3720 - Board of Claims
3720 - Board of Claims
3720 - Board of Claims
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Delay Damages<br />
225. Intercounty claims it incurred delay damages for the entire Project overrun <strong>of</strong> 223<br />
days (from November 6, 2002, the contract completion date, to June 17, 2003, the actual<br />
completion date) caused by PennDOT’s active interference with its work. (N.T. 5, 29, 31-32;<br />
Ex. P-1J).<br />
226. Intercounty claimed a total <strong>of</strong> $239,547.10 in additional delay costs that include:<br />
$11,530.27 for Extended Field Conditions; $89,731.00 for Extended Project Supervision;<br />
$22,329.83 for Additional Maintenance and Protection <strong>of</strong> Traffic; and $115,956.00 for Material<br />
Cost Escalation. (Plaintiff’s Response to PennDOT’s Post-Hearing Brief, App. 2, p. 3; N.T. 747-<br />
756, 823-824, 835-841, 869; Exs. P-1J, P-85).<br />
227. To these additional delay costs, Intercounty requests the <strong>Board</strong> apply appropriate<br />
markups for overhead and pr<strong>of</strong>it per Section 110.03(d)(4) <strong>of</strong> the 408 Specifications. (Ex. P-1J,<br />
Schedule B, P-60 at pp. 110-5 and 110-6).<br />
228. Section 110.03(d)(4) and (7) prescribe markups for “Extra Work” and are<br />
frequently used to determine appropriate markup for additional cost claims in PennDOT contract<br />
actions. These markups are 40% for labor; 25% for materials; 5% for equipment; and an<br />
additional 8% for subcontract work. (Exs. P-60 at pp.110-5 and 110-6, P-1J, Schedule B; <strong>Board</strong><br />
Finding).<br />
229. These markups to cost compensate the contractor, inter alia, for administration,<br />
general and project superintendence, bond costs, overhead and pr<strong>of</strong>it. (Ex. P-60 at pp. 110-5,<br />
110-6.)<br />
230. Intercounty claims that it incurred costs totaling $ 11,530.27 for Extended Field<br />
Conditions during the 223 delay period (also referred to herein as the “Extended Period”) needed<br />
to complete the Project. These additional costs for Extended Field Conditions include: $4,000<br />
for lot rental; $1,677.40 for trailer rental; $127.79 for inspector’s <strong>of</strong>fice supplies; $1,923.76 for<br />
telephones; $1,690.27 for electricity; $466.40 for job container rental; $1,004.65 for dumpsters<br />
and $640.00 for sanitary facilities. (N.T. 747-756, 823-824, 835-839, 869; Exs. P-1J; P-85).<br />
231. Intercounty established that it incurred $11,530.27 in additional costs for<br />
Extended Field Conditions in the Extended Period. (F.O.F. 222-230; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />
232. With markups pursuant to Section 110.03(d)(4) and (7) <strong>of</strong> the 408 Specifications<br />
on the additional costs for Extended Field Conditions, Intercounty incurred total damages for<br />
Extended Field conditions in the Extended Period <strong>of</strong> $12,470.02. (Exs. P-60 at pp. 110-5 and<br />
110-6; F.O.F. 231; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />
233. Intercounty initially claimed $22,329.83 for additional Maintenance and<br />
Protection <strong>of</strong> Traffic (“MPT”) due to delay through the Extended Period from November 6, 2002<br />
to the end <strong>of</strong> the Project. (N.T. 796-797, 855-856; Exs. P-1J, P-85(10); Ex. D-16).<br />
31