3720 - Board of Claims
3720 - Board of Claims
3720 - Board of Claims
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
when doing its excavations subgrade and paving work. This caused Intercounty delay and<br />
disruption to its work on the Project in Sections One and Two. (N.T. 150-152, 229-230, 535,<br />
1059-1064, 1126; Ex. D-5; F.O.F. 71-75, 76-78, 80, 83, 134-135, 165, 171-192; <strong>Board</strong><br />
Finding).<br />
194. From August to October 2002, PennDOT ordered Intercounty to accelerate to try<br />
to finish the Project. While Intercounty and PennDOT were anxious to complete paving in 2002,<br />
the Contract contained restrictions against paving after October 31, 2002 because cold weather<br />
could adversely affect the bituminous mixture that was used. PennDOT refused to waive the<br />
specifications dictating the quality <strong>of</strong> the paving, so Intercounty could not proceed with the<br />
paving in the cold weather. (Ex. P-51; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />
195. Due to winter weather, PennDOT suspended road construction paving activities<br />
from December 24, 2002 to April 10, 2003 for a total <strong>of</strong> 109 days. (N.T. 522-523, 953-954; Ex.<br />
P-61).<br />
196. The pole relocation problems had already pushed the SR 2001 Project into 2003<br />
and an additional design problem occurred at the intersection <strong>of</strong> Weber Road and SR 2001.<br />
(N.T. 541; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />
197. The township objected to the width and steepness <strong>of</strong> the SR 2001 roadway at the<br />
Weber Road intersection. PennDOT eventually agreed to redesign it to lower the grade and<br />
improve the sight distances. (Exs. P-15, P-47, P-54, P-61).<br />
198. Intercounty constructed this section <strong>of</strong> SR 2001 at the Weber Road intersection<br />
and was paid for the extra work, but Intercounty was not compensated for any delay during this<br />
time. (N.T. 1153-1154; Ex. P-61).<br />
199. The Project was accepted, and the <strong>of</strong>ficial completion date was June 17, 2003.<br />
(Ex. P-53).<br />
200. In its original construction schedule, Intercounty planned to complete the Project<br />
by August 6, 2002. The contract completion date was November 6, 2002. (N.T. 486; Ex. P-53)<br />
201. From the contract completion date <strong>of</strong> November 6, 2002 to the actual completion<br />
date <strong>of</strong> June 17, 2003 was a period <strong>of</strong> 223 days or about seven months. (Ex. P-53; <strong>Board</strong><br />
Finding).<br />
202. On January 1, 2004, PennDOT authorized a 223 day extension <strong>of</strong> the Project’s<br />
completion date from November 6, 2002 to June 17, 2003. In PennDOT’s written authorization<br />
for certain additional expenses for this extended period, PennDOT wrote that the extra cost was<br />
caused by the “failure <strong>of</strong> the utility companies to relocate poles as planned and by overruns in<br />
earthwork quantities.” (Exs. P-53, P-2C, P-2E; Ex. D-31).<br />
25