12.04.2015 Views

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

281. The <strong>Board</strong> finds that the difference between the 67 planned days <strong>of</strong> original<br />

excavation and the 135 days <strong>of</strong> actual original excavation is 68 days <strong>of</strong> actual original<br />

excavation. We further find that these 68 days are a reasonable measure <strong>of</strong> the disruption caused<br />

to Intercounty by the utility pole relocation issues and PennDOT’s active interference with<br />

Intercounty’s work. (N.T. 242-246, 893-895; Exs. P-1J, P-5, P-61, P-69, P-77, P-85; Ex. D-24;<br />

F.O.F. 269-280; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />

282. Intercounty experienced 68 extra days <strong>of</strong> original excavation that were caused by<br />

PennDOT’s active interference. (F.O.F. 269-282; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />

283. The Project’s excavation records that show the areas <strong>of</strong> roadway worked upon<br />

during the 68 extra days along with the Project’s plans, drawings and elevations, as well as the<br />

testimony and pictures in evidence all support Intercounty’s assumption that it used a full crew to<br />

work a full day for these 68 extra days (N.T. 984; Ex. P-77; Ex. D-24; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />

284. Intercounty initially claimed that it incurred lost productivity costs on the Project<br />

due to 68 additional days <strong>of</strong> original excavation caused by PennDOT’s active interference in the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> $430,100, but, responding to PennDOT challenge <strong>of</strong> its crew make-up costs, revised<br />

and reduced its lost productivity cost claim by eliminating the following laborers: 1 foreman, 1<br />

operator and two flaggers. (PennDOT’s Post-Hearing Brief; Intercounty’s Reply to PennDOT’s<br />

Post-Hearing Brief at p. 45 and App. 2 at p. 3; Ex. P-85 (15)).<br />

285. Intercounty’s revised lost productivity claim is as follows:<br />

Labor costs: 1 Foreman at $217/day and 2 Laborers at $215/day each and 1<br />

Operator at $318/day = 965/day. $965 times 68 additional days <strong>of</strong> Class 1<br />

excavation = $65,620 in additional labor costs.<br />

Equipment costs: 1 excavator at $500/day and 7 trucks at $500/ day each and 1<br />

Dozer at $250/day and 1 Pickup truck at $65/day and 1 Rack body truck at<br />

$80/day = $4,395/day in equipment costs. $4,395 times 68 additional days =<br />

$298,860.<br />

Thus, Intercounty now claims that its total labor and equipment costs due to lost productivity are<br />

$364,480 ($65,620 labor + $298,860 equipment). (Intercounty’s Reply to PennDOT’s Post-<br />

Hearing Brief at p. 45 and App. 2 at p. 3; Ex. P-77; Ex. D-24; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />

286. On the evidence provided, Intercounty’s estimate <strong>of</strong> 68 days <strong>of</strong> its lost<br />

productivity is justified, adequately supported and reasonably certain. (F.O.F. 269-285; <strong>Board</strong><br />

Finding).<br />

287. The <strong>Board</strong> finds that Intercounty incurred lost productivity costs on the Project<br />

due to PennDOT’s active interference and reflected by the 68 additional days <strong>of</strong> original<br />

excavation, in the sum <strong>of</strong> $364,480. (F.O.F. 269-286; <strong>Board</strong> Finding).<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!