials; 5% for equipment; and an<br />

additional 8% for subcontract work. (Exs. P-60 at pp.110-5 and 110-6, P-1J, Schedule B; <strong>Board</strong><br />

Finding).<br />

229. These markups to cost compensate the contractor, inter alia, for administration,<br />

general and project superintendence, bond costs, overhead and pr<strong>of</strong>it. (Ex. P-60 at pp. 110-5,<br />

110-6.)<br />

230. Intercounty claims that it incurred costs totaling $ 11,530.27 for Extended Field<br />

Conditions during the 223 delay period (also referred to herein as the “Extended Period”) needed<br />

to complete the Project. These additional costs for Extended Field Conditions include: $4,000<br />

for lot rental; $1,677.40 for trailer rental; $127.79 for inspector’s <strong>of</strong>fice supplies; $1,923.76 for<br />

telephones; $1,690.27 for electricity; $466.40 for job container rental; $1,004.65 for dumpsters<br />

and $640.00 for sanitary facilities. (N.T. 747-756, 823-824, 835-839, 869; Exs. P-1J; P-85).<br />

231. Intercounty established that it incurred $11,530.27 in additional costs for<br />

Extended Field Conditions in the Extended Period. (F.O.F. 222-230; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />

232. With markups pursuant to Section 110.03(d)(4) and (7) <strong>of</strong> the 408 Specifications<br />

on the additional costs for Extended Field Conditions, Intercounty incurred total damages for<br />

Extended Field conditions in the Extended Period <strong>of</strong> $12,470.02. (Exs. P-60 at pp. 110-5 and<br />

110-6; F.O.F. 231; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />

233. Intercounty initially claimed $22,329.83 for additional Maintenance and<br />

Protection <strong>of</strong> Traffic (“MPT”) due to delay through the Extended Period from November 6, 2002<br />

to the end <strong>of</strong> the Project. (N.T. 796-797, 855-856; Exs. P-1J, P-85(10); Ex. D-16).<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!